Joseph A Roscoe1, Sheila N Garland2, Charles E Heckler2, Michael L Perlis2, Anita R Peoples2, Michelle Shayne2, Josée Savard2, Nina P Daniels2, Gary R Morrow2. 1. Joseph A. Roscoe, Charles E. Heckler, Anita R. Peoples, Michelle Shayne, Nina P. Daniels, and Gary R. Morrow, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Sheila N. Garland and Michael L. Perlis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Josée Savard, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. joseph_roscoe@urmc.rochester.edu. 2. Joseph A. Roscoe, Charles E. Heckler, Anita R. Peoples, Michelle Shayne, Nina P. Daniels, and Gary R. Morrow, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Sheila N. Garland and Michael L. Perlis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Josée Savard, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE:Insomnia is a distressing and often persisting consequence of cancer. Although cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the treatment of choice in the general population, the use of CBT-I in patients with cancer is complicated, because it can result in transient but substantial increases in daytime sleepiness. In this study, we evaluated whether CBT-I, in combination with the wakefulness-promoting agent armodafinil (A), results in better insomnia treatment outcomes in cancer survivors than CBT-I alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report on a randomized trial of 96 cancer survivors (mean age, 56 years; female, 87.5%; breast cancer, 68%). The primary analyses examined whether ≥ one of the 7-week intervention conditions (ie, CBT-I, A, or both), when compared with a placebo capsule (P) group, produced significantly greater clinical gains. Insomnia was assessed by the Insomnia Severity Index and sleep quality by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory. All patients received sleep hygiene instructions. RESULTS: Analyses controlling for baseline differences showed that both the CBT-I plus A (P = .001) and CBT-I plus P (P = .010) groups had significantly greater reductions in insomnia severity postintervention than the P group, with effect sizes of 1.31 and 1.02, respectively. Similar improvements were seen for sleep quality. Gains on both measures persisted 3 months later. CBT-I plus A was not significantly different from CBT-I plus P (P = .421), and A alone was not significantly different from P alone (P = .584). CONCLUSION:CBT-I results in significant and durable improvements in insomnia and sleep quality. A did not significantly improve the efficacy of CBT-I or independently affect insomnia or sleep quality.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Insomnia is a distressing and often persisting consequence of cancer. Although cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the treatment of choice in the general population, the use of CBT-I in patients with cancer is complicated, because it can result in transient but substantial increases in daytime sleepiness. In this study, we evaluated whether CBT-I, in combination with the wakefulness-promoting agent armodafinil (A), results in better insomnia treatment outcomes in cancer survivors than CBT-I alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report on a randomized trial of 96 cancer survivors (mean age, 56 years; female, 87.5%; breast cancer, 68%). The primary analyses examined whether ≥ one of the 7-week intervention conditions (ie, CBT-I, A, or both), when compared with a placebo capsule (P) group, produced significantly greater clinical gains. Insomnia was assessed by the Insomnia Severity Index and sleep quality by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory. All patients received sleep hygiene instructions. RESULTS: Analyses controlling for baseline differences showed that both the CBT-I plus A (P = .001) and CBT-I plus P (P = .010) groups had significantly greater reductions in insomnia severity postintervention than the P group, with effect sizes of 1.31 and 1.02, respectively. Similar improvements were seen for sleep quality. Gains on both measures persisted 3 months later. CBT-I plus A was not significantly different from CBT-I plus P (P = .421), and A alone was not significantly different from P alone (P = .584). CONCLUSION:CBT-I results in significant and durable improvements in insomnia and sleep quality. A did not significantly improve the efficacy of CBT-I or independently affect insomnia or sleep quality.
Authors: Sheila N Garland; Linda E Carlson; Alisa J Stephens; Michael C Antle; Charles Samuels; Tavis S Campbell Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-01-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ellyn E Matthews; J Todd Arnedt; Michaela S McCarthy; Leisha J Cuddihy; Mark S Aloia Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 11.609
Authors: Colin A Espie; Leanne Fleming; James Cassidy; Leslie Samuel; Lynne M Taylor; Craig A White; Neil J Douglas; Heather M Engleman; Heidi-Louise Kelly; James Paul Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lavinia Fiorentino; John R McQuaid; Lianqi Liu; Loki Natarajan; Feng He; Monique Cornejo; Susan Lawton; Barbara A Parker; Georgia R Sadler; Sonia Ancoli-Israel Journal: Nat Sci Sleep Date: 2010-12-16
Authors: Anita R Peoples; Sheila N Garland; Wilfred R Pigeon; Michael L Perlis; Julie Rya Wolf; Kathi L Heffner; Karen M Mustian; Charles E Heckler; Luke J Peppone; Charles S Kamen; Gary R Morrow; Joseph A Roscoe Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Anita R Peoples; Sheila N Garland; Michael L Perlis; Josée Savard; Charles E Heckler; Charles S Kamen; Julie L Ryan; Karen M Mustian; Michelle C Janelsins; Luke J Peppone; Gary R Morrow; Joseph A Roscoe Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Charles Kamen; Sheila N Garland; Charles E Heckler; Anita R Peoples; Ian R Kleckner; Calvin L Cole; Michael L Perlis; Gary R Morrow; Karen M Mustian; Joseph A Roscoe Journal: Behav Sleep Med Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 2.964
Authors: Heather S L Jim; Aasha I Hoogland; Hyo Sook Han; Eva Culakova; Charles Heckler; Michelle Janelsins; Geoffrey C Williams; Julienne Bower; Stephen Cole; Zeruesenay Desta; Margarita Bobonis Babilonia; Gary Morrow; Luke Peppone Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Terri S Armstrong; Marcia Y Shade; Ghislain Breton; Mark R Gilbert; Anita Mahajan; Michael E Scheurer; Elizabeth Vera; Ann M Berger Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Sheila N Garland; Joseph A Roscoe; Charles E Heckler; Holly Barilla; Philip Gehrman; James C Findley; Anita R Peoples; Gary R Morrow; Charles Kamen; Michael L Perlis Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2015-12-31 Impact factor: 3.492