Literature DB >> 25461590

Electron imaging with an EBSD detector.

Stuart I Wright1, Matthew M Nowell2, René de Kloe3, Patrick Camus4, Travis Rampton4.   

Abstract

Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) has proven to be a useful tool for characterizing the crystallographic orientation aspects of microstructures at length scales ranging from tens of nanometers to millimeters in the scanning electron microscope (SEM). With the advent of high-speed digital cameras for EBSD use, it has become practical to use the EBSD detector as an imaging device similar to a backscatter (or forward-scatter) detector. Using the EBSD detector in this manner enables images exhibiting topographic, atomic density and orientation contrast to be obtained at rates similar to slow scanning in the conventional SEM manner. The high-speed acquisition is achieved through extreme binning of the camera-enough to result in a 5 × 5 pixel pattern. At such high binning, the captured patterns are not suitable for indexing. However, no indexing is required for using the detector as an imaging device. Rather, a 5 × 5 array of images is formed by essentially using each pixel in the 5 × 5 pixel pattern as an individual scattered electron detector. The images can also be formed at traditional EBSD scanning rates by recording the image data during a scan or can also be formed through post-processing of patterns recorded at each point in the scan. Such images lend themselves to correlative analysis of image data with the usual orientation data provided by and with chemical data obtained simultaneously via X-Ray Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (XEDS).
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EBSD; Electron imaging; PRIAS; Synthetic-BSD; Virtual FSD

Year:  2014        PMID: 25461590     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultramicroscopy        ISSN: 0304-3991            Impact factor:   2.689


  4 in total

1.  Orientation mapping of graphene using 4D STEM-in-SEM.

Authors:  Benjamin W Caplins; Jason D Holm; Ryan M White; Robert R Keller
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 2.689

2.  Polynomial fitting method of background correction for electron backscatter diffraction patterns.

Authors:  Yi-Yun Tsai; Yi-Chen Pan; Jui-Chao Kuo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Nanofaceting as a stamp for periodic graphene charge carrier modulations.

Authors:  M Vondráček; D Kalita; M Kučera; L Fekete; J Kopeček; J Lančok; J Coraux; V Bouchiat; J Honolka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Quantitative imaging of anti-phase domains by polarity sensitive orientation mapping using electron backscatter diffraction.

Authors:  G Naresh-Kumar; A Vilalta-Clemente; H Jussila; A Winkelmann; G Nolze; S Vespucci; S Nagarajan; A J Wilkinson; C Trager-Cowan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.