Danella Lubbe1, Ekta Lakhani2, James W Brantingham3, Gregory F Parkin-Smith4, Tammy K Cassa5, Gary A Globe6, Charmaine Korporaal7. 1. Practicing Chiropractor, Department of Chiropractic and Somatology, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa. 2. Practicing Chiropractor, Senior Lecturer, Department of Chiropractic and Somatology, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa. 3. Adjunct Associate Professor, School of Chiropractic and Sports Science, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia. Electronic address: jimbrant2002@yahoo.com. 4. General Practice and Emergency Medicine Registrar, Rockingham General Hospital, Rockingham, Australia. 5. Practicing Chiropractor, Erie, PA. 6. Director, Global Health Economics, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA. 7. Senior Lecturer, Durban University of Technology, Department of Chiropractic and Somatology, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare manipulative therapy (MT) plus rehabilitation to rehabilitation alone for recurrent ankle sprain with functional instability (RASFI) to determine short-term outcomes. METHODS: This was an assessor-blind, parallel-group randomized comparative trial. Thirty-three eligible participants with RASFI were randomly allocated to receive rehabilitation alone or chiropractic MT plus rehabilitation. All participants undertook a daily rehabilitation program over the course of the 4-week treatment period. The participants receiving MT had 6 treatments over the same treatment period. The primary outcome measures were the Foot and Ankle Disability Index and the visual analogue pain scale, with the secondary outcome measure being joint motion palpation. Data were collected at baseline and during week 5. Missing scores were replaced using a multiple imputation method. Statistical analysis of the data composed of repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Between-group analysis demonstrated a difference in scores at the final consultation for the visual analogue scale and frequency of joint motion restrictions (P ≤ .006) but not for the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (P = .26). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the patients with RASFI who receivedchiropractic MT plus rehabilitation showed significant short-term reduction in pain and the number of joint restrictions in the short-term but not disability when compared with rehabilitation alone.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare manipulative therapy (MT) plus rehabilitation to rehabilitation alone for recurrent ankle sprain with functional instability (RASFI) to determine short-term outcomes. METHODS: This was an assessor-blind, parallel-group randomized comparative trial. Thirty-three eligible participants with RASFI were randomly allocated to receive rehabilitation alone or chiropractic MT plus rehabilitation. All participants undertook a daily rehabilitation program over the course of the 4-week treatment period. The participants receiving MT had 6 treatments over the same treatment period. The primary outcome measures were the Foot and Ankle Disability Index and the visual analogue pain scale, with the secondary outcome measure being joint motion palpation. Data were collected at baseline and during week 5. Missing scores were replaced using a multiple imputation method. Statistical analysis of the data composed of repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Between-group analysis demonstrated a difference in scores at the final consultation for the visual analogue scale and frequency of joint motion restrictions (P ≤ .006) but not for the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (P = .26). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the patients with RASFI who received chiropractic MT plus rehabilitation showed significant short-term reduction in pain and the number of joint restrictions in the short-term but not disability when compared with rehabilitation alone.