Literature DB >> 25458855

'Wasteaware' benchmark indicators for integrated sustainable waste management in cities.

David C Wilson1, Ljiljana Rodic2, Michael J Cowing3, Costas A Velis4, Andrew D Whiteman5, Anne Scheinberg6, Recaredo Vilches7, Darragh Masterson7, Joachim Stretz8, Barbara Oelz9.   

Abstract

This paper addresses a major problem in international solid waste management, which is twofold: a lack of data, and a lack of consistent data to allow comparison between cities. The paper presents an indicator set for integrated sustainable waste management (ISWM) in cities both North and South, to allow benchmarking of a city's performance, comparing cities and monitoring developments over time. It builds on pioneering work for UN-Habitat's solid waste management in the World's cities. The comprehensive analytical framework of a city's solid waste management system is divided into two overlapping 'triangles' - one comprising the three physical components, i.e. collection, recycling, and disposal, and the other comprising three governance aspects, i.e. inclusivity; financial sustainability; and sound institutions and proactive policies. The indicator set includes essential quantitative indicators as well as qualitative composite indicators. This updated and revised 'Wasteaware' set of ISWM benchmark indicators is the cumulative result of testing various prototypes in more than 50 cities around the world. This experience confirms the utility of indicators in allowing comprehensive performance measurement and comparison of both 'hard' physical components and 'soft' governance aspects; and in prioritising 'next steps' in developing a city's solid waste management system, by identifying both local strengths that can be built on and weak points to be addressed. The Wasteaware ISWM indicators are applicable to a broad range of cities with very different levels of income and solid waste management practices. Their wide application as a standard methodology will help to fill the historical data gap.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Benchmark indicators; Developing countries; Governance; Performance monitoring; Recycling rates; Solid waste management

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25458855     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  6 in total

1.  Approach to assess the performance of waste management systems towards a circular economy: waste management system development stage concept (WMS-DSC).

Authors:  Alessio Campitelli; Jan Kannengießer; Liselotte Schebek
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2022-02-17

2.  Appropriate solid waste management system in Quelimane (Mozambique): study and design of a small-scale center for plastic sorting with wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Francesca Villa; Giovanni Vinti; Mentore Vaccari
Journal:  Waste Dispos Sustain Energy       Date:  2022-02-21

3.  Toward a cleaner and more sustainable world: A framework to develop and improve waste management through organizations, governments and academia.

Authors:  Rafaela Garbelini Anuardo; Maximilian Espuny; Ana Carolina Ferreira Costa; Otávio José Oliveira
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-04-01

4.  Rural plastic emissions into the largest mountain lake of the Eastern Carpathians.

Authors:  Florin-Constantin Mihai
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 5.  Review of Current Healthcare Waste Management Methods and Their Effect on Global Health.

Authors:  Christina Kenny; Anushree Priyadarshini
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05

6.  Building sustainability indicators in the health dimension for solid waste management.

Authors:  Tatiane Bonametti Veiga; Silvano da Silva Coutinho; Silvia Carla Silva Andre; Adriana Aparecida Mendes; Angela Maria Magosso Takayanagui
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2016-08-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.