Literature DB >> 25460837

Influence of interpregnancy interval on neonatal morbidity.

Emily A DeFranco1, Laura M Seske2, James M Greenberg3, Louis J Muglia4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the influence of birth spacing on neonatal morbidity, stratified by gestational age at birth. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using Ohio birth records, 2006 through 2011. We compared various interpregnancy interval (IPI) lengths in multiparous mothers with the rate and risk of adverse newborn outcomes. The frequency of neonatal intensive care unit admission or neonatal transport to a tertiary care facility was calculated for births occurring after IPI lengths: <6, 6 to <12, 12 to <24, 24 to <60, and ≥60 months, and stratified by week of gestational age. Neonatal morbidity risk was calculated for each IPI compared to 12 to <24 months (referent), and adjusted for the concomitant influences gestational age at birth, maternal race, age, and prior preterm birth.
RESULTS: We analyzed 395,146 birth outcomes of singleton nonanomalous neonates born to multiparous mothers. The frequency and adjusted odds of neonatal morbidity were lowest following IPI of 12 to <24 months (4.1%) compared to short IPIs of <6 months (5.7%; adjusted odds ratio [adjOR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-1.49) and 6 to <12 months (4.7%; adjOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.13-1.25), and long IPIs 24 to <60 months (4.6%; adjOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.17) and ≥60 months (5.8%; adjOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.28-1.40), despite adjustment for important confounding factors including gestational age at birth. The lowest frequency of adverse neonatal outcomes occurred at 40-41 weeks for all IPI groups. The frequency of other individual immediate newborn morbidities were also increased following short and long IPIs compared to birth following a 12- to <24-month IPI.
CONCLUSION: IPI length is a significant contributor to neonatal morbidity, independent of gestational age at birth. Counseling women to plan an optimal amount of time between pregnancies is important for newborn health.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth spacing; birth timing; interpregnancy interval; neonatal morbidity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25460837     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  16 in total

1.  The effect of immediate postpartum levonorgestrel contraceptive implant use on breastfeeding and infant growth: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sarah Averbach; Othman Kakaire; Rachel McDiehl; Christine Dehlendorf; Felicia Lester; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Adolescent Interpregnancy Interval in Colorado Among Women With a Last Live Birth Between 2004 and 2013.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Christopher White; Jeanelle Sheeder; Kirk Bol; Bernadette A Albanese
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  The influence of interpregnancy interval on infant mortality.

Authors:  David McKinney; Melissa House; Aimin Chen; Louis Muglia; Emily DeFranco
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  The association between interdelivery interval and adverse perinatal outcomes in a diverse US population.

Authors:  L M Yee; Y N Truong; A B Caughey; Y W Cheng
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  A Population-Based Matched-Sibling Analysis Estimating the Associations Between First Interpregnancy Interval and Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Annette K Regan; Stephen J Ball; Joshua L Warren; Eva Malacova; Amy Padula; Cicely Marston; Natasha Nassar; Fiona Stanley; Helen Leonard; Nicholas de Klerk; Gavin Pereira
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Estimating the Period Prevalence of Publicly Funded Abortion to Space Live Births, 1999 to 2014.

Authors:  James Studnicki; John W Fisher; Tessa Longbons; David C Reardon; Christopher Craver; Donna J Harrison
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

7.  New clinical performance measures for contraceptive care: their importance to healthcare quality.

Authors:  Loretta Gavin; Brittni Frederiksen; Cheryl Robbins; Karen Pazol; Susan Moskosky
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Postpartum intentions on contraception use and method choice among breastfeeding women attending a university hospital in Ohio: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yiska Loewenberg Weisband; Lisa M Keder; Sarah A Keim; Maria F Gallo
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 9.  Drug interactions between hormonal contraceptives and antiretrovirals.

Authors:  Kavita Nanda; Gretchen S Stuart; Jennifer Robinson; Andrew L Gray; Naomi K Tepper; Mary E Gaffield
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.177

10.  Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal outcomes in high-resource settings: An updated systematic review.

Authors:  Katherine A Ahrens; Heidi Nelson; Reva L Stidd; Susan Moskosky; Jennifer A Hutcheon
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.