Literature DB >> 25462041

Are boys more sensitive to sensitivity? Parenting and executive function in preschoolers.

Viara R Mileva-Seitz1, Akhgar Ghassabian2, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg3, Jessica D van den Brink4, Marielle Linting3, Vincent W V Jaddoe5, Albert Hofman6, Frank C Verhulst7, Henning Tiemeier8, Marinus H van IJzendoorn9.   

Abstract

During early childhood, girls outperform boys on key dimensions of cognitive functions, including inhibitory control, sustained attention, and working memory. The role of parenting in these sex differences is unknown despite evidence that boys are more sensitive to the effects of the early environment. In this study, we measured parental sensitivity at 14 and 36 months of age, and children's cognitive and executive functions (sustained attention, inhibitory control, and forward/backward memory) at 52 months of age, in a longitudinal cohort (N=752). Boys scored significantly lower than girls on inhibitory control (more Go/NoGo "commission errors") and short-term memory (forward color recall task), but boys did not differ from girls on attention (Go/NoGo "omission errors") or working memory (backward color recall task). In stratified analyses, parental sensitivity at 36 months of age was negatively associated with number of errors of commission (p=.05) and omission (p=.02) in boys, whereas child's age was the only significant predictor of commission and omission errors in girls. A combined analysis of both sexes confirmed an interaction between sex and parenting for omission errors (p=.03). The results indicate that sex differences in cognitive functions are evident in preschoolers, although not across all dimensions we assessed. Boys appear to be more vulnerable to early parenting effects, but only in association with omission errors (attention) and not with the other cognitive function dimensions.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Boys; Cognitive function; Inhibitory control; Parental sensitivity; Sex differences

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25462041     DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  7 in total

1.  Prenatal neural origins of infant motor development: Associations between fetal brain and infant motor development.

Authors:  Moriah E Thomason; Jasmine Hect; Rebecca Waller; Janessa H Manning; Ann M Stacks; Marjorie Beeghly; Jordan L Boeve; Kristyn Wong; Marion I van den Heuvel; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2018-08

2.  Parenting Predictors of Delay Inhibition in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Preschoolers.

Authors:  Emily C Merz; Susan H Landry; Tricia A Zucker; Marcia A Barnes; Michael Assel; Heather B Taylor; Christopher J Lonigan; Beth M Phillips; Jeanine Clancy-Menchetti; Nancy Eisenberg; Tracy L Spinrad; Carlos Valiente; Jill de Villiers; The School Readiness Research Consortium
Journal:  Infant Child Dev       Date:  2015-11-27

3.  A dynamic systems perspective towards executive function development: Susceptibility at both ends for inhibitory control.

Authors:  Qiong Wu; Karina Jalapa; Soo Jin Han; Dania Tawfiq; Ming Cui
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2022-03-02

4.  Aerobic fitness and fine motor skills are related to switching and updating in typically developing children.

Authors:  Stephanie Klupp; Alexander Grob; Wenke Möhring
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-10-20

5.  Bidirectional Associations Between Parental Responsiveness and Executive Function During Early Childhood.

Authors:  Emily C Merz; Susan H Landry; Janelle J Montroy; Jeffrey M Williams
Journal:  Soc Dev       Date:  2016-07-22

6.  Differential Effects of Stress Exposures, Caregiving Quality, and Temperament in Early Life on Working Memory versus Inhibitory Control in Preschool-Aged Children.

Authors:  Michelle Bosquet Enlow; Carter R Petty; Cassandra Svelnys; Michaela Gusman; Michelle Huezo; Ashley Malin; Rosalind J Wright
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2017.

Authors:  Marjolein N Kooijman; Claudia J Kruithof; Cornelia M van Duijn; Liesbeth Duijts; Oscar H Franco; Marinus H van IJzendoorn; Johan C de Jongste; Caroline C W Klaver; Aad van der Lugt; Johan P Mackenbach; Henriëtte A Moll; Robin P Peeters; Hein Raat; Edmond H H M Rings; Fernando Rivadeneira; Marc P van der Schroeff; Eric A P Steegers; Henning Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Frank C Verhulst; Eppo Wolvius; Janine F Felix; Vincent W V Jaddoe
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 8.082

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.