| Literature DB >> 25458542 |
C Rodríguez de Miguel1, A Serradesanferm2, M López-Cerón1, S Carballal1, A Pozo2, F Balaguer1, A Cárdenas1, G Fernández-Esparrach1, A Ginés1, B González-Suárez1, L Moreira1, I Ordás1, E Ricart1, O Sendino1, E C Vaquero1, M Ubré3, S del Manzano1, J Grau2, J Llach1, A Castells1, M Pellisé4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The quality of colon cleansing and the tolerability of anterograde preparation are essential to the success of colorectal cancer screening. AIM: To compare the tolerability and efficacy of low-volume preparations vs the standard regimen in individuals scheduled for an early morning colonoscopy. STUDY: Participants in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program using the fecal immunochemical test who were scheduled for a colonoscopy from 09:00 a.m. to 10:20 a.m. were prospectively included and assigned to: (1) control group (PEG-ELS 4L): PEG 4L and electrolytes; (2) group AscPEG-2L: a combination of PEG and ascorbic acid 2L; and (3) group PiMg: sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate 500 mL plus 2L of clear fluids. Tolerability was evaluated with a questionnaire and the quality of bowel preparation with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale.Entities:
Keywords: Bowel cleansing; Clinical trial; Colonoscopia; Colonoscopia de calidad; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer screening; Cribado de cáncer colorectal; Ensayo clínico; Preparación anterógrada; Preparation; Quality endoscopy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25458542 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2014.09.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastroenterol Hepatol ISSN: 0210-5705 Impact factor: 2.102