Masayoshi Iwamoto1, Kenji Kawada2, Yuji Nakamoto3, Yoshiro Itatani1, Susumu Inamoto1, Kosuke Toda1, Hiroyuki Kimura4, Takehiko Sasazuki5, Senji Shirasawa6, Hiroaki Okuyama7, Masahiro Inoue7, Suguru Hasegawa1, Kaori Togashi3, Yoshiharu Sakai1. 1. Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 2. Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan kkawada@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp. 3. Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 4. Division of Molecular Imaging, Radioisotope Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. 5. Institute for Advanced Study, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan. 6. Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan; and. 7. Department of Biochemistry, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: KRAS gene mutations occur in approximately 40% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) and are associated with resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapy. We previously demonstrated that (18)F-FDG accumulation in PET was significantly higher in CRCs with mutated KRAS than in those with wild-type KRAS in a clinical setting. Here, we investigated the mechanisms by which mutated KRAS increased (18)F-FDG accumulation. METHODS: Using paired isogenic human CRC cell lines that differ only in the mutational status of the KRAS gene, we measured (18)F-FDG accumulation in these cells in vitro and in vivo. We also investigated the roles of proteins that have a function in (18)F-FDG accumulation. Finally, we examined the relationship among mutated KRAS, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), and maximum standardized uptake value with 51 clinical CRC samples. RESULTS: In the in vitro experiments, (18)F-FDG accumulation was significantly higher in KRAS-mutant cells than in wild-type controls under normoxic conditions. The expression levels of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) and hexokinase type 2 (HK2) were higher in KRAS-mutant cells, and (18)F-FDG accumulation was decreased by knockdown of GLUT1. Hypoxic induction of HIF-1α was higher in KRAS-mutant cells than in wild-type controls; in turn, elevated HIF-1α resulted in higher GLUT1 expression and (18)F-FDG accumulation. In addition, HIF-1α knockdown decreased (18)F-FDG accumulation under hypoxic conditions only in the KRAS-mutant cells. Small-animal PET scans showed in vivo (18)F-FDG accumulation to be significantly higher in xenografts with mutated KRAS than in those with wild-type KRAS. The immunohistochemistry of these xenograft tumors showed that staining of GLUT1 was consistent with that of HIF-1α and pimonidazole. In a retrospective analysis of clinical samples, KRAS mutation exhibited a significantly positive correlation with expressions of GLUT1 and HIF-1α and with maximum standardized uptake value. CONCLUSION: Mutated KRAS caused higher (18)F-FDG accumulation possibly by upregulation of GLUT1; moreover, HIF-1α additively increased (18)F-FDG accumulation in hypoxic lesions. (18)F-FDG PET might be useful for predicting the KRAS status noninvasively.
UNLABELLED: KRAS gene mutations occur in approximately 40% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) and are associated with resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapy. We previously demonstrated that (18)F-FDG accumulation in PET was significantly higher in CRCs with mutated KRAS than in those with wild-type KRAS in a clinical setting. Here, we investigated the mechanisms by which mutated KRAS increased (18)F-FDG accumulation. METHODS: Using paired isogenic human CRC cell lines that differ only in the mutational status of the KRAS gene, we measured (18)F-FDG accumulation in these cells in vitro and in vivo. We also investigated the roles of proteins that have a function in (18)F-FDG accumulation. Finally, we examined the relationship among mutated KRAS, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), and maximum standardized uptake value with 51 clinical CRC samples. RESULTS: In the in vitro experiments, (18)F-FDG accumulation was significantly higher in KRAS-mutant cells than in wild-type controls under normoxic conditions. The expression levels of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) and hexokinase type 2 (HK2) were higher in KRAS-mutant cells, and (18)F-FDG accumulation was decreased by knockdown of GLUT1. Hypoxic induction of HIF-1α was higher in KRAS-mutant cells than in wild-type controls; in turn, elevated HIF-1α resulted in higher GLUT1 expression and (18)F-FDG accumulation. In addition, HIF-1α knockdown decreased (18)F-FDG accumulation under hypoxic conditions only in the KRAS-mutant cells. Small-animal PET scans showed in vivo (18)F-FDG accumulation to be significantly higher in xenografts with mutated KRAS than in those with wild-type KRAS. The immunohistochemistry of these xenograft tumors showed that staining of GLUT1 was consistent with that of HIF-1α and pimonidazole. In a retrospective analysis of clinical samples, KRAS mutation exhibited a significantly positive correlation with expressions of GLUT1 and HIF-1α and with maximum standardized uptake value. CONCLUSION: Mutated KRAS caused higher (18)F-FDG accumulation possibly by upregulation of GLUT1; moreover, HIF-1α additively increased (18)F-FDG accumulation in hypoxic lesions. (18)F-FDG PET might be useful for predicting the KRAS status noninvasively.
Authors: Nicholas R Perkons; Omar Johnson; Gabrielle Pilla; Enri Profka; Michael Mercadante; Daniel Ackerman; Terence P F Gade Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-06-04 Impact factor: 12.531