Literature DB >> 25459752

N2O and CH4 emissions from a fallow-wheat rotation with low N input in conservation and conventional tillage under a Mediterranean agroecosystem.

Angela Tellez-Rio1, Sonia García-Marco2, Mariela Navas3, Emilia López-Solanilla3, Jose Luis Tenorio4, Antonio Vallejo2.   

Abstract

Conservation agriculture that includes no tillage (NT) or minimum tillage (MT) and crop rotation is an effective practice to increase soil organic matter in Mediterranean semiarid agrosystems. But the impact of these agricultural practices on greenhouse gases (GHGs), such as nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4), is variable depending mainly on soil structure and short/long-term tillage. The main objective of this study was to assess the long-term effect of three tillage systems (NT, MT and conventional tillage (CT)) and land-covers (fallow/wheat) on the emissions of N2O and CH4 in a low N input agricultural system during one year. This was achieved by measuring crop yields, soil mineral N and dissolved organic C contents, and fluxes of N2O and CH4. Total cumulative N2O emissions were not significantly different (P>0.05) among the tillage systems or between fallow and wheat. The only difference was produced in spring, when N2O emissions were significantly higher (P<0.05) in fallow than in wheat subplots, and NT reduced N2O emissions (P<0.05) compared with MT and CT. Taking into account the water filled pore space (WFPS), both nitrification and denitrification could have occurred during the experimental period. Denitrification capacity in March was similar in all tillage systems, in spite of the higher DOC content maintained in the topsoil of NT. This could be due to the similar denitrifier densities, targeted by nirK copy numbers at that time. Cumulative CH4 fluxes resulted in small net uptake for all treatments, and no significant differences were found among tillage systems or between fallow and wheat land-covers. These results suggest that under a coarse-textured soil in low N agricultural systems, the impact of tillage on GHG is very low and that the fallow cycle within a crop rotation is not a useful strategy to reduce GHG emissions.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CH(4) fluxes; Conventional tillage; Crop residue; Crop rotation; N(2)O emissions; No tillage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25459752     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  N2O emission characteristics and its affecting factors in rain-fed potato fields in Wuchuan County, China.

Authors:  Liwei Wang; Cheng Wang; Zhihua Pan; Hui Xu; Lin Gao; Peiyi Zhao; Zhiqiang Dong; Jingting Zhang; Guohui Cui; Sen Wang; Guolin Han; Hui Zhao
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Study on the Influencing Factors of Farmers' Adoption of Conservation Tillage Technology in Black Soil Region in China: A Logistic-ISM Model Approach.

Authors:  Hongpeng Guo; Wenkai Zhao; Chulin Pan; Guijie Qiu; Shuang Xu; Shun Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Impact of reduced tillage on greenhouse gas emissions and soil carbon stocks in an organic grass-clover ley - winter wheat cropping sequence.

Authors:  Maike Krauss; Reiner Ruser; Torsten Müller; Sissel Hansen; Paul Mäder; Andreas Gattinger
Journal:  Agric Ecosyst Environ       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.567

4.  Impact of agronomy practices on the effects of reduced tillage systems on CH4 and N2O emissions from agricultural fields: A global meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jinfei Feng; Fengbo Li; Xiyue Zhou; Chunchun Xu; Long Ji; Zhongdu Chen; Fuping Fang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Reduced greenhouse gas mitigation potential of no-tillage soils through earthworm activity.

Authors:  Ingrid M Lubbers; Kees Jan van Groenigen; Lijbert Brussaard; Jan Willem van Groenigen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.