C Morosi1, S Stacchiotti2, A Marchianò1, A Bianchi3, S Radaelli3, R Sanfilippo2, C Colombo3, C Richardson3, P Collini4, M Barisella4, P G Casali2, A Gronchi3, M Fiore5. 1. Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. 2. Department of Cancer Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. 3. Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. 4. Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. 5. Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: marco.fiore@istitutotumori.mi.it.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Aim of study was to assess the correlation between computed tomography scan (CT) findings and histopathology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected on consecutive patients with suspected retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) referred to a tertiary sarcoma center. Patients underwent contrast enhanced multi-detector CT scans. Radiological features of lesions were classified according to the presence of a fatty (Group A) mass, or non-fatty (Group B) mass, both subdivided according to homogeneity and intralesional high-contrasted appearance. Radiological classification was compared with histopathological diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 291 patients, 103/291 (35.4%) masses were classified in Group A and 188/291 (64.6%) in Group B. Diagnosis of mesenchymal tumor was obtained in 231/291 cases (79%) and non-mesenchymal tumor in 60/291 (21%). Sensitivity and specificity of Group A for liposarcoma were 76.7% and 92.0%; PPV and NPV were 86.4% and 85.6%. Sensitivity of Group B for a mesenchymal tumor was 55.4% and specificity was 0%; PPV and NPV were 68.1% and 0%. CONCLUSIONS: None of radiological criteria were sufficient to anticipate a specific diagnosis, with the only exception of well differentiated liposarcoma and angiomyolipoma. In a series of suspected RPS, 21% of the lesions were finally non-mesenchymal tumors.
OBJECTIVES: Aim of study was to assess the correlation between computed tomography scan (CT) findings and histopathology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected on consecutive patients with suspected retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) referred to a tertiary sarcoma center. Patients underwent contrast enhanced multi-detector CT scans. Radiological features of lesions were classified according to the presence of a fatty (Group A) mass, or non-fatty (Group B) mass, both subdivided according to homogeneity and intralesional high-contrasted appearance. Radiological classification was compared with histopathological diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 291 patients, 103/291 (35.4%) masses were classified in Group A and 188/291 (64.6%) in Group B. Diagnosis of mesenchymal tumor was obtained in 231/291 cases (79%) and non-mesenchymal tumor in 60/291 (21%). Sensitivity and specificity of Group A for liposarcoma were 76.7% and 92.0%; PPV and NPV were 86.4% and 85.6%. Sensitivity of Group B for a mesenchymal tumor was 55.4% and specificity was 0%; PPV and NPV were 68.1% and 0%. CONCLUSIONS: None of radiological criteria were sufficient to anticipate a specific diagnosis, with the only exception of well differentiated liposarcoma and angiomyolipoma. In a series of suspected RPS, 21% of the lesions were finally non-mesenchymal tumors.
Authors: Amani Arthur; Edward W Johnston; Jessica M Winfield; Matthew D Blackledge; Robin L Jones; Paul H Huang; Christina Messiou Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Cara Lai; Jeremiah R Long; Brandon T Larsen; Jose M Iturregui; Benjamin K Wilke; Krista A Goulding Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2022-10-18 Impact factor: 2.128
Authors: Patrick B Schwartz; George Poultsides; Kevin Roggin; John H Howard; Ryan C Fields; Callisia N Clarke; Konstantinos Votanopoulos; Kenneth Cardona; Emily R Winslow Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 2.192