Literature DB >> 25460863

Tachycardia-dependent augmentation of "notched J waves" in a general patient population without ventricular fibrillation or cardiac arrest: not a repolarization but a depolarization abnormality?

Yoshifusa Aizawa1, Masahito Sato2, Hitoshi Kitazawa2, Yoshiyasu Aizawa3, Seiji Takatsuki3, Eiji Oda2, Masaaki Okabe2, Keiichi Fukuda3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: J waves can be observed in individuals of the general population, but electrocardiographic characteristics are poorly understood.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the J-wave dynamicity in a general patient population.
METHODS: The responses of J waves (>0.1 mV above the isoelectric line in 2 contiguous leads) to varying RR intervals were analyzed. Patients with aborted sudden cardiac death, documented ventricular fibrillation, or a family history of sudden cardiac death were excluded. The J-wave amplitude was measured at baseline, in beats with short RR intervals in conducted atrial premature beats (APBs) or atrial stimulation during the electrophysiology study, and in the beats next to APBs with prolonged RR intervals.
RESULTS: Mainly notched J waves were identified in 94 of 701 (24.5%) general patients (13.4%), and APBs were present in 23 of 94 (24.5%) patients. The mean baseline amplitude of J waves was 0.20 ± 0.06 mV at the baseline RR interval of 853 ± 152 ms, 0.25 ± 0.11 mV at the RR interval in the conducted APB of 545 ± 133 ms (P = .0018), and 0.19 ± 0.08 mV at the RR interval of 1146 ± 314 ms (P = .3102). The clinical characteristics were not different between patients with and without tachycardia-dependent augmentation of J waves. Augmentation of J waves was confirmed by the electrophysiology study: 0.28 ± 0.12 mV vs 0.42 ± 0.11 mV at baseline and in the beats of atrial stimulation, respectively (P = .0001). However, no bradycardia-dependent augmentation (>0.05 mV) was observed. Such tachycardia-dependent augmentation can represent depolarization abnormality rather than repolarization abnormality.
CONCLUSION: J waves in a general patient population were augmented at shorter RR intervals, but not at prolonged RR intervals. Mechanistically, conduction delay is most likely responsible for this.
Copyright © 2015 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conduction delay; Early repolarization; J waves; Rate dependency

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25460863     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  15 in total

Review 1.  The Osborn wave: what have we learned?

Authors:  Hesham R Omar
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  A novel pattern of fast calcium oscillations points to calcium and electrical activity cross-talk in rat chromaffin cells.

Authors:  M Micheletti; A Brioschi; R Fesce; F Grohovaz
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  J-Wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: Emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge.

Authors:  Charles Antzelevitch; Gan-Xin Yan; Michael J Ackerman; Martin Borggrefe; Domenico Corrado; Jihong Guo; Ihor Gussak; Can Hasdemir; Minoru Horie; Heikki Huikuri; Changsheng Ma; Hiroshi Morita; Gi-Byoung Nam; Frederic Sacher; Wataru Shimizu; Sami Viskin; Arthur A M Wilde
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 4.  J-Wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: Emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge.

Authors:  Charles Antzelevitch; Gan-Xin Yan; Michael J Ackerman; Martin Borggrefe; Domenico Corrado; Jihong Guo; Ihor Gussak; Can Hasdemir; Minoru Horie; Heikki Huikuri; Changsheng Ma; Hiroshi Morita; Gi-Byoung Nam; Frederic Sacher; Wataru Shimizu; Sami Viskin; Arthur A M Wilde
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 5.  J-wave syndromes: Brugada and early repolarization syndromes.

Authors:  Charles Antzelevitch; Gan-Xin Yan
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 6.  12-lead electrocardiogram features of arrhythmic risk: A focus on early repolarization.

Authors:  Caterina Rizzo; Francesco Monitillo; Massimo Iacoviello
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-26

7.  J-Wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: Emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge.

Authors:  Charles Antzelevitch; Gan-Xin Yan; Michael J Ackerman; Martin Borggrefe; Domenico Corrado; Jihong Guo; Ihor Gussak; Can Hasdemir; Minoru Horie; Heikki Huikuri; Changsheng Ma; Hiroshi Morita; Gi-Byoung Nam; Frederic Sacher; Wataru Shimizu; Sami Viskin; Arthur A M Wilde
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-08-21

Review 8.  J Wave Syndromes: History and Current Controversies.

Authors:  Tong Liu; Jifeng Zheng; Gan-Xin Yan
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.243

9.  High Prevalence and Clinical Implication of Myocardial Bridging in Patients with Early Repolarization.

Authors:  Jiwon Seo; Junbeom Park; Jaewon Oh; Jae Sun Uhm; Jung Hoon Sung; Jong Youn Kim; Hui Nam Pak; Moon Hyoung Lee; Boyoung Joung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 10.  Intracoronary acetylcholine application as a possible probe inducing J waves in patients with early repolarization syndrome.

Authors:  Toru Maruyama; Kazumasa Fujita; Kei Irie; Shouhei Moriyama; Mitsuhiro Fukata
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2017-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.