Literature DB >> 25463138

Anticipating action effects recruits audiovisual movement representations in the ventral premotor cortex.

Matthias Bischoff1, Karen Zentgraf2, Sebastian Pilgramm3, Rudolf Stark4, Britta Krüger5, Jörn Munzert6.   

Abstract

When table tennis players anticipate the course of the ball while preparing their motor responses, they not only observe their opponents striking the ball but also listen to events such as the sound of racket-ball contact. Because visual stimuli can be detected more easily when accompanied by a sound, we assumed that complementary sensory audiovisual information would influence the anticipation of biological motion, especially when the racket-ball contact is not presented visually, but has to be inferred from continuous movement kinematics and an abrupt sound. Twenty-six observers were examined with fMRI while watching point-light displays (PLDs) of an opposing table tennis player. Their task was to anticipate the resultant ball flight. The sound was presented complementary to the veracious event or at a deviant time point in its kinematics. Results showed that participants performed best in the complementary condition. Using a region-of-interest approach, fMRI data showed that complementary audiovisual stimulation elicited higher activation in the left temporo-occipital middle temporal gyrus (MTGto), the left primary motor cortex, and the right anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS). Both hemispheres also revealed higher activation in the ventral premotor cortex (vPMC) and the pars opercularis of the inferior frontal gyrus (BA 44). Ranking the behavioral effect of complementary versus conflicting audiovisual information over participants revealed an association between the complementary information and higher activation in the right vPMC. We conclude that the recruitment of movement representations in the auditory and visual modalities in the vPMC can be influenced by task-relevant cross-modal audiovisual interaction.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action effects; Anticipation; Movement representations; Multisensory research; vPMC

Year:  2014        PMID: 25463138     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  5 in total

1.  Sensitivity to perception level differentiates two subnetworks within the mirror neuron system.

Authors:  Shiri Simon; Roy Mukamel
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Training Level Does Not Affect Auditory Perception of The Magnitude of Ball Spin in Table Tennis.

Authors:  Daniel P R Santos; Roberto N Barbosa; Luiz H P Vieira; Paulo R P Santiago; Alessandro M Zagatto; Matheus M Gomes
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 2.193

3.  Incidental or Intentional? Different Brain Responses to One's Own Action Sounds in Hurdling vs. Tap Dancing.

Authors:  Nina Heins; Jennifer Pomp; Daniel S Kluger; Ima Trempler; Karen Zentgraf; Markus Raab; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Attention Control and Audiomotor Processes Underlying Anticipation of Musical Themes while Listening to Familiar Sonata-Form Pieces.

Authors:  Chia-Wei Li; Chen-Gia Tsai
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-02-13

5.  Domain-Specific and Unspecific Reaction Times in Experienced Team Handball Goalkeepers and Novices.

Authors:  Fabian Helm; Mathias Reiser; Jörn Munzert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.