Literature DB >> 25452368

Re-admissions, re-operations and length of stay in hospital after aseptic revision knee replacement in Denmark: a two-year nationwide study.

M Lindberg-Larsen1, C C Jørgensen1, T Bæk Hansen2, S Solgaard3, A Odgaard3, H Kehlet1.   

Abstract

We present detailed information about early morbidity after aseptic revision knee replacement from a nationwide study. All aseptic revision knee replacements undertaken between 1st October 2009 and 30th September 2011 were analysed using the Danish National Patient Registry with additional information from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. The 1218 revisions involving 1165 patients were subdivided into total revisions, large partial revisions, partial revisions and revisions of unicondylar replacements (UKR revisions). The mean age was 65.0 years (27 to 94) and the median length of hospital stay was four days (interquartile range: 3 to 5), with a 90 days re-admission rate of 9.9%, re-operation rate of 3.5% and mortality rate of 0.2%. The age ranges of 51 to 55 years (p = 0.018), 76 to 80 years (p < 0.001) and ≥ 81 years (p < 0.001) were related to an increased risk of re-admission. The age ranges of 76 to 80 years (p = 0.018) and the large partial revision subgroup (p = 0.073) were related to an increased risk of re-operation. The ages from 76 to 80 years (p < 0.001), age ≥ 81 years (p < 0.001) and surgical time > 120 min (p < 0.001) were related to increased length of hospital stay, whereas the use of a tourniquet (p = 0.008) and surgery in a low volume centre (p = 0.013) were related to shorter length of stay. In conclusion, we found a similar incidence of early post-operative morbidity after aseptic knee revisions as has been reported after primary procedures. This suggests that a length of hospital stay ≤ four days and discharge home at that time is safe following aseptic knee revision surgery in Denmark. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fast-track; Morbidity; Mortality; Nationwide.; Readmissions; Reoperations; Revision; Total knee arthroplasty; Total knee replacement; Unicondylar knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25452368     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B12.33621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  4 in total

1.  Enhanced recovery principles applied to revision hip and knee arthroplasty reduces length of stay and blood transfusion.

Authors:  Michael Kent; Nick Calvert; Kevin Blades; Alex Swann; Piers Yates
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-08-12

2.  Patients Who Undergo Early Aseptic Revision TKA Within 90 Days of Surgery Have a High Risk of Re-revision and Infection at 2 Years: A Large-database Study.

Authors:  Tony S Shen; Alex Gu; Patawut Bovonratwet; Nathaniel T Ondeck; Peter K Sculco; Edwin P Su
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Revision of infected knee arthroplasties in Denmark.

Authors:  Martin Lindberg-Larsen; Christoffer C Jørgensen; Jens Bagger; Henrik M Schrøder; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Patient safety in distal femoral resection knee arthroplasty for non-tumor indications: a single-center consecutive cohort study of 45 patients.

Authors:  Yasemin Corap; Michael Brix; Claus Emmeluth; Martin Lindberg-Larsen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.