Irene M Geisner1, Lindsey Varvil-Weld2, Angela J Mittmann3, Kimberly Mallett4, Rob Turrisi5. 1. Center for the Study of Health and Risk Behaviors, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 1100 NE 45th Street, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, USA. Electronic address: geisner@u.washington.edu. 2. Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Biobehavioral Health Bldg., University Park, PA 16802, USA. Electronic address: lvweld@psu.edu. 3. Center for the Study of Health and Risk Behaviors, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 1100 NE 45th Street, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, USA. Electronic address: mittmann@u.washington.edu. 4. Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, 320 Biobehavioral Health Bldg., University Park, PA 16802, USA. Electronic address: kmallett@psu.edu. 5. Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Biobehavioral Health Bldg., University Park, PA 16802, USA; Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, 320 Biobehavioral Health Bldg., University Park, PA 16802, USA. Electronic address: rjt13@psu.edu.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: College is a time of increased risk for problematic alcohol use and depressed mood. The comorbidity of these conditions is well documented, but is less well understood, with few interventions designed to prevent or reduce the related consequences. The current study evaluated a web-based personalized intervention for students (N=311) who reported an AUDIT score of 8 or more, a BDI-II score of 14 or more, and reported drinking four (women) or five (men) or more drinks on at least one occasion in the past month. METHOD:Invited participants were randomly selected from all enrolled undergraduates at a large, public, Pacific Northwestern University. Participants completed a screening and baseline assessment, and those who met study eligibility criteria were randomized to one of four conditions (alcohol only, depressed mood only, integrated, and referral-only control). Follow-up occurred one-month post-intervention. RESULTS: While no main effects for the interventions were found, there were moderation effects, such that students in the alcohol only and integrated conditions who had lower levels of depressed mood or alcohol-related problems at baseline showed greater reductions in alcohol-related problems at follow-up compared to students in the control condition. Implications for interventions are discussed.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: College is a time of increased risk for problematic alcohol use and depressed mood. The comorbidity of these conditions is well documented, but is less well understood, with few interventions designed to prevent or reduce the related consequences. The current study evaluated a web-based personalized intervention for students (N=311) who reported an AUDIT score of 8 or more, a BDI-II score of 14 or more, and reported drinking four (women) or five (men) or more drinks on at least one occasion in the past month. METHOD: Invited participants were randomly selected from all enrolled undergraduates at a large, public, Pacific Northwestern University. Participants completed a screening and baseline assessment, and those who met study eligibility criteria were randomized to one of four conditions (alcohol only, depressed mood only, integrated, and referral-only control). Follow-up occurred one-month post-intervention. RESULTS: While no main effects for the interventions were found, there were moderation effects, such that students in the alcohol only and integrated conditions who had lower levels of depressed mood or alcohol-related problems at baseline showed greater reductions in alcohol-related problems at follow-up compared to students in the control condition. Implications for interventions are discussed.
Authors: Greg Clarke; Ed Reid; Donna Eubanks; Elizabeth O'Connor; Lynn L DeBar; Chris Kelleher; Frances Lynch; Sonia Nunley Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Dawn E Sugarman; Aimee N C Campbell; Brittany R Iles; Shelly F Greenfield Journal: Harv Rev Psychiatry Date: 2017 May/Jun Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Mary Beth Miller; Nicole Hall; Angelo M DiBello; Chan Jeong Park; Lindsey Freeman; Ellen Meier; Eleanor L S Leavens; Thad R Leffingwell Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2020-05-22
Authors: Samuel F Acuff; Matthew T Luciano; Kathryn E Soltis; Keanan J Joyner; Meghan McDevitt-Murphy; James G Murphy Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: J Hazart; M Blanquet; A Debost-Legrand; A Perreve; S Leger; V Martoia; S Maurice; G Brousse; L Gerbaud Journal: J Prev Med Hyg Date: 2018-03-30