Ivana Sestak1, Shalini Singh2, Jack Cuzick2, Glen M Blake3, Rajesh Patel4, Fatma Gossiel5, Rob Coleman6, Mitch Dowsett7, John F Forbes8, Anthony Howell9, Richard Eastell5. 1. Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University London, London, UK. Electronic address: i.sestak@qmul.ac.uk. 2. Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University London, London, UK. 3. Biomedical Engineering Department, King's College London, London, UK. 4. Imperial College London, London, UK. 5. Department of Human Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. 6. Department of Oncology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. 7. Academic Department of Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK. 8. University of Newcastle, Calvary Mater Hospital, Australia New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. 9. Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, Manchester, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors prevent breast cancer in postmenopausal women at high risk of the disease but are associated with accelerated bone loss. We assessed effectiveness of oral risedronate for prevention of reduction in bone mineral density (BMD) after 3 years of follow-up in a subset of patients in the IBIS-II trial. METHODS: The double-blind IBIS-II trial recruited 3864 healthy, postmenopausal women at increased risk of breast cancer and randomly allocated them oral anastrozole (1 mg/day) or matched placebo. 1410 (36%) postmenopausal women were then enrolled in a bone substudy and stratified at baseline according to their lowest baseline T score at spine or femoral neck (stratum I: T score at least -1·0; stratum II: T score at least -2·5 but less than -1·0; stratum III: T score less than -2·5 but greater than -4·0). Women in stratum I were monitored only; women in stratum III were all given risedronate (35 mg/week). Women in stratum II were randomly assigned (1:1) to risedronate (35 mg/week) or matched placebo by use of a block randomisation schedule via a web-based programme. The primary outcome of this per-protocol analysis (done with all women with a baseline and 3 year DXA assessment) was the effect of risedronate versus placebo for osteopenic women in stratum II randomly allocated to anastrozole (1 mg/day). Secondary outcomes included effect of anastrozole (1 mg/day) on BMD in women not receiving risedronate (strata I and II) and in osteoporotic women who were all treated with risedronate (stratum III). The trial is ongoing, but no longer recruiting. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN31488319. FINDINGS: Between Feb 2, 2003, and Sept 30, 2010, 150 (58%) of 260 women in stratum II who had been randomly allocated to anastrozole and either risedronate or placebo had baseline and 3 year assessments. At the lumbar spine, 3 year mean BMD change for the 77 women receiving anastrozole/risedronate was 1·1% (95% CI 0·2 to 2·1) versus -2·6% (-4·0 to -1·3) for the 73 women receiving anastrozole/placebo (p<0·0001). For the total hip, 3 year mean BMD change for women receiving anastrozole/risedronate was -0·7% (-1·6 to 0·2) versus -3·5% (-4·6 to -2·3) for women receiving anastrozole/placebo (p=0·0001). 652 (65%) of 1008 women in strata I and II who were not randomly allocated to risedronate had both baseline and 3 year assessments. Women not receiving risedronate in stratum I and II who received anastrozole (310 women) had a significant BMD decrease after 3 years of follow-up compared with women who received placebo (342 women) at the lumbar spine (-4·0% [-4·5 to -3·4] vs -1·2% [-1·7 to -0·7], p<0·0001) and total hip (-4·0% [-4·4 to -3·6] vs -1·8% [-2·1 to -1·4], p<0·0001). 106 (79%) of 149 women in stratum III had a baseline and a 3 year assessment. The 46 women allocated to anastrozole had a modest BMD increase of 1·2% (-0·1 to 2·6) at the spine compared with a 3·9% (2·6 to 5·2) increase for the 60 women allocated to placebo (p=0·006). For the total hip, a small 0·3% (-0·9 to 1·5) increase was noted for women allocated anastrozole compared with a 1·5% (0·5 to 2·5) increase for women allocated placebo, but the difference was not significant (p=0·12). The most common adverse event reported was arthralgia (stratum I: 94 placebo and 114 anastrozole; stratum II: 39 placebo/placebo, 25 placebo/risedronate, 34 anastrozole/placebo, and 34 anastrozole/risedronate; stratum III: 21 placebo/risedronate, 17 anastrozole/risedronate). Other adverse events included hot flushes, alopecia, abdominal pain, and back pain. INTERPRETATION: Risedronate counterbalances the effect of anastrozole-induced bone loss in osteopenic and osteoporotic women and might be offered in combination with anastrozole treatment to provide an improved risk-benefit profile. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK (C569/A5032), National Health and Medical Research Council Australia (GNT300755, GNT569213), Sanofi-Aventis, and AstraZeneca.
BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors prevent breast cancer in postmenopausal women at high risk of the disease but are associated with accelerated bone loss. We assessed effectiveness of oral risedronate for prevention of reduction in bone mineral density (BMD) after 3 years of follow-up in a subset of patients in the IBIS-II trial. METHODS: The double-blind IBIS-II trial recruited 3864 healthy, postmenopausal women at increased risk of breast cancer and randomly allocated them oral anastrozole (1 mg/day) or matched placebo. 1410 (36%) postmenopausal women were then enrolled in a bone substudy and stratified at baseline according to their lowest baseline T score at spine or femoral neck (stratum I: T score at least -1·0; stratum II: T score at least -2·5 but less than -1·0; stratum III: T score less than -2·5 but greater than -4·0). Women in stratum I were monitored only; women in stratum III were all given risedronate (35 mg/week). Women in stratum II were randomly assigned (1:1) to risedronate (35 mg/week) or matched placebo by use of a block randomisation schedule via a web-based programme. The primary outcome of this per-protocol analysis (done with all women with a baseline and 3 year DXA assessment) was the effect of risedronate versus placebo for osteopenic women in stratum II randomly allocated to anastrozole (1 mg/day). Secondary outcomes included effect of anastrozole (1 mg/day) on BMD in women not receiving risedronate (strata I and II) and in osteoporotic women who were all treated with risedronate (stratum III). The trial is ongoing, but no longer recruiting. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN31488319. FINDINGS: Between Feb 2, 2003, and Sept 30, 2010, 150 (58%) of 260 women in stratum II who had been randomly allocated to anastrozole and either risedronate or placebo had baseline and 3 year assessments. At the lumbar spine, 3 year mean BMD change for the 77 women receiving anastrozole/risedronate was 1·1% (95% CI 0·2 to 2·1) versus -2·6% (-4·0 to -1·3) for the 73 women receiving anastrozole/placebo (p<0·0001). For the total hip, 3 year mean BMD change for women receiving anastrozole/risedronate was -0·7% (-1·6 to 0·2) versus -3·5% (-4·6 to -2·3) for women receiving anastrozole/placebo (p=0·0001). 652 (65%) of 1008 women in strata I and II who were not randomly allocated to risedronate had both baseline and 3 year assessments. Women not receiving risedronate in stratum I and II who received anastrozole (310 women) had a significant BMD decrease after 3 years of follow-up compared with women who received placebo (342 women) at the lumbar spine (-4·0% [-4·5 to -3·4] vs -1·2% [-1·7 to -0·7], p<0·0001) and total hip (-4·0% [-4·4 to -3·6] vs -1·8% [-2·1 to -1·4], p<0·0001). 106 (79%) of 149 women in stratum III had a baseline and a 3 year assessment. The 46 women allocated to anastrozole had a modest BMD increase of 1·2% (-0·1 to 2·6) at the spine compared with a 3·9% (2·6 to 5·2) increase for the 60 women allocated to placebo (p=0·006). For the total hip, a small 0·3% (-0·9 to 1·5) increase was noted for women allocated anastrozole compared with a 1·5% (0·5 to 2·5) increase for women allocated placebo, but the difference was not significant (p=0·12). The most common adverse event reported was arthralgia (stratum I: 94 placebo and 114 anastrozole; stratum II: 39 placebo/placebo, 25 placebo/risedronate, 34 anastrozole/placebo, and 34 anastrozole/risedronate; stratum III: 21 placebo/risedronate, 17 anastrozole/risedronate). Other adverse events included hot flushes, alopecia, abdominal pain, and back pain. INTERPRETATION: Risedronate counterbalances the effect of anastrozole-induced bone loss in osteopenic and osteoporotic women and might be offered in combination with anastrozole treatment to provide an improved risk-benefit profile. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK (C569/A5032), National Health and Medical Research Council Australia (GNT300755, GNT569213), Sanofi-Aventis, and AstraZeneca.
Authors: Brent O'Carrigan; Matthew Hf Wong; Melina L Willson; Martin R Stockler; Nick Pavlakis; Annabel Goodwin Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-10-30
Authors: S L Greenspan; K T Vujevich; A Brufsky; B C Lembersky; G J van Londen; R C Jankowitz; S L Puhalla; P Rastogi; S Perera Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Mary Jane De Souza; Nicole C A Strock; Connie J Rogers; Nancy I Williams; Mario G Ferruzzi; Cindy H Nakatsu; Abigayle M R Simpson; Connie Weaver Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2022-05-28
Authors: F Vescini; R Attanasio; A Balestrieri; F Bandeira; S Bonadonna; V Camozzi; S Cassibba; R Cesareo; I Chiodini; C Maria Francucci; L Gianotti; F Grimaldi; R Guglielmi; B Madeo; C Marcocci; A Palermo; A Scillitani; E Vignali; V Rochira; M Zini Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Peyman Hadji; Matti S Aapro; Jean-Jacques Body; Michael Gnant; Maria Luisa Brandi; Jean Yves Reginster; M Carola Zillikens; Claus-C Glüer; Tobie de Villiers; Rod Baber; G David Roodman; Cyrus Cooper; Bente Langdahl; Santiago Palacios; John Kanis; Nasser Al-Daghri; Xavier Nogues; Erik Fink Eriksen; Andreas Kurth; Rene Rizzoli; Robert E Coleman Journal: J Bone Oncol Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 4.072
Authors: Cody Ramin; Betty J May; Richard B S Roden; Mikiaila M Orellana; Brenna C Hogan; Michelle S McCullough; Dana Petry; Deborah K Armstrong; Kala Visvanathan Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Yongsik Jung; Soo Jung Lee; Juneyoung Lee; Woo Chul Noh; Seok Jin Nam; Byeong-Woo Park; Young Tae Bae; Sung-Soo Kang; Heung Kyu Park; Jung-Han Yoon; Je Ryong Kim; Se Hun Cho; Lee Su Kim; Byung In Moon; Sung Hoo Jung; Chol Wan Lim; Sung Yong Kim; Ho Yong Park; Jeongyoon Song; Kwang Man Lee; Sung Hwan Park; Joon Jeong; Hae Lin Park; Sung Won Kim; Beom Seok Kwak; Sun Hee Kang; Young Up Cho; Geum Hee Gwak; Yong Lae Park; Sang Wook Kim; Sehwan Han Journal: J Breast Cancer Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 3.588