Agneta Hilding1, Chong Shen2, Claes-Göran Östenson3. 1. Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Endocrine and Diabetes Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Solna, Sweden. Electronic address: agneta.hilding@ki.se. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. 3. Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Endocrine and Diabetes Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Solna, Sweden.
Abstract
AIM: Explore if social network affects development of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Individuals with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 2924 women and 2039 men, aged 35-56 years, were followed-up 8-10 years later by an oral glucose tolerance test. Prediabetes and type 2 diabetes was then evident in 168 and 50 women and in 236 and 93 men, respectively. Measures of social network (AVSI-index (availability of social integration), civil status and participation in social activities), recorded by questionnaire at baseline, were evaluated by logistic regression. RESULTS: Having AVSI scores in the highest tertile was associated with a decreased risk to develop type 2 diabetes in women (age-adjusted odds ratio 0.41 [95% CI: 0.19-0.88]) less significant after full adjustment (0.50 [0.22-1.16]). Contrary, in men AVSI was associated with an increased risk to develop type 2 diabetes (1.93 [1.03-3.60]) after full adjustment. Participation in social activities decreased the risk to develop prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in women, (age-adjusted 0.65 [0.46-0.91] and 0.43 [0.24-0.77], respectively), less significant when adjusted for confounders (0.78 [0.54-1.12] and 0.59 [0.31-1.13]). In men a decreased risk was observed for prediabetes (0.59 [0.43-0.82] multi-adjusted model). Being married or living with a partner decreased type 2 diabetes risk only in men (0.57 [0.33-0.97] and 0.61 [0.34-1.08] age- and multi-adjusted models, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals having a social network seemed less likely to develop abnormal glucose regulation. Contradictory to an overall protective pattern of having a social network, high AVSI-index in men increased the risk to develop type 2 diabetes.
AIM: Explore if social network affects development of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Individuals with normal glucose tolerance at baseline, 2924 women and 2039 men, aged 35-56 years, were followed-up 8-10 years later by an oral glucose tolerance test. Prediabetes and type 2 diabetes was then evident in 168 and 50 women and in 236 and 93 men, respectively. Measures of social network (AVSI-index (availability of social integration), civil status and participation in social activities), recorded by questionnaire at baseline, were evaluated by logistic regression. RESULTS: Having AVSI scores in the highest tertile was associated with a decreased risk to develop type 2 diabetes in women (age-adjusted odds ratio 0.41 [95% CI: 0.19-0.88]) less significant after full adjustment (0.50 [0.22-1.16]). Contrary, in men AVSI was associated with an increased risk to develop type 2 diabetes (1.93 [1.03-3.60]) after full adjustment. Participation in social activities decreased the risk to develop prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in women, (age-adjusted 0.65 [0.46-0.91] and 0.43 [0.24-0.77], respectively), less significant when adjusted for confounders (0.78 [0.54-1.12] and 0.59 [0.31-1.13]). In men a decreased risk was observed for prediabetes (0.59 [0.43-0.82] multi-adjusted model). Being married or living with a partner decreased type 2 diabetes risk only in men (0.57 [0.33-0.97] and 0.61 [0.34-1.08] age- and multi-adjusted models, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals having a social network seemed less likely to develop abnormal glucose regulation. Contradictory to an overall protective pattern of having a social network, high AVSI-index in men increased the risk to develop type 2 diabetes.
Authors: Michael Hendryx; Wanda Nicholson; JoAnn E Manson; Candyce H Kroenke; Jennifer Lee; Julie C Weitlauf; Lorena Garcia; Junmei M Jonasson; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Juhua Luo Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Anna Serlachius; Marko Elovainio; Markus Juonala; Steven Shea; Matthew Sabin; Terho Lehtimäki; Olli Raitakari; Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen; Laura Pulkki-Råback Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2017-04
Authors: Sridharan Raghavan; Mark C Pachucki; Yuchiao Chang; Bianca Porneala; Caroline S Fox; Josée Dupuis; James B Meigs Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Stephanie Brinkhues; Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers; Christian J P A Hoebe; Carla J H van der Kallen; Pieter C Dagnelie; Annemarie Koster; Ronald M A Henry; Simone J S Sep; Nicolaas C Schaper; Coen D A Stehouwer; Hans Bosma; Paul H M Savelkoul; Miranda T Schram Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Miranda T Schram; Willem J J Assendelft; Theo G van Tilburg; Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 10.122