Literature DB >> 25461105

Effects of water-saving irrigation practices and drought resistant rice variety on greenhouse gas emissions from a no-till paddy in the central lowlands of China.

Ying Xu1, Junzhu Ge1, Shaoyang Tian1, Shuya Li1, Anthony L Nguy-Robertson2, Ming Zhan3, Cougui Cao4.   

Abstract

As pressure on water resources increases, alternative practices to conserve water in paddies have been developed. Few studies have simultaneously examined the effectiveness of different water regimes on conserving water, mitigating greenhouse gases (GHG), and maintaining yields in rice production. This study, which was conducted during the drought of 2013, examined all three factors using a split-plot experiment with two rice varieties in a no-till paddy managed under three different water regimes: 1) continuous flooding (CF), 2) flooded and wet intermittent irrigation (FWI), and 3) flooded and dry intermittent irrigation (FDI). The Methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions were measured using static chamber-gas measurements, and the carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions were monitored using a soil CO₂ flux system (LI-8100). Compared with CF, FWI and FDI irrigation strategies reduced CH₄ emissions by 60% and 83%, respectively. In contrast, CO₂ and N₂O fluxes increased by 65% and 9%, respectively, under FWI watering regime and by 104% and 11%, respectively, under FDI managed plots. Although CO₂ and N₂O emissions increased, the global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) of all three GHG decreased by up to 25% and 29% (p<0.01), respectively, using water-saving irrigation strategies. The rice variety also affected yields and GHG emissions in response to different water regimes. The drought-resistance rice variety (HY3) was observed to maintain yields, conserve water, and reduce GHG under the FWI irrigation management compared with the typical variety (FYY299) planted in the region. The FYY299 only had significantly lower GWP and GHGI when the yield was reduced under FDI water regime. In conclusion, FWI irrigation strategy could be an effective option for simultaneously saving water and mitigating GWP without reducing rice yields using drought-resistant rice varieties, such as HY3.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon dioxide; Drought-resistance rice; Global warming potential; Methane; Nitrous oxide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25461105     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  7 in total

1.  Effects of screenhouse cultivation and organic materials incorporation on global warming potential in rice fields.

Authors:  Guochun Xu; Xin Liu; Qiangsheng Wang; Ruiheng Xiong; Yuhao Hang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Comprehensive improvement of soil quality and rice yield by flooding-midseason drying-flooding.

Authors:  Jinsong He; Ting Liu; Wei Wang; Xiaohong Wu; Jun Wang; Wende Yan
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 5.560

3.  No-tillage effects on grain yield, N use efficiency, and nutrient runoff losses in paddy fields.

Authors:  Xinqiang Liang; Huifang Zhang; Miaomiao He; Junli Yuan; Lixian Xu; Guangming Tian
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Nitrogen fertilizer in combination with an ameliorant mitigated yield-scaled greenhouse gas emissions from a coastal saline rice field in southeastern China.

Authors:  Liying Sun; Yuchun Ma; Bo Li; Cheng Xiao; Lixin Fan; Zhengqin Xiong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Effect of moisture gradient on rice yields and greenhouse gas emissions from rice paddies.

Authors:  Xianxian Zhang; Huifeng Sun; Junli Wang; Jining Zhang; Guolan Liu; Sheng Zhou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Climate change, cash transfers and health.

Authors:  Frank Pega; Caroline Shaw; Kumanan Rasanathan; Jennifer Yablonski; Ichiro Kawachi; Simon Hales
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  The environmental costs and benefits of high-yield farming.

Authors:  Andrew Balmford; Tatsuya Amano; Harriet Bartlett; Dave Chadwick; Adrian Collins; David Edwards; Rob Field; Philip Garnsworthy; Rhys Green; Pete Smith; Helen Waters; Andrew Whitmore; Donald M Broom; Julian Chara; Tom Finch; Emma Garnett; Alfred Gathorne-Hardy; Juan Hernandez-Medrano; Mario Herrero; Fangyuan Hua; Agnieszka Latawiec; Tom Misselbrook; Ben Phalan; Benno I Simmons; Taro Takahashi; James Vause; Erasmus Zu Ermgassen; Rowan Eisner
Journal:  Nat Sustain       Date:  2018-09-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.