Herbert Silverstein1, Yi-Hsuan Emmy Wu2, Suzannah Hagan3. 1. Ear Research Foundation, 1901 Floyd Street, Sarasota, FL, USA. Electronic address: EarSinus@aol.com. 2. Ear Research Foundation, 1901 Floyd Street, Sarasota, FL, USA. Electronic address: emmy.wu@gmail.com. 3. Ear Research Foundation, 1901 Floyd Street, Sarasota, FL, USA. Electronic address: shagan@earsinus.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To present the outcomes of two patients (three ears) with hyperacusis treated with round and oval window reinforcement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Transcanal placement of temporalis fascia on the round window membrane and stapes footplate was performed. Loudness discomfort level testing was performed. Results of pre and post-operative hyperacusis questionnaires and audiometric testing were reviewed. RESULTS: Two patients (three ears) underwent surgery. Results from the hyperacusis questionnaire improved by 21 and 13 points, respectively. Except for a mild loss in the high frequencies, no change in hearing was noted post-operatively. Both patients reported no negative effects from surgery, marked improvement in ability to tolerate noise, and would recommend the procedure to others. There were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: Round and oval window reinforcement is a minimally invasive option for treating hyperacusis when usual medical therapies fail. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the procedure in reducing noise intolerance.
PURPOSE: To present the outcomes of two patients (three ears) with hyperacusis treated with round and oval window reinforcement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Transcanal placement of temporalis fascia on the round window membrane and stapes footplate was performed. Loudness discomfort level testing was performed. Results of pre and post-operative hyperacusis questionnaires and audiometric testing were reviewed. RESULTS: Two patients (three ears) underwent surgery. Results from the hyperacusis questionnaire improved by 21 and 13 points, respectively. Except for a mild loss in the high frequencies, no change in hearing was noted post-operatively. Both patients reported no negative effects from surgery, marked improvement in ability to tolerate noise, and would recommend the procedure to others. There were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: Round and oval window reinforcement is a minimally invasive option for treating hyperacusis when usual medical therapies fail. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the procedure in reducing noise intolerance.
Authors: Miranda Morrison; Athanasia Korda; Franca Wagner; Marco Domenico Caversaccio; Georgios Mantokoudis Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Kathryn Fackrell; Iskra Potgieter; Giriraj S Shekhawat; David M Baguley; Magdalena Sereda; Derek J Hoare Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-10-09 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Ektor Tsuneo Onishi; Cláudia Couto de Barros Coelho; Jeanne Oiticica; Ricardo Rodrigues Figueiredo; Rita de Cassia Cassou Guimarães; Tanit Ganz Sanchez; Adriana Lima Gürtler; Alessandra Ramos Venosa; André Luiz Lopes Sampaio; Andreia Aparecida Azevedo; Anna Paula Batista de Ávila Pires; Bruno Borges de Carvalho Barros; Carlos Augusto Costa Pires de Oliveira; Clarice Saba; Fernando Kaoru Yonamine; Ítalo Roberto Torres de Medeiros; Letícia Petersen Schmidt Rosito; Marcelo José Abras Rates; Márcia Akemi Kii; Mariana Lopes Fávero; Mônica Alcantara de Oliveira Santos; Osmar Clayton Person; Patrícia Ciminelli; Renata de Almeida Marcondes; Ronaldo Kennedy de Paula Moreira; Sandro de Menezes Santos Torres Journal: Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2017-12-24