Bruno Coudert1, Jean-Yves Pierga2, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier3, Kaldoun Kerrou4, Jean-Marc Ferrero5, Thierry Petit6, Pierre Kerbrat7, Pierre-François Dupré8, Thomas Bachelot9, Philippe Gabelle10, Sylvia Giard11, David Coeffic12, Philippe Bougnoux13, Jean-Briac Prevost14, Gilles Paintaud15, Gilles Thibault16, Juana Hernandez17, Mathieu Coudert18, Laurent Arnould19, Alina Berriolo-Riedinger20. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France. Electronic address: bcoudert@cgfl.fr. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France. 3. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hopital Tenon, Paris, France. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, France. 6. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France. 7. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France. 8. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Augustin-Morvan, Brest, France. 9. Department of Medical Oncology et Unité INSERM U590, Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France. 10. Department of Surgery, Institut Daniel Hollard, Grenoble, France. 11. Department of Surgery, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France. 12. Department of Medical Oncology, Clinique Hartmann, Neuilly sur Seine, France. 13. Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Bretonneau, Tours, France. 14. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Pierre Curie, Beuvry, France. 15. Université François-Rabelais de Tours, CNRS, GICC UMR 7292, CHRU de Tours, Laboratory of Pharmacology-Toxicology, Tours, France. 16. Immunology Department, CHU Bretonneau, Tours, France. 17. Roche Laboratory, Boulogne Billancourt, France. 18. Experis IT, Nanterre, France. 19. Department of Pathology, Centre Georges-Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France. 20. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Georges-Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An effective and well tolerated treatment is needed for patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer who do not achieve a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. The AVATAXHER trial aimed to predict pathological complete response early with the use of PET and to investigate whether the addition of bevacizumab could improve the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response in patients unlikely to respond to treatment. METHODS: AVATAXHER was a randomised, open-label, non-comparative, multicentre phase 2 study that enrolled women (≥18 years of age) with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer from 26 oncology centres in France. Patients initially received two cycles of neoadjuvant docetaxel (100 mg/m(2) intravenously every 3 weeks) plus trastuzumab (8 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks then 6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks for the second course). Before the first and second cycles, [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET was done and the change in standardised uptake value was used to predict pathological complete response in each patient. Patients who were predicted to be responders on PET continued to receive standard therapy. Predicted non-responders were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive four cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m(2) intravenously every 3 weeks) and trastuzumab (6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks; group A) or continue on docetaxel plus trastuzumab alone (group B). Randomisation was open label and was done by an adaptive minimisation method. Although investigators and patients were aware of group assignment, the anatomo-pathologist in charge of centralised review of surgical samples and lymph nodes was masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was centrally assessed pathological complete response according to the Chevallier classification. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses in this Article were done on all patients who received at least one dose of treatment starting from cycle 3. Survival outcomes are not yet mature. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01142778) and EUDRACT (2009-013410-26). FINDINGS:Between May 19, 2010, and Oct 1, 2012, 152 patients were recruited for the study. Ten patients were subsequently excluded, leaving 142 patients in the intention-to-treat population. Of these 142 patients, 69 were predicted by [(18)F]-FDG PET to be treatment responders after two cycles of treatment. The 73 predicted non-responders were randomly assigned to group A (n=48) and group B (n=25). Pathological complete responses were noted in 37 (53·6%, 95% CI 41·2-65·7) of the PET responders, 21 (43·8%, 29·5-58·8) of those in group A, and six (24·0%, 9·4-45·1) of those in group B. Incidences of grade 3-4 adverse events were similar in all three groups. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (four in PET responders, five in group A, and three in group B), febrile neutropenia (one, three, and one, respectively), and myalgia (four, none, and one, respectively). Overall, 24 serious adverse events were reported in 15 patients (PET responders: nine events in four [6%] of 67 patients; group A: 14 events in ten [21%] of 47 patients; group B: one event in one [4%] of 25 patients). No deaths occurred during the study. INTERPRETATION: In patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, early PET assessment can help to identify non-responders to neoadjuvant docetaxel plus trastuzumab therapy. In these patients, the addition of bevacizumab can increase the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response. This potential new role for PET and the activity of bevacizumab in this setting need to be confirmed in larger phase 3 trials. FUNDING: Roche France.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: An effective and well tolerated treatment is needed for patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer who do not achieve a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. The AVATAXHER trial aimed to predict pathological complete response early with the use of PET and to investigate whether the addition of bevacizumab could improve the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response in patients unlikely to respond to treatment. METHODS:AVATAXHER was a randomised, open-label, non-comparative, multicentre phase 2 study that enrolled women (≥18 years of age) with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer from 26 oncology centres in France. Patients initially received two cycles of neoadjuvant docetaxel (100 mg/m(2) intravenously every 3 weeks) plus trastuzumab (8 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks then 6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks for the second course). Before the first and second cycles, [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET was done and the change in standardised uptake value was used to predict pathological complete response in each patient. Patients who were predicted to be responders on PET continued to receive standard therapy. Predicted non-responders were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive four cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m(2) intravenously every 3 weeks) and trastuzumab (6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks; group A) or continue on docetaxel plus trastuzumab alone (group B). Randomisation was open label and was done by an adaptive minimisation method. Although investigators and patients were aware of group assignment, the anatomo-pathologist in charge of centralised review of surgical samples and lymph nodes was masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was centrally assessed pathological complete response according to the Chevallier classification. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses in this Article were done on all patients who received at least one dose of treatment starting from cycle 3. Survival outcomes are not yet mature. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01142778) and EUDRACT (2009-013410-26). FINDINGS: Between May 19, 2010, and Oct 1, 2012, 152 patients were recruited for the study. Ten patients were subsequently excluded, leaving 142 patients in the intention-to-treat population. Of these 142 patients, 69 were predicted by [(18)F]-FDG PET to be treatment responders after two cycles of treatment. The 73 predicted non-responders were randomly assigned to group A (n=48) and group B (n=25). Pathological complete responses were noted in 37 (53·6%, 95% CI 41·2-65·7) of the PET responders, 21 (43·8%, 29·5-58·8) of those in group A, and six (24·0%, 9·4-45·1) of those in group B. Incidences of grade 3-4 adverse events were similar in all three groups. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (four in PET responders, five in group A, and three in group B), febrile neutropenia (one, three, and one, respectively), and myalgia (four, none, and one, respectively). Overall, 24 serious adverse events were reported in 15 patients (PET responders: nine events in four [6%] of 67 patients; group A: 14 events in ten [21%] of 47 patients; group B: one event in one [4%] of 25 patients). No deaths occurred during the study. INTERPRETATION: In patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, early PET assessment can help to identify non-responders to neoadjuvant docetaxel plus trastuzumab therapy. In these patients, the addition of bevacizumab can increase the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response. This potential new role for PET and the activity of bevacizumab in this setting need to be confirmed in larger phase 3 trials. FUNDING: Roche France.
Authors: James C Davis; Najat C Daw; Fariba Navid; Catherine A Billups; Jianrong Wu; Armita Bahrami; Jesse J Jenkins; Scott E Snyder; Wilburn E Reddick; Victor M Santana; M Beth McCarville; Junyu Guo; Barry L Shulkin Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Tessa G Steenbruggen; Mette S van Ramshorst; Marleen Kok; Sabine C Linn; Carolien H Smorenburg; Gabe S Sonke Journal: Drugs Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Chengeng Zeng; Paul E Kinahan; Hua Qian; Robert L Harrison; Kyle M Champley; Lawrence R MacDonald Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2017-10-30