Literature DB >> 25461993

Smarter screening for cancer: possibilities and challenges of personalization.

Sameer D Saini1, Frank van Hees2, Sandeep Vijan1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25461993      PMCID： PMC4429871          DOI： 10.1001/jama.2014.13933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN： 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Risk prediction models for colorectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  Aung Ko Win; Robert J Macinnis; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Personalizing age of cancer screening cessation based on comorbid conditions: model estimates of harms and benefits.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Roman Gulati; Angela B Mariotto; Clyde B Schechter; Tiago M de Carvalho; Amy B Knudsen; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Chester Pabiniak; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Carolyn M Rutter; Karen M Kuntz; Eric J Feuer; Ruth Etzioni; Harry J de Koning; Ann G Zauber; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Physician over-recommendation of mammography for terminally ill women.

Authors:  Corinne R Leach; Carrie N Klabunde; Catherine M Alfano; Judith Lee Smith; Julia H Rowland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Prognostic indices for older adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lindsey C Yourman; Sei J Lee; Mara A Schonberg; Eric W Widera; Alexander K Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Older adults and forgoing cancer screening: "I think it would be strange".

Authors:  Alexia M Torke; Peter H Schwartz; Laura R Holtz; Kianna Montz; Greg A Sachs
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Should colorectal cancer screening be considered in elderly persons without previous screening? A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Frank van Hees; J Dik F Habbema; Reinier G Meester; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ann G Zauber
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Role of quality measurement in inappropriate use of screening for colorectal cancer: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sameer D Saini; Sandeep Vijan; Philip Schoenfeld; Adam A Powell; Stephanie Moser; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-02-26
  7 in total
  13 in total

1.  Effects of personalized colorectal cancer risk information on laypersons' interest in colorectal cancer screening: The importance of individual differences.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Christine W Duarte; Susannah Daggett; Andrea Siewers; Bill Killam; Kahsi A Smith; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-07-19

Review 2.  The value of models in informing resource allocation in colorectal cancer screening: the case of The Netherlands.

Authors:  Frank van Hees; Ann G Zauber; Harriët van Veldhuizen; Marie-Louise A Heijnen; Corine Penning; Harry J de Koning; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  When and How to Stop Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults: Five Rules of Thumb for Practitioners.

Authors:  Jennifer K Maratt; Audrey H Calderwood; Sameer D Saini
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Modeling Individual Patient Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Their Tolerance for Complications Risk.

Authors:  Glen B Taksler; Adam T Perzynski; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 5.  Liver cancer: Approaching a personalized care.

Authors:  Jordi Bruix; Kwang-Hyub Han; Gregory Gores; Josep Maria Llovet; Vincenzo Mazzaferro
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 6.  Combining simple patient-oriented tests with state-of-the-art molecular diagnostics for early diagnosis of cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  Older Adults' Views and Communication Preferences About Cancer Screening Cessation.

Authors:  Nancy L Schoenborn; Kimberley Lee; Craig E Pollack; Karen Armacost; Sydney M Dy; John F P Bridges; Qian-Li Xue; Antonio C Wolff; Cynthia Boyd
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Influence of Age and Comorbidity on Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Elderly.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Yingye Zheng; Virginia P Quinn; Elisabeth F Beaber; Carolyn M Rutter; Ethan A Halm; Jessica Chubak; Chyke A Doubeni; Jennifer S Haas; Aruna Kamineni; Marilyn M Schapira; Pamela M Vacek; Michael P Garcia; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  What Should We Recommend for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Adults Aged 75 and Older?

Authors:  Anuj Arora; Sami A Chadi; Tyler Chesney
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Eliciting women's cervical screening preferences: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Brianne Wood; Susan Rogers Van Katwyk; Ziad El-Khatib; Susan McFaul; Monica Taljaard; Erica Wright; Ian D Graham; Julian Little
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.