Fateme Alipour1, Mahmoud Jabarvand Behrouz2, Behnaz Samet2. 1. Eye Research center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Electronic address: alipour@tums.ac.ir. 2. Eye Research center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate fitting feasibility, efficacy, and safety of mini scleral contact lenses in correcting post corneal graft vision. METHODS: Prospective interventional case series, 56 visually unsatisfied post corneal graft eyes of 45 patients were fitted with miniscleral lenses (15.8 mm). Keratometric values, UCVA and BSCVA, fit, best corrected vision with the lens, decision to order lens, comfortable daily wearing time (CDWT), contact lens handling issues, and contact lens related complications were documented. RESULTS: The mean age was 34.6 years (SD: 10.9), ranging from 8 to 63 years. Forty-three eyes had history of full thickness corneal graft, 12 eyes had deep anterior lamellar graft (DALK) and 1 eye had the rotational graft. The mean UCVA was 1.05 logMar (SD: 0.54), ranging from 0.30 to 2.52 logMar. The mean BSCVA was 0.73 logMar (SD: 0.50) ranging from 0.09 to 2.00 which improved to 0.17 logMar (SD: 0.19) with the miniscleral lens. All eyes had ideal (40 eyes) or acceptable (16 eyes) fits. Nineteen patients (23 eyes) ordered their lenses of whom 11 (14 eyes) continued using the lens with a mean follow up time of 21.92 months (SD: 6.8). These patients reported a mean CDWT of 9.62 h/day (SD: 4.5). Five eyes of 4 patients discontinued the lens. Four eyes were lost to follow-up. The main reported barriers for ordering the lenses were economic and handling concerns. CONCLUSION: Miniscleral contact lenses can be considered helpful in the visual management of post corneal graft patients. Other factors may influence the acceptance of the lenses.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate fitting feasibility, efficacy, and safety of mini scleral contact lenses in correcting post corneal graft vision. METHODS: Prospective interventional case series, 56 visually unsatisfied post corneal graft eyes of 45 patients were fitted with miniscleral lenses (15.8 mm). Keratometric values, UCVA and BSCVA, fit, best corrected vision with the lens, decision to order lens, comfortable daily wearing time (CDWT), contact lens handling issues, and contact lens related complications were documented. RESULTS: The mean age was 34.6 years (SD: 10.9), ranging from 8 to 63 years. Forty-three eyes had history of full thickness corneal graft, 12 eyes had deep anterior lamellar graft (DALK) and 1 eye had the rotational graft. The mean UCVA was 1.05 logMar (SD: 0.54), ranging from 0.30 to 2.52 logMar. The mean BSCVA was 0.73 logMar (SD: 0.50) ranging from 0.09 to 2.00 which improved to 0.17 logMar (SD: 0.19) with the miniscleral lens. All eyes had ideal (40 eyes) or acceptable (16 eyes) fits. Nineteen patients (23 eyes) ordered their lenses of whom 11 (14 eyes) continued using the lens with a mean follow up time of 21.92 months (SD: 6.8). These patients reported a mean CDWT of 9.62 h/day (SD: 4.5). Five eyes of 4 patients discontinued the lens. Four eyes were lost to follow-up. The main reported barriers for ordering the lenses were economic and handling concerns. CONCLUSION: Miniscleral contact lenses can be considered helpful in the visual management of post corneal graft patients. Other factors may influence the acceptance of the lenses.