Literature DB >> 25461879

When does marketisation lead to privatisation? Profit-making in English health services after the 2012 Health and Social Care Act.

Nick Krachler1, Ian Greer2.   

Abstract

Governments world-wide have attempted to use market mechanisms and privatisation to increase the quality and/or reduce the cost of healthcare. England's Health and Social Care Act 2012 is an attempt to promote privatisation through marketisation in the National Health Service (NHS). While the health policy literature tends to assume that privatisation follows from private-sector entry points, we argue that this is more likely if firms expect to make a profit. This paper examines the link between privatisation and marketisation in England drawing on 32 semi-structured interviews with private-sector and public-sector respondents, campaigners, and other experts conducted 6-10 months after the implementation of the 2012 Act. By generating a theoretical framework on the conditions of profitability we seek a better understanding of the conditions under which marketisation leads to privatisation. We find that significant barriers to profit-making remain after the reforms, including a top-down squeeze on prices, uncertainty in market rules, state dominance of funding and provision, and failures to depoliticise the market. These factors restrict private-sector involvement by frustrating profit-making. Where profits are made they are through reduced unit costs and high volumes by a longstanding incumbent in a particular market segment. This, however, restricts marketisation by reinforcing entry barriers.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  England; For-profit healthcare; Health and Social Care Act 2012; Marketisation and privatisation of healthcare; National health service

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25461879     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  4 in total

1.  NHS Activism: The Limits and Potentialities of a New Solidarity.

Authors:  Piyush Pushkar
Journal:  Med Anthropol       Date:  2018-11-14

2.  Doctors Rule: An Analysis of Health Ministers' Diaries in Australia.

Authors:  Katherine Cullerton; Tom White; Amanda Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Experiences with online consultation systems in primary care: case study of one early adopter site.

Authors:  Michael Casey; Sara Shaw; Deborah Swinglehurst
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups.

Authors:  Pauline Allen; Dorota Osipovič; Elizabeth Shepherd; Anna Coleman; Neil Perkins; Emma Garnett; Lorraine Williams
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.