Literature DB >> 25463036

Contribution of animal studies to evaluate the similarity of biosimilars to reference products.

Peter J K van Meer1, Hans C Ebbers2, Marlous Kooijman3, Christine C Gispen-de Wied4, Beatriz Silva-Lima5, Ellen H M Moors3, Huub Schellekens6.   

Abstract

The European Union (EU) was the first region to establish a regulatory framework for biosimilars, in which animal studies are required to confirm similarity to a reference product. However, animal studies described in European public assessment reports (EPARs) or marketing authorization applications (MAAs) did not identify clinically or toxicologically relevant differences despite differences in quality, suggesting that animal studies lack the sensitivity to confirm biosimilarity. Scientific advice provided learning opportunities to evolve existing guidance. Altogether, the data support a step-wise approach to develop biosimilars that focuses on quality and clinical efficacy of biosimilar. This approach might be more effective and does not necessarily require animal studies, which is also reflected in new EU draft guidance.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25463036     DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Discov Today        ISSN: 1359-6446            Impact factor:   7.851


  8 in total

Review 1.  Regulatory Evaluation of Biosimilars: Refinement of Principles Based on the Scientific Evidence and Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Pekka Kurki; Hye-Na Kang; Niklas Ekman; Ivana Knezevic; Martina Weise; Elena Wolff-Holz
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 7.744

Review 2.  Waiving in vivo studies for monoclonal antibody biosimilar development: National and global challenges.

Authors:  Kathryn Chapman; Akosua Adjei; Paul Baldrick; Antonio da Silva; Karen De Smet; Richard DiCicco; Seung Suh Hong; David Jones; Michael W Leach; James McBlane; Ian Ragan; Praveen Reddy; Donald I H Stewart; Amanda Suitters; Jennifer Sims
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 5.857

3.  Nonclinical Evaluation of PF-06438179: A Potential Biosimilar to Remicade® (Infliximab).

Authors:  Mazin Derzi; Theodore R Johnson; Ahmed M Shoieb; Hugh D Conlon; Penny Sharpe; Andrew Saati; Sarah Koob; Michael W Bolt; Leslie G Lorello; Jim McNally; Carol F Kirchhoff; Teresa A Smolarek; Michael W Leach
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  Biosimilars: Key regulatory considerations and similarity assessment tools.

Authors:  Carol F Kirchhoff; Xiao-Zhuo Michelle Wang; Hugh D Conlon; Scott Anderson; Anne M Ryan; Arindam Bose
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Opportunities to Apply the 3Rs in Safety Assessment Programs.

Authors:  Fiona Sewell; Joanna Edwards; Helen Prior; Sally Robinson
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2016-12

6.  A standardised framework to identify optimal animal models for efficacy assessment in drug development.

Authors:  Guilherme S Ferreira; Désirée H Veening-Griffioen; Wouter P C Boon; Ellen H M Moors; Christine C Gispen-de Wied; Huub Schellekens; Peter J K van Meer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparability of Biologics: Global Principles, Evidentiary Consistency and Unrealized Reliance.

Authors:  Christopher J Webster; Kelly L George; Gillian R Woollett
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.807

8.  An Efficient Development Paradigm for Biosimilars.

Authors:  Christopher J Webster; Anny C Wong; Gillian R Woollett
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.807

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.