Literature DB >> 25456019

Determinants of the choice of GP practice registration in England: evidence from a discrete choice experiment.

Mylene Lagarde1, Bob Erens2, Nicholas Mays2.   

Abstract

There have been growing concerns that general practitioner (GP) services in England, which are based on registration with a single practice located near the patient's home, are not sufficiently convenient for patients. To inform the decision as to whether to change registration rules allowing patients to register 'out-of-area' and to estimate the demand for this wider choice, we undertook a discrete choice experiment with 1706 respondents. Latent class models were used to analyse preferences for GP practice registration comparing preferences for neighbourhood and non-neighbourhood practices. We find that there is some appetite for registering outside the neighbourhood, but this preference is not uniformly shared across the population. Specifically individuals who are less mobile (e.g. older people and those with caring responsibilities), or satisfied with their local practice are less likely to be interested in registering at a practice outside their neighbourhood. Overall, people feel most strongly about obtaining an appointment with a GP as quickly as possible. Respondents regarded weekend opening as less important than other factors, and particularly less important than extended practice opening hours from Monday to Friday. Assuming a constant demand for GP services, a policy encouraging GP practices to extend their opening hours during the week is likely to decrease the average patient waiting time for an appointment and is likely to be preferred by patients.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discrete choice experiment; England; Health care reform; Primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25456019     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  12 in total

1.  Spatial Accessibility of Primary Care in England: A Cross-Sectional Study Using a Floating Catchment Area Method.

Authors:  Jan Bauer; Ruth Müller; Dörthe Brüggmann; David A Groneberg
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Using Latent Class Analysis to Model Preference Heterogeneity in Health: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mo Zhou; Winter Maxwell Thayer; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Patients' experiences of the choice of GP practice pilot, 2012/2013: a mixed methods evaluation.

Authors:  Stefanie Tan; Bob Erens; Michael Wright; Nicholas Mays
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The use of specialty training to retain doctors in Malawi: A discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Kate L Mandeville; Godwin Ulaya; Mylène Lagarde; Adamson S Muula; Titha Dzowela; Kara Hanson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 5.  Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments.

Authors:  Kim-Sarah Kleij; Ulla Tangermann; Volker E Amelung; Christian Krauth
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  A discrete choice experiment to assess people living with HIV's (PLWHIV's) preferences for GP or HIV clinic appointments.

Authors:  A H Miners; C D Llewellyn; V L Cooper; E Youssef; A J Pollard; M Lagarde; C Sabin; E Nixon; M Sachikonye; N Perry; M Fisher
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.519

7.  Preferences heterogeneity of health care utilization of community residents in China: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Ming-Zhu Jiang; Qiang Fu; Ju-Yang Xiong; Xiang-Lin Li; Er-Ping Jia; Ying-Ying Peng; Xiao Shen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Public preferences for primary care provision in Germany - a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Kim-Sarah Krinke; Ulla Tangermann; Volker Eric Amelung; Christian Krauth
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Weekend opening in primary care: analysis of the General Practice Patient Survey.

Authors:  John A Ford; Andy P Jones; Geoff Wong; Nick Steel
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Identifying New Zealand Public Preferences for Pharmacist Prescribers in Primary Care: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Rakhee Raghunandan; Kirsten Howard; Carlo A Marra; June Tordoff; Alesha Smith
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.