| Literature DB >> 25461337 |
Caroline Petitjean1, Maria A Zuluaga2, Wenjia Bai3, Jean-Nicolas Dacher4, Damien Grosgeorge5, Jérôme Caudron4, Su Ruan5, Ismail Ben Ayed6, M Jorge Cardoso2, Hsiang-Chou Chen7, Daniel Jimenez-Carretero8, Maria J Ledesma-Carbayo8, Christos Davatzikos9, Jimit Doshi9, Guray Erus9, Oskar M O Maier8, Cyrus M S Nambakhsh10, Yangming Ou11, Sébastien Ourselin2, Chun-Wei Peng7, Nicholas S Peters12, Terry M Peters10, Martin Rajchl10, Daniel Rueckert3, Andres Santos8, Wenzhe Shi3, Ching-Wei Wang7, Haiyan Wang3, Jing Yuan10.
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), a reference examination for cardiac morphology and function in humans, allows to image the cardiac right ventricle (RV) with high spatial resolution. The segmentation of the RV is a difficult task due to the variable shape of the RV and its ill-defined borders in these images. The aim of this paper is to evaluate several RV segmentation algorithms on common data. More precisely, we report here the results of the Right Ventricle Segmentation Challenge (RVSC), concretized during the MICCAI'12 Conference with an on-site competition. Seven automated and semi-automated methods have been considered, along them three atlas-based methods, two prior based methods, and two prior-free, image-driven methods that make use of cardiac motion. The obtained contours were compared against a manual tracing by an expert cardiac radiologist, taken as a reference, using Dice metric and Hausdorff distance. We herein describe the cardiac data composed of 48 patients, the evaluation protocol and the results. Best results show that an average 80% Dice accuracy and a 1cm Hausdorff distance can be expected from semi-automated algorithms for this challenging task on the datasets, and that an automated algorithm can reach similar performance, at the expense of a high computational burden. Data are now publicly available and the website remains open for new submissions (http://www.litislab.eu/rvsc/).Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac MRI; Collation study; Right ventricle segmentation; Segmentation challenge; Segmentation method evaluation
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25461337 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2014.10.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Image Anal ISSN: 1361-8415 Impact factor: 8.545