Literature DB >> 25457342

Clinical results of acetabular fracture management with the Pararectus approach.

Marius Johann Baptist Keel, Salvatore Tomagra, Harald Marcel Bonel, Klaus Arno Siebenrock, Johannes Dominik Bastian.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To present the accuracy of reduction, complications and results two years after open reduction and internal fixation of displaced acetabular fractures involving the anterior column (AC) through the Pararectus approach. Frequencies for conversion to total hip replacement in the early follow up, the clinical outcome in preserved hips, and the need for an extension of the approach (1st window of the ilioinguinal approach) are compared to the literature about the modified Stoppa approach.
METHODS: Forty-eight patients (mean age 62 years, range: 16–98; 41 male) with displaced acetabular fractures involving the AC (AC: n = 9; transverse fracture: n = 2; AC and hemitransverse: n = 24; both column: n = 13) were treated between 12/2009 and 12/2011 using the Pararectus approach. Surgical data and accuracy of reduction (using computed tomography) were assessed. Patients were routinely followed up at eight weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Failure was defined as the need for total hip arthroplasty. Twenty-four months postoperatively the outcome was rated according to Matta.
RESULTS: In four patients there were four intraoperative complications (minor vascular damage in two, small perforations of the peritoneum in two) which were managed intraoperatively. Fracture reduction showed statistically significant decreases (mean ± SD, pre- vs. postoperative, in mm) in “step-offs”: 2.6 ± 1.9 vs. 0.1 ± 0.3, p < 0.001 and “gaps”: 11.2 ± 6.8 vs. 0.7 ± 0.9, p < 0.001. Accuracy of reduction was “anatomical” in 45, “imperfect” in three. Five (13%) from 38 available patients required a total hip arthroplasty. Of 33 patients with a preserved hip the clinical outcome was graded as “excellent” in 13 or “good” in 20; radiographically, 27 were graded as “excellent”, four as “good” and two as “fair”. An extension of the approach was infrequently used (1st window ilioinguinal approach in 2%, mini-incision at the iliac crest in 21%).
CONCLUSION: In the treatment of acetabular fractures involving the anterior column the Pararectus approach allowed for anatomic restoration with minimal access morbidity. Results obtained by means of the Pararectus approach after two years at least parallel those reported after utilisation of the modified Stoppa approach. In contrast to the modified Stoppa approach, a relevant extension of the Pararectus approach was almost not necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25457342     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  19 in total

1.  Periacetabular osteotomy through the pararectus approach: technical feasibility and control of fragment mobility by a validated surgical navigation system in a cadaver experiment.

Authors:  Li Liu; Guoyan Zheng; Johannes Dominik Bastian; Marius Johann Baptist Keel; Lutz Peter Nolte; Klaus Arno Siebenrock; Timo Michael Ecker
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Management of anterior associated types of acetabular fractures utilizing the modified Stoppa and the pararectus approaches: a prospective cohort study and early experience from a level one Egyptian trauma centre.

Authors:  Ali Fergany; Ahmed A Khalifa; Aly Mohamedean; Faisal Fahmy Adam; Osama Farouk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Treatment of acetabular fracture involving anterior and posterior columns using a single pararectus approach: surgical experience and preliminary results.

Authors:  Tianlong Wang; Xiaodong Hou; Zifei Zhou; Junfeng Liu; Shaodi Zhang; Shuo Ge; Shaohua Jia; Longpo Zheng
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  The Pararectus Approach: A New Concept.

Authors:  Marius J B Keel; Klaus-Arno Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast; Johannes D Bastian
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2018-07-25

5.  Clinical Results of Acetabular Fracture via the Pararectus versus Ilioinguinal Approach.

Authors:  Ruyi Zou; Min Wu; Jianzhong Guan; Yuzhou Xiao; Xiaotian Chen
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.071

6.  Secure Screw Placement in Management of Acetabular Fractures Using the Suprapectineal Quadrilateral Buttress Plate.

Authors:  R J Egli; M J B Keel; J L Cullmann; J D Bastian
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Treatment of acetabular fractures in older patients-introduction of a new implant for primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Resch; D Krappinger; P Moroder; A Auffarth; M Blauth; J Becker
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  The safe screw path along inferior border of the arcuate line at acetabular area: an anatomical study based on CT scans.

Authors:  Chun Bi; Jiandong Wang; Xiaoxi Ji; Zhijian Ma; Fang Wang; Xiangsen Zeng; Dongmei Wang; Qiugen Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  A Single Lateral Rectus Abdominis Approach for the Surgical Treatment of Complicated Acetabular Fractures: A Clinical Evaluation Study of 59 Patients.

Authors:  Canbin Wang; Han Liu; Xuezhi Lin; Jiahui Chen; Tao Li; Qiguang Mai; Shicai Fan
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-10-12

10.  The pararectus approach for internal fixation of acetabular fractures involving the anterior column: evaluating the functional outcome.

Authors:  Christian von Rüden; Lisa Wenzel; Johannes Becker; Andreas Thannheimer; Peter Augat; Alexander Woltmann; Volker Bühren; Mario Perl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.