Ting Xia1, Monika Nitschke2, Ying Zhang3, Pushan Shah4, Shona Crabb1, Alana Hansen1. 1. School of Population Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. 2. The Department for Health and Ageing, South Australia, Australia. 3. School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: ying.zhang@sydney.edu.au. 4. Environment Protection Authority, South Australia, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Motor vehicle emissions contribute nearly a quarter of the world's energy-related greenhouse gases and cause non-negligible air pollution, primarily in urban areas. Changing people's travel behaviour towards alternative transport is an efficient approach to mitigate harmful environmental impacts caused by a large number of vehicles. Such a strategy also provides an opportunity to gain health co-benefits of improved air quality and enhanced physical activities. This study aimed at quantifying co-benefit effects of alternative transport use in Adelaide, South Australia. METHOD: We made projections for a business-as-usual scenario for 2030 with alternative transport scenarios. Separate models including air pollution models and comparative risk assessment health models were developed to link alternative transport scenarios with possible environmental and health benefits. RESULTS: In the study region with an estimated population of 1.4 million in 2030, by shifting 40% of vehicle kilometres travelled (VKT) by passenger vehicles to alternative transport, annual average urban PM2.5 would decline by approximately 0.4μg/m(3) compared to business-as-usual, resulting in net health benefits of an estimated 13deaths/year prevented and 118 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) prevented per year due to improved air quality. Further health benefits would be obtained from improved physical fitness through active transport (508deaths/year prevented, 6569DALYs/year prevented), and changes in traffic injuries (21 deaths and, 960 DALYs prevented). CONCLUSION: Although uncertainties remain, our findings suggest that significant environmental and health benefits are possible if alternative transport replaces even a relatively small portion of car trips. The results may provide assistance to various government organisations and relevant service providers and promote collaboration in policy-making, city planning and infrastructure establishment.
BACKGROUND: Motor vehicle emissions contribute nearly a quarter of the world's energy-related greenhouse gases and cause non-negligible air pollution, primarily in urban areas. Changing people's travel behaviour towards alternative transport is an efficient approach to mitigate harmful environmental impacts caused by a large number of vehicles. Such a strategy also provides an opportunity to gain health co-benefits of improved air quality and enhanced physical activities. This study aimed at quantifying co-benefit effects of alternative transport use in Adelaide, South Australia. METHOD: We made projections for a business-as-usual scenario for 2030 with alternative transport scenarios. Separate models including air pollution models and comparative risk assessment health models were developed to link alternative transport scenarios with possible environmental and health benefits. RESULTS: In the study region with an estimated population of 1.4 million in 2030, by shifting 40% of vehicle kilometres travelled (VKT) by passenger vehicles to alternative transport, annual average urban PM2.5 would decline by approximately 0.4μg/m(3) compared to business-as-usual, resulting in net health benefits of an estimated 13deaths/year prevented and 118 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) prevented per year due to improved air quality. Further health benefits would be obtained from improved physical fitness through active transport (508deaths/year prevented, 6569DALYs/year prevented), and changes in traffic injuries (21 deaths and, 960 DALYs prevented). CONCLUSION: Although uncertainties remain, our findings suggest that significant environmental and health benefits are possible if alternative transport replaces even a relatively small portion of car trips. The results may provide assistance to various government organisations and relevant service providers and promote collaboration in policy-making, city planning and infrastructure establishment.
Authors: Jinghong Gao; Guozhang Xu; Wenjun Ma; Yong Zhang; Alistair Woodward; Sotiris Vardoulakis; Sari Kovats; Paul Wilkinson; Tianfeng He; Hualiang Lin; Tao Liu; Shaohua Gu; Jun Wang; Jing Li; Jun Yang; Xiaobo Liu; Jing Li; Haixia Wu; Qiyong Liu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Rachel K Sullivan; Samantha Marsh; Jakob Halvarsson; Michelle Holdsworth; Wilma Waterlander; Maartje P Poelman; Jennifer Ann Salmond; Hayley Christian; Lenny Sc Koh; Janet E Cade; John C Spence; Alistair Woodward; Ralph Maddison Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Belen Zapata-Diomedi; Luke D Knibbs; Robert S Ware; Kristiann C Heesch; Marko Tainio; James Woodcock; J Lennert Veerman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-10-11 Impact factor: 3.240