Literature DB >> 25462851

Control of silicification by genetically engineered fusion proteins: silk-silica binding peptides.

Shun Zhou1, Wenwen Huang2, David J Belton3, Leo O Simmons4, Carole C Perry3, Xiaoqin Wang1, David L Kaplan5.   

Abstract

In the present study, an artificial spider silk gene, 6mer, derived from the consensus sequence of Nephila clavipes dragline silk gene, was fused with different silica-binding peptides (SiBPs), A1, A3 and R5, to study the impact of the fusion protein sequence chemistry on silica formation and the ability to generate a silk-silica composite in two different bioinspired silicification systems: solution-solution and solution-solid. Condensed silica nanoscale particles (600-800 nm) were formed in the presence of the recombinant silk and chimeras, which were smaller than those formed by 15mer-SiBP chimeras, revealing that the molecular weight of the silk domain correlated to the sizes of the condensed silica particles in the solution system. In addition, the chimeras (6mer-A1/A3/R5) produced smaller condensed silica particles than the control (6mer), revealing that the silica particle size formed in the solution system is controlled by the size of protein assemblies in solution. In the solution-solid interface system, silicification reactions were performed on the surface of films fabricated from the recombinant silk proteins and chimeras and then treated to induce β-sheet formation. A higher density of condensed silica formed on the films containing the lowest β-sheet content while the films with the highest β-sheet content precipitated the lowest density of silica, revealing an inverse correlation between the β-sheet secondary structure and the silica content formed on the films. Intriguingly, the 6mer-A3 showed the highest rate of silica condensation but the lowest density of silica deposition on the films, compared with 6mer-A1 and -R5, revealing antagonistic crosstalk between the silk and the SiBP domains in terms of protein assembly. These findings offer a path forward in the tailoring of biopolymer-silica composites for biomaterial related needs.
Copyright © 2014 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fusion proteins; Silica; Silicification; Spider silk

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25462851      PMCID: PMC4331239          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.10.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  31 in total

1.  Functional analysis of the biomimetic silica precipitating activity of the R5 peptide from Cylindrotheca fusiformis.

Authors:  Marc R Knecht; David W Wright
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2003-12-21       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Tunable self-assembly of genetically engineered silk--elastin-like protein polymers.

Authors:  Xiao-Xia Xia; Qiaobing Xu; Xiao Hu; Guokui Qin; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 6.988

3.  Regulation of silk material structure by temperature-controlled water vapor annealing.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Karen Shmelev; Lin Sun; Eun-Seok Gil; Sang-Hyug Park; Peggy Cebe; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 6.988

4.  Morphology of artificial silica matrices formed via autosilification of a silaffin/protein polymer chimera.

Authors:  Wesley D Marner; Afshan S Shaikh; Susan J Muller; Jay D Keasling
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 6.988

Review 5.  Biofabrication of biosilica-glass by living organisms.

Authors:  Heinz C Schröder; Xiaohong Wang; Wolfgang Tremel; Hiroshi Ushijima; Werner E G Müller
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 13.423

6.  Osteoinductive silk-silica composite biomaterials for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Aneta J Mieszawska; Nikolaos Fourligas; Irene Georgakoudi; Nadia M Ouhib; David J Belton; Carole C Perry; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Antimicrobial functionalized genetically engineered spider silk.

Authors:  Sílvia C Gomes; Isabel B Leonor; João F Mano; Rui L Reis; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Bioengineered silk protein-based gene delivery systems.

Authors:  Keiji Numata; Balajikarthick Subramanian; Heather A Currie; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Role of polyalanine domains in beta-sheet formation in spider silk block copolymers.

Authors:  Olena S Rabotyagova; Peggy Cebe; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 4.979

10.  Hydrophobic drug-triggered self-assembly of nanoparticles from silk-elastin-like protein polymers for drug delivery.

Authors:  Xiao-Xia Xia; Ming Wang; Yinan Lin; Qiaobing Xu; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 6.988

View more
  12 in total

1.  Influence of silk-silica fusion protein design on silica condensation in vitro and cellular calcification.

Authors:  Robyn Plowright; Nina Dinjaski; Shun Zhou; David J Belton; David L Kaplan; Carole C Perry
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.361

2.  3D freeform printing of silk fibroin.

Authors:  Maria J Rodriguez; Thomas A Dixon; Eliad Cohen; Wenwen Huang; Fiorenzo G Omenetto; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Intracellular Pathways Involved in Bone Regeneration Triggered by Recombinant Silk-silica Chimeras.

Authors:  Zaira Martín-Moldes; Davoud Ebrahimi; Robyn Plowright; Nina Dinjaski; Carole C Perry; Markus J Buehler; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 18.808

4.  Osteoinductive recombinant silk fusion proteins for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Nina Dinjaski; Robyn Plowright; Shun Zhou; David J Belton; Carole C Perry; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 5.  Intrinsically disordered proteins and biomineralization.

Authors:  Adele L Boskey; Eduardo Villarreal-Ramirez
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 11.583

6.  Effect of the silica nanoparticle size on the osteoinduction of biomineralized silk-silica nanocomposites.

Authors:  Zaira Martín-Moldes; Diego López Barreiro; Markus J Buehler; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 7.  Synergistic Integration of Experimental and Simulation Approaches for the de Novo Design of Silk-Based Materials.

Authors:  Wenwen Huang; Davoud Ebrahimi; Nina Dinjaski; Anna Tarakanova; Markus J Buehler; Joyce Y Wong; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 24.466

8.  (1)H-detected solid-state NMR of proteins entrapped in bioinspired silica: a new tool for biomaterials characterization.

Authors:  Enrico Ravera; Linda Cerofolini; Tommaso Martelli; Alexandra Louka; Marco Fragai; Claudio Luchinat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Silk Materials Functionalized via Genetic Engineering for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Tomasz Deptuch; Hanna Dams-Kozlowska
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  A Redox-Based Autoinduction Strategy to Facilitate Expression of 5xCys-Tagged Proteins for Electrobiofabrication.

Authors:  Sally Wang; Chen-Yu Tsao; Dana Motabar; Jinyang Li; Gregory F Payne; William E Bentley
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.