Paul M Scholten1, Shounuck I Patel2, Paul J Christos3, Jaspal R Singh4. 1. Weill Cornell Medical Center, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Baker Pavilion, 16th Floor, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10065(∗). Electronic address: paul.scholten@gmail.com. 2. Rutgers University-New Jersey Medical School/Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, Newark, NJ(†). 3. Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY(‡). 4. Weill Cornell Medical Center, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Baker Pavilion, 16th Floor, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10065(§).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between sacroiliac joint (SIJ) contrast dispersal patterns during SIJ corticosteroid injection and pain relief at 2 and 8 weeks after the procedure. The association between the number of positive provocative SIJ physical examination maneuvers (minimum of one in all patients undergoing SIJ injection) and the patient's response to the intervention was also assessed. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Academic outpatient musculoskeletal practice. PATIENTS: Fifty-four subjects who underwent therapeutic SIJ corticosteroid injection were screened for inclusion; 49 subjects were included in the final analysis. METHODS: A retrospective review of electronic medical records identified patients who underwent SIJ corticosteroid injection. Fluoroscopic contrast flow patterns were categorized as type I (intra-articular injection with cephalad extension within the SIJ) or type II (intra-articular injection with poor cephalad extension). Self-reported numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) values at the time of injection and 2 and 8 weeks after the procedure were recorded. The number of positive provocative SIJ physical examination maneuvers at the time of the initial evaluation was also recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the effect of contrast patterns (type I or type II) on change in NPRS values at 2 weeks and 8 weeks after the injection. The secondary outcome measure was the association between the number of positive provocative SIJ physical examination maneuvers and decrease in the level of pain after the procedure. RESULTS: At 2 weeks after the procedure, type I subjects demonstrated a significantly lower mean NPRS value compared with type II subjects (2.8 ± 1.4 versus 3.8 ± 1.6, respectively, P = .02). No statistically significant difference was observed at 8 weeks after the procedure. NPRS values were significantly reduced both at 2 weeks and 8 weeks, compared with baseline, in both subjects identified as having type I flow and those with type II flow (P < .0001 for all within-group comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopically guided corticosteroid injections into the SIJ joint are effective in decreasing NPRS values in patients with SIJ-mediated pain. Delivery of corticosteroid to the superior portion of the SIJ leads to a greater reduction in pain at 2 weeks, but not at 8 weeks. Patients with at least one positive provocative maneuver should benefit from an intra-articular corticosteroid injection.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between sacroiliac joint (SIJ) contrast dispersal patterns during SIJ corticosteroid injection and pain relief at 2 and 8 weeks after the procedure. The association between the number of positive provocative SIJ physical examination maneuvers (minimum of one in all patients undergoing SIJ injection) and the patient's response to the intervention was also assessed. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Academic outpatient musculoskeletal practice. PATIENTS: Fifty-four subjects who underwent therapeutic SIJ corticosteroid injection were screened for inclusion; 49 subjects were included in the final analysis. METHODS: A retrospective review of electronic medical records identified patients who underwent SIJ corticosteroid injection. Fluoroscopic contrast flow patterns were categorized as type I (intra-articular injection with cephalad extension within the SIJ) or type II (intra-articular injection with poor cephalad extension). Self-reported numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) values at the time of injection and 2 and 8 weeks after the procedure were recorded. The number of positive provocative SIJ physical examination maneuvers at the time of the initial evaluation was also recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the effect of contrast patterns (type I or type II) on change in NPRS values at 2 weeks and 8 weeks after the injection. The secondary outcome measure was the association between the number of positive provocative SIJ physical examination maneuvers and decrease in the level of pain after the procedure. RESULTS: At 2 weeks after the procedure, type I subjects demonstrated a significantly lower mean NPRS value compared with type II subjects (2.8 ± 1.4 versus 3.8 ± 1.6, respectively, P = .02). No statistically significant difference was observed at 8 weeks after the procedure. NPRS values were significantly reduced both at 2 weeks and 8 weeks, compared with baseline, in both subjects identified as having type I flow and those with type II flow (P < .0001 for all within-group comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopically guided corticosteroid injections into the SIJ joint are effective in decreasing NPRS values in patients with SIJ-mediated pain. Delivery of corticosteroid to the superior portion of the SIJ leads to a greater reduction in pain at 2 weeks, but not at 8 weeks. Patients with at least one positive provocative maneuver should benefit from an intra-articular corticosteroid injection.
Authors: R K Luukkainen; P V Wennerstrand; H H Kautiainen; M T Sanila; E L Asikainen Journal: Clin Exp Rheumatol Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.473
Authors: Karolina M Szadek; Peter van der Wurff; Maurits W van Tulder; Wouter W Zuurmond; Roberto S G M Perez Journal: J Pain Date: 2008-12-19 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Sem M M Hermans; Jorm M Nellensteijn; Henk van Santbrink; Rob Knoef; Mattheus K Reinders; Daisy M N Hoofwijk; Jan W Potters; Kris L L Movig; Inez Curfs; Wouter L W van Hemert Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 2.692