Literature DB >> 25459595

Assessing bioresorbable coronary devices: methods and parameters.

Hector M Garcia-Garcia1, Patrick W Serruys2, Carlos M Campos3, Takashi Muramatsu2, Shimpei Nakatani2, Yao-Jun Zhang2, Yoshinobu Onuma2, Gregg W Stone4.   

Abstract

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) represent a novel approach to provide transient vessel support to drug-delivery capability without the long-term limitations of metallic drug-eluting stents (DES). The technology has the potential to overcome many of the safety concerns associated with metallic DES and possibly even convey further clinical benefit. In particular, the BRS are designed to provide short-term lumen support, and after being completely bioresorbed, eliminate the permanent caging typical of metallic DES. However, this technology has required new imaging modalities and methodologies for its assessment because the design, degradation rate, loss of mechanical property, and drug deliverability may affect its safety and efficacy. We provide an overview of all existing methods for assessing bioresorbable devices, from noninvasive to invasive, from light to sound based, and from morphological to functional parameters.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  bioresorbable scaffolds; coronary; imaging; intravascular ultrasound; multislice computed tomography; optical coherence tomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25459595     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  11 in total

Review 1.  Causes, assessment, and treatment of stent thrombosis--intravascular imaging insights.

Authors:  Daniel S Ong; Ik-Kyung Jang
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in coronary chronic total occlusions revascularization: safety assessment related to struts coverage and apposition in 6-month OCT follow-up.

Authors:  Rosa Alba Abellas-Sequeiros; Raymundo Ocaranza-Sanchez; Ramiro Trillo-Nouche; Carlos Gonzalez-Juanatey; Jose Ramon Gonzalez-Juanatey
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  A head to head comparison of XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold versus metallic sirolimus-eluting stent: 180 days follow-up in a porcine model.

Authors:  Li Shen; Yizhe Wu; Lei Ge; Yaojun Zhang; Qibing Wang; Juying Qian; Zhifen Qiu; Junbo Ge
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Mechanical behavior of polymer-based vs. metallic-based bioresorbable stents.

Authors:  Hui Ying Ang; Ying Ying Huang; Soo Teik Lim; Philip Wong; Michael Joner; Nicolas Foin
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Echogenicity as a surrogate for bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold degradation: analysis at 1-, 3-, 6-, 12- 18, 24-, 30-, 36- and 42-month follow-up in a porcine model.

Authors:  Carlos M Campos; Yuki Ishibashi; Jeroen Eggermont; Shimpei Nakatani; Yun Kyeong Cho; Jouke Dijkstra; Johan H C Reiber; Alexander Sheehy; Jennifer Lane; Marika Kamberi; Richard Rapoza; Laura Perkins; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Yoshinobu Onuma; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Conformability in everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds compared with metal platform coronary stents in long lesions.

Authors:  Jiang Ming Fam; Yuki Ishibashi; Cordula Felix; Bu Chun Zhang; Roberto Diletti; Nicolas van Mieghem; Evelyn Regar; Ron van Domburg; Yoshinobu Onuma; Robert-Jan van Geuns
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Bioresorbable scaffold implantation in STEMI patients: 5 years imaging subanalysis of PRAGUE-19 study.

Authors:  Viktor Kočka; Petr Toušek; Martin Kozel; Andrea Buono; Martin Hajšl; Libor Lisa; Tomáš Buděšínský; Martin Malý; Petr Widimský
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Interaction of Poly L-Lactide and Tungsten Disulfide Nanotubes Studied by in Situ X-ray Scattering during Expansion of PLLA/WS2NT Nanocomposite Tubes.

Authors:  Lison Rocher; Andrew S Ylitalo; Tiziana Di Luccio; Riccardo Miscioscia; Giovanni De Filippo; Giuseppe Pandolfi; Fulvia Villani; Alla Zak; Gary H Menary; Alex B Lennon; Julia A Kornfield
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.329

9.  A computational study of crimping and expansion of bioresorbable polymeric stents.

Authors:  T Y Qiu; M Song; L G Zhao
Journal:  Mech Time Depend Mater       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 10.  Bioresorbable Polymeric Scaffold in Cardiovascular Applications.

Authors:  Daniel Wee Yee Toong; Han Wei Toh; Jaryl Chen Koon Ng; Philip En Hou Wong; Hwa Liang Leo; Subramanian Venkatraman; Lay Poh Tan; Hui Ying Ang; Yingying Huang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.