Literature DB >> 25461337

Right ventricle segmentation from cardiac MRI: a collation study.

Caroline Petitjean1, Maria A Zuluaga2, Wenjia Bai3, Jean-Nicolas Dacher4, Damien Grosgeorge5, Jérôme Caudron4, Su Ruan5, Ismail Ben Ayed6, M Jorge Cardoso2, Hsiang-Chou Chen7, Daniel Jimenez-Carretero8, Maria J Ledesma-Carbayo8, Christos Davatzikos9, Jimit Doshi9, Guray Erus9, Oskar M O Maier8, Cyrus M S Nambakhsh10, Yangming Ou11, Sébastien Ourselin2, Chun-Wei Peng7, Nicholas S Peters12, Terry M Peters10, Martin Rajchl10, Daniel Rueckert3, Andres Santos8, Wenzhe Shi3, Ching-Wei Wang7, Haiyan Wang3, Jing Yuan10.   

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), a reference examination for cardiac morphology and function in humans, allows to image the cardiac right ventricle (RV) with high spatial resolution. The segmentation of the RV is a difficult task due to the variable shape of the RV and its ill-defined borders in these images. The aim of this paper is to evaluate several RV segmentation algorithms on common data. More precisely, we report here the results of the Right Ventricle Segmentation Challenge (RVSC), concretized during the MICCAI'12 Conference with an on-site competition. Seven automated and semi-automated methods have been considered, along them three atlas-based methods, two prior based methods, and two prior-free, image-driven methods that make use of cardiac motion. The obtained contours were compared against a manual tracing by an expert cardiac radiologist, taken as a reference, using Dice metric and Hausdorff distance. We herein describe the cardiac data composed of 48 patients, the evaluation protocol and the results. Best results show that an average 80% Dice accuracy and a 1cm Hausdorff distance can be expected from semi-automated algorithms for this challenging task on the datasets, and that an automated algorithm can reach similar performance, at the expense of a high computational burden. Data are now publicly available and the website remains open for new submissions (http://www.litislab.eu/rvsc/).
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac MRI; Collation study; Right ventricle segmentation; Segmentation challenge; Segmentation method evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25461337     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2014.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  33 in total

Review 1.  Principles and methods for automatic and semi-automatic tissue segmentation in MRI data.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Teodora Chitiboi; Hans Meine; Matthias Günther; Horst K Hahn
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  A cascaded FC-DenseNet and level set method (FCDL) for fully automatic segmentation of the right ventricle in cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Yang Luo; Lisheng Xu; Lin Qi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Cardiac MRI-Derived Myocardial Deformation Parameters Correlate with Pulmonary Valve Replacement Indications in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  Benjamin H Goot; Edythe B Tham; Deepa Krishnaswamy; Kumaradevan Punithakumar; Michelle Noga
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Reliable segmentation of 2D cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion image sequences using time as the 3rd dimension.

Authors:  Veit Sandfort; Matthew Jacobs; Andrew E Arai; Li-Yueh Hsu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Correlated Regression Feature Learning for Automated Right Ventricle Segmentation.

Authors:  Jun Chen; Heye Zhang; Weiwei Zhang; Xiuquan Du; Yanping Zhang; Shuo Li
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.316

Review 6.  Reference ranges ("normal values") for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update.

Authors:  Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Scott J Hetzel; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Gabriella Captur; Christopher J Francois; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Michael Salerno; Shawn D Teague; Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Rob J van der Geest; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 7.  Machine Learning and Deep Neural Networks in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Tara A Retson; Alexandra H Besser; Sean Sall; Daniel Golden; Albert Hsiao
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  4D modelling for rapid assessment of biventricular function in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  K Gilbert; B Pontre; C J Occleshaw; B R Cowan; A Suinesiaputra; A A Young
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Segmentation of the right ventricle in four chamber cine cardiac MR images using polar dynamic programming.

Authors:  Jose A Rosado-Toro; Aiden Abidov; Maria I Altbach; Isabel B Oliva; Jeffrey J Rodriguez; Ryan J Avery
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.790

10.  FULLY AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION OF THE RIGHT VENTRICLE VIA MULTI-TASK DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS.

Authors:  Liang Zhang; Georgios Vasileios Karanikolas; Mehmet Akçakaya; Georgios B Giannakis
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process       Date:  2018-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.