Anisiia Doytchinova1, Jheel Patel1, Shengmei Zhou2, Lan S Chen3, Hongbo Lin4, Changyu Shen4, Thomas H Everett1, Shien-Fong Lin1, Peng-Sheng Chen5. 1. Krannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. 2. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. 3. Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana. 5. Krannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. Electronic address: chenpp@iu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stellate ganglion nerve activity (SGNA) is important in ventricular arrhythmogenesis. However, because thoracotomy is needed to access the stellate ganglion, it is difficult to use SGNA for risk stratification. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that subcutaneous nerve activity (SCNA) in canines can be used to estimate SGNA and predict ventricular arrhythmia. METHODS: We implanted radiotransmitters to continuously monitor left stellate ganglion and subcutaneous electrical activities in 7 ambulatory dogs with myocardial infarction, complete heart block, and nerve growth factor infusion to the left stellate ganglion. RESULTS: Spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) was documented in each dog. SCNA preceded a combined 61 episodes of VT and VF, 61 frequent bigeminy or couplets, and 61 premature ventricular contractions within 15 seconds in 70%, 59%, and 61% of arrhythmias, respectively. Similar incidence of 75%, 69%, and 62% was noted for SGNA. Progressive increase in SCNA [48.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 39.3-58.5) vs 61.8 (95% CI 45.9-77.6) vs 75.1 (95% CI 57.5-92.7) mV-s] and SGNA [48.6 (95% CI 40.9-56.3) vs 58.5 (95% CI 47.5-69.4) vs 69.0 (95% CI 53.8-84.2) mV-s] integrated over 20-second intervals was demonstrated 60 seconds, 40 seconds, and 20 seconds before VT/VF (P <.05), respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient for integrated SCNA and SGNA was 0.73 ± 0.18 (P <.0001 for all dogs, n = 5). Both SCNA and SGNA exhibited circadian variation. CONCLUSION: SCNA can be used as an estimate of SGNA to predict susceptibility to VT and VF in a canine model of ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death.
BACKGROUND: Stellate ganglion nerve activity (SGNA) is important in ventricular arrhythmogenesis. However, because thoracotomy is needed to access the stellate ganglion, it is difficult to use SGNA for risk stratification. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that subcutaneous nerve activity (SCNA) in canines can be used to estimate SGNA and predict ventricular arrhythmia. METHODS: We implanted radiotransmitters to continuously monitor left stellate ganglion and subcutaneous electrical activities in 7 ambulatory dogs with myocardial infarction, complete heart block, and nerve growth factor infusion to the left stellate ganglion. RESULTS: Spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) was documented in each dog. SCNA preceded a combined 61 episodes of VT and VF, 61 frequent bigeminy or couplets, and 61 premature ventricular contractions within 15 seconds in 70%, 59%, and 61% of arrhythmias, respectively. Similar incidence of 75%, 69%, and 62% was noted for SGNA. Progressive increase in SCNA [48.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 39.3-58.5) vs 61.8 (95% CI 45.9-77.6) vs 75.1 (95% CI 57.5-92.7) mV-s] and SGNA [48.6 (95% CI 40.9-56.3) vs 58.5 (95% CI 47.5-69.4) vs 69.0 (95% CI 53.8-84.2) mV-s] integrated over 20-second intervals was demonstrated 60 seconds, 40 seconds, and 20 seconds before VT/VF (P <.05), respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient for integrated SCNA and SGNA was 0.73 ± 0.18 (P <.0001 for all dogs, n = 5). Both SCNA and SGNA exhibited circadian variation. CONCLUSION: SCNA can be used as an estimate of SGNA to predict susceptibility to VT and VF in a canine model of ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death.
Authors: André Diedrich; Warakorn Charoensuk; Robert J Brychta; Andrew C Ertl; Richard Shiavi Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Byung-Chun Jung; Amish S Dave; Alex Y Tan; Ghassan Gholmieh; Shengmei Zhou; David C Wang; A George Akingba; Gregory A Fishbein; Carlo Montemagno; Shien-Fong Lin; Lan S Chen; Peng-Sheng Chen Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Alex Y Tan; Shengmei Zhou; Masahiro Ogawa; Juan Song; Matthew Chu; Hongmei Li; Michael C Fishbein; Shien-Fong Lin; Lan S Chen; Peng-Sheng Chen Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-08-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hendrik Bonnemeier; Jasmin Ortak; Uwe K H Wiegand; Frank Eberhardt; Frank Bode; Heribert Schunkert; Hugo A Katus; Gert Richardt Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Masahiro Ogawa; Shengmei Zhou; Alex Y Tan; Juan Song; Ghassan Gholmieh; Michael C Fishbein; Huai Luo; Robert J Siegel; Hrayr S Karagueuzian; Lan S Chen; Shien-Fong Lin; Peng-Sheng Chen Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-07-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Yuan Yuan; Jonathan L Hassel; Anisiia Doytchinova; David Adams; Keith C Wright; Chad Meshberger; Lan S Chen; Maria P Guerra; Changyu Shen; Shien-Fong Lin; Thomas H Everett; Vicenta Salanova; Peng-Sheng Chen Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Yuan Yuan; Zhaolei Jiang; Ye Zhao; Wei-Chung Tsai; Jheel Patel; Lan S Chen; Changyu Shen; Shien-Fong Lin; Huei-Sheng Vincent Chen; Thomas H Everett; Michael C Fishbein; Zhenhui Chen; Peng-Sheng Chen Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Richard S Shelton; Masahiro Ogawa; Hongbo Lin; Changyu Shen; Johnson Wong; Shien-Fong Lin; Peng-Sheng Chen; Thomas H Everett Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2018-03-28
Authors: Andrea Uradu; Juyi Wan; Anisiia Doytchinova; Keith C Wright; Andrew Y T Lin; Lan S Chen; Changyu Shen; Shien-Fong Lin; Thomas H Everett; Peng-Sheng Chen Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Zhaolei Jiang; Ye Zhao; Anisiia Doytchinova; Nicholas J Kamp; Wei-Chung Tsai; Yuan Yuan; David Adams; David Wagner; Changyu Shen; Lan S Chen; Thomas H Everett; Shien-Fong Lin; Peng-Sheng Chen Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Ye Zhao; Neal X Chen; Jonathan T Shirazi; Changyu Shen; Shien-Fong Lin; Michael C Fishbein; Sharon M Moe; Peng-Sheng Chen Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Anisiia Doytchinova; Jonathan L Hassel; Yuan Yuan; Hongbo Lin; Dechun Yin; David Adams; Susan Straka; Keith Wright; Kimberly Smith; David Wagner; Changyu Shen; Vicenta Salanova; Chad Meshberger; Lan S Chen; John C Kincaid; Arthur C Coffey; Gang Wu; Yan Li; Richard J Kovacs; Thomas H Everett; Ronald Victor; Yong-Mei Cha; Shien-Fong Lin; Peng-Sheng Chen Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 6.343