Sergio Manzano-Fernández1, José M Andreu-Cayuelas1, Francisco Marín1, Esteban Orenes-Piñero1, Pilar Gallego2, Mariano Valdés1, Vicente Vicente3, Gregory Y H Lip4, Vanessa Roldán3. 1. Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria, Murcia, Spain. 2. Servicio de Hematología, Hospital Rafael Méndez, Lorca, Murcia, Spain. 3. Unidad de Hematología y Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain. 4. Haemostasis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology Unit, University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: g.y.h.lip@bham.ac.uk.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: New oral anticoagulants require dosing adjustment according to renal function. We aimed to determine discordance in hypothetical recommended dosing of these drugs using different estimated glomerular filtration rate equations in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of 910 patients with atrial fibrillation and an indication for oral anticoagulation. The glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations. For dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban we identified dose discordance when there was disagreement in the recommended dose based on different equations. RESULTS: Among the overall population, relative to Cockcroft-Gault, discordance in dabigatran dosage was 11.4% for Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and 10% for Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, discordance in rivaroxaban dosage was 10% for Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and 8.5% for the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. The lowest discordance was observed for apixaban: 1.4% for Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and 1.5% for the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. In patients with Cockcroft-Gault<60mL/min or elderly patients, discordances in dabigatran and rivaroxaban dosages were higher, ranging from 13.2% to 30.4%. Discordance in apixaban dosage remained<5% in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Discordance in new oral anticoagulation dosages using different equations is frequent, especially among elderly patients with renal impairment. This discordance was higher in dabigatran and rivaroxaban dosages than in apixaban dosages. Further studies are needed to clarify the clinical importance of these discordances and the optimal anticoagulant dosages depending on the use of different equations to estimate renal function.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: New oral anticoagulants require dosing adjustment according to renal function. We aimed to determine discordance in hypothetical recommended dosing of these drugs using different estimated glomerular filtration rate equations in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of 910 patients with atrial fibrillation and an indication for oral anticoagulation. The glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations. For dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban we identified dose discordance when there was disagreement in the recommended dose based on different equations. RESULTS: Among the overall population, relative to Cockcroft-Gault, discordance in dabigatran dosage was 11.4% for Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and 10% for Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, discordance in rivaroxaban dosage was 10% for Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and 8.5% for the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. The lowest discordance was observed for apixaban: 1.4% for Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and 1.5% for the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. In patients with Cockcroft-Gault<60mL/min or elderly patients, discordances in dabigatran and rivaroxaban dosages were higher, ranging from 13.2% to 30.4%. Discordance in apixaban dosage remained<5% in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Discordance in new oral anticoagulation dosages using different equations is frequent, especially among elderly patients with renal impairment. This discordance was higher in dabigatran and rivaroxaban dosages than in apixaban dosages. Further studies are needed to clarify the clinical importance of these discordances and the optimal anticoagulant dosages depending on the use of different equations to estimate renal function.
Authors: Anum S Minhas; Qingmei Jiang; Xiaokui Gu; Brian Haymart; Eva Kline-Rogers; Steve Almany; Jay Kozlowski; Gregory D Krol; Scott Kaatz; James B Froehlich; Geoffrey D Barnes Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Mintu P Turakhia; Peter J Blankestijn; Juan-Jesus Carrero; Catherine M Clase; Rajat Deo; Charles A Herzog; Scott E Kasner; Rod S Passman; Roberto Pecoits-Filho; Holger Reinecke; Gautam R Shroff; Wojciech Zareba; Michael Cheung; David C Wheeler; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Christoph Wanner Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Giuseppe Boriani; Cécile Laroche; Igor Diemberger; Mircea Ioachim Popescu; Lars Hvilsted Rasmussen; Lucian Petrescu; Harry J G M Crijns; Luigi Tavazzi; Aldo P Maggioni; Gregory Y H Lip Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 4.379