François Rouzet1, Renata Chequer2, Khadija Benali1, Laurent Lepage3, Walid Ghodbane3, Xavier Duval4, Bernard Iung5, Alec Vahanian5, Dominique Le Guludec1, Fabien Hyafil6. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Bichat University Hospital, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire FIRE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University Paris Diderot-Paris 7, Paris, France Inserm Unité Mixte de Recherche 1148, Bichat University Hospital, Paris, France. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Bichat University Hospital, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire FIRE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University Paris Diderot-Paris 7, Paris, France. 3. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Bichat University Hospital, Paris, France. 4. Inserm Clinical Investigation Center 007, Bichat University Hospital, Paris, France; and. 5. Inserm Unité Mixte de Recherche 1148, Bichat University Hospital, Paris, France Department of Cardiac Surgery, Bichat University Hospital, Paris, France Inserm Clinical Investigation Center 007, Bichat University Hospital, Paris, France; and Department of Cardiology, Bichat University Hospital, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire FIRE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University Paris Diderot-Paris 7, Paris, France. 6. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Bichat University Hospital, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire FIRE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University Paris Diderot-Paris 7, Paris, France Inserm Unité Mixte de Recherche 1148, Bichat University Hospital, Paris, France fabien.hyafil@bch.aphp.fr.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Echocardiography plays a key role in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) but can be inconclusive in patients in whom prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is suspected. The incremental diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET and radiolabeled leukocyte scintigraphy in IE patients has already been reported. The aim of this study was to compare the respective performance of (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy for the diagnosis of PVE in 39 patients. METHODS: (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy were performed on 39 consecutive patients admitted because of clinically suspected PVE and inconclusive echocardiography results. The results of (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy were analyzed separately and retrospectively by experienced physicians masked to the results of the other imaging technique and to patient outcome. The final Duke-Li IE classification was made after a 3-mo follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 39 patients, 14 were classified as having definite IE, 4 as having possible IE, and 21 as not having IE. The average interval between (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy was 7 ± 7 d. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 93%, 71%, 68%, 94%, and 80%, respectively, for (18)F-FDG PET and 64%, 100%, 100%, 81%, and 86%, respectively, for leukocyte scintigraphy. Discrepancies between the results of (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy occurred in 12 patients (31%). In patients with definite IE, 5 had true-positive (18)F-FDG PET results but false-negative leukocyte scintigraphy results. Of these 5 patients, 3 had nonpyogenic microorganism IE (Coxiella or Candida). Of patients for whom endocarditis had been excluded, 6 had true-negative leukocyte scintigraphy results but false-positive (18)F-FDG PET results. These 6 patients had been imaged in the first 2 mo after the last cardiac surgery. The last patient with a discrepancy between (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy was classified as having possible endocarditis and had positive (18)F-FDG PET results and negative leukocyte scintigraphy results. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET offers high sensitivity for the detection of active infection in patients with suspected PVE and inconclusive echocardiography results. Leukocyte scintigraphy offers a higher specificity, however, than (18)F-FDG PET for diagnosis of IE and should be considered in cases of inconclusive (18)F-FDG PET findings or in the first 2 mo after cardiac surgery.
UNLABELLED: Echocardiography plays a key role in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) but can be inconclusive in patients in whom prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is suspected. The incremental diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET and radiolabeled leukocyte scintigraphy in IE patients has already been reported. The aim of this study was to compare the respective performance of (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy for the diagnosis of PVE in 39 patients. METHODS: (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy were performed on 39 consecutive patients admitted because of clinically suspected PVE and inconclusive echocardiography results. The results of (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy were analyzed separately and retrospectively by experienced physicians masked to the results of the other imaging technique and to patient outcome. The final Duke-Li IE classification was made after a 3-mo follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 39 patients, 14 were classified as having definite IE, 4 as having possible IE, and 21 as not having IE. The average interval between (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy was 7 ± 7 d. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 93%, 71%, 68%, 94%, and 80%, respectively, for (18)F-FDG PET and 64%, 100%, 100%, 81%, and 86%, respectively, for leukocyte scintigraphy. Discrepancies between the results of (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy occurred in 12 patients (31%). In patients with definite IE, 5 had true-positive (18)F-FDG PET results but false-negative leukocyte scintigraphy results. Of these 5 patients, 3 had nonpyogenic microorganism IE (Coxiella or Candida). Of patients for whom endocarditis had been excluded, 6 had true-negative leukocyte scintigraphy results but false-positive (18)F-FDG PET results. These 6 patients had been imaged in the first 2 mo after the last cardiac surgery. The last patient with a discrepancy between (18)F-FDG PET and leukocyte scintigraphy was classified as having possible endocarditis and had positive (18)F-FDG PET results and negative leukocyte scintigraphy results. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET offers high sensitivity for the detection of active infection in patients with suspected PVE and inconclusive echocardiography results. Leukocyte scintigraphy offers a higher specificity, however, than (18)F-FDG PET for diagnosis of IE and should be considered in cases of inconclusive (18)F-FDG PET findings or in the first 2 mo after cardiac surgery.
Authors: Paola Anna Erba; Patrizio Lancellotti; Isidre Vilacosta; Oliver Gaemperli; Francois Rouzet; Marcus Hacker; Alberto Signore; Riemer H J A Slart; Gilbert Habib Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 9.236