Takumi Inami1, Masaharu Kataoka2, Nobuhiko Shimura1, Haruhisa Ishiguro1, Ryoji Yanagisawa1, Keiichi Fukuda3, Hideaki Yoshino1, Toru Satoh4. 1. Division of Cardiology, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Division of Cardiology, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: m.kataoka09@z5.keio.jp. 3. Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 4. Division of Cardiology, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: tsatoh@ks.kyorin-u.ac.jp.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to prove the safety and effectiveness of pressure-wire-guided percutaneous transluminal pulmonary angioplasty (PTPA). BACKGROUND: PTPA has been demonstrated to be effective for treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. However, a major and occasionally fatal complication after PTPA is reperfusion pulmonary edema. To avoid this, we developed the PEPSI (Pulmonary Edema Predictive Scoring Index). The pressure wire has been used to detect insufficiency of flow in a vessel. METHODS: We included 350 consecutive PTPA sessions in 103 patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2013. During these 5 years, 140 PTPA sessions were performed without guidance, 65 with guidance of PEPSI alone, and 145 with both PEPSI and pressure-wire guidance. Each PTPA session was finished after achieving PEPSI scores of <35.4 with PEPSI guidance and each target lesion achieving distal mean pulmonary arterial pressure <35 mm Hg with pressure-wire guidance. RESULTS: The occurrence of clinically critical reperfusion pulmonary edema and vessel injuries were lowest in the group using the guidance of both pressure wire and PEPSI (0% and 6.9%, respectively). Furthermore, the group guided by pressure wire and PEPSI accomplished the same hemodynamic improvements with fewer numbers of target lesions treated and sessions performed. CONCLUSIONS: The combined approach using pressure wire and PEPSI produced more efficient clinical results and greatly reduced reperfusion pulmonary edema and vessel complications. This is further evidence that PTPA is an alternative strategy for treating chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to prove the safety and effectiveness of pressure-wire-guided percutaneous transluminal pulmonary angioplasty (PTPA). BACKGROUND: PTPA has been demonstrated to be effective for treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. However, a major and occasionally fatal complication after PTPA is reperfusion pulmonary edema. To avoid this, we developed the PEPSI (Pulmonary Edema Predictive Scoring Index). The pressure wire has been used to detect insufficiency of flow in a vessel. METHODS: We included 350 consecutive PTPA sessions in 103 patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2013. During these 5 years, 140 PTPA sessions were performed without guidance, 65 with guidance of PEPSI alone, and 145 with both PEPSI and pressure-wire guidance. Each PTPA session was finished after achieving PEPSI scores of <35.4 with PEPSI guidance and each target lesion achieving distal mean pulmonary arterial pressure <35 mm Hg with pressure-wire guidance. RESULTS: The occurrence of clinically critical reperfusion pulmonary edema and vessel injuries were lowest in the group using the guidance of both pressure wire and PEPSI (0% and 6.9%, respectively). Furthermore, the group guided by pressure wire and PEPSI accomplished the same hemodynamic improvements with fewer numbers of target lesions treated and sessions performed. CONCLUSIONS: The combined approach using pressure wire and PEPSI produced more efficient clinical results and greatly reduced reperfusion pulmonary edema and vessel complications. This is further evidence that PTPA is an alternative strategy for treating chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
Authors: Jan B Hinrichs; Julius Renne; Marius M Hoeper; Karen M Olsson; Frank K Wacker; Bernhard C Meyer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Christian Schoenfeld; Jan B Hinrichs; Karen M Olsson; Martin-Alexander Kuettner; Julius Renne; Till Kaireit; Christoph Czerner; Frank Wacker; Marius M Hoeper; Bernhard C Meyer; Jens Vogel-Claussen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Sabine K Maschke; Julius Renne; Thomas Werncke; Karen M Olsson; Marius M Hoeper; Frank K Wacker; Bernhard C Meyer; Jan B Hinrichs Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-03-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Murat Sezer; Javier Escaned; Christopher J Broyd; Berrin Umman; Zehra Bugra; Ilke Ozcan; Mehmet Rasih Sonsoz; Alp Ozcan; Adem Atici; Emre Aslanger; Z Irem Sezer; Justin E Davies; Niels van Royen; Sabahattin Umman Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Sabine K Maschke; Jan B Hinrichs; Julius Renne; Thomas Werncke; Hinrich M B Winther; Kristina I Ringe; Karen M Olsson; Marius M Hoeper; Frank K Wacker; Bernhard C Meyer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 5.315