James Steele1, Stewart Bruce-Low2, Dave Smith3, David Jessop2, Neil Osborne4. 1. Centre for Health, Exercise and Sport Science, Southampton Solent University, UK. Electronic address: james.steele@solent.ac.uk. 2. Centre for Health, Exercise and Sport Science, Southampton Solent University, UK. 3. Department of Exercise & Sport Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK. 4. AECC Clinic, Anglo European College of Chiropractic, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain is a multifactorial condition with many dysfunctions including gait variability. The lumbar spine and its musculature are involved during gait and in chronic low back pain the lumbar extensors are often deconditioned. It was therefore of interest to examine relationships between lumbar kinematic variability during gait, with pain, disability and isolated lumbar extension strength in participants with chronic low back pain. METHODS: Twenty four participants with chronic low back pain were assessed for lumbar kinematics during gait, isolated lumbar extension strength, pain, and disability. Angular displacement and kinematic waveform pattern and offset variability were examined. FINDINGS: Angular displacement and kinematic waveform pattern and offset variability differed across movement planes; displacement was highest and similar in frontal and transverse planes, and pattern variability and offset variability higher in the sagittal plane compared to frontal and transverse planes which were similar. Spearman's correlations showed significant correlations between transverse plane pattern variability and isolated lumbar extension strength (r=-.411) and disability (r=.401). However, pain was not correlated with pattern variability in any plane. The r(2) values suggested 80.5% to 86.3% of variance was accounted for by other variables. INTERPRETATION: Considering the lumbar extensors role in gait, the relationship between both isolated lumbar extension strength and disability with transverse plane pattern variability suggests that gait variability may result in consequence of lumbar extensor deconditioning or disability accompanying chronic low back pain. However, further study should examine the temporality of these relationships and other variables might account for the unexplained variance.
BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain is a multifactorial condition with many dysfunctions including gait variability. The lumbar spine and its musculature are involved during gait and in chronic low back pain the lumbar extensors are often deconditioned. It was therefore of interest to examine relationships between lumbar kinematic variability during gait, with pain, disability and isolated lumbar extension strength in participants with chronic low back pain. METHODS: Twenty four participants with chronic low back pain were assessed for lumbar kinematics during gait, isolated lumbar extension strength, pain, and disability. Angular displacement and kinematic waveform pattern and offset variability were examined. FINDINGS: Angular displacement and kinematic waveform pattern and offset variability differed across movement planes; displacement was highest and similar in frontal and transverse planes, and pattern variability and offset variability higher in the sagittal plane compared to frontal and transverse planes which were similar. Spearman's correlations showed significant correlations between transverse plane pattern variability and isolated lumbar extension strength (r=-.411) and disability (r=.401). However, pain was not correlated with pattern variability in any plane. The r(2) values suggested 80.5% to 86.3% of variance was accounted for by other variables. INTERPRETATION: Considering the lumbar extensors role in gait, the relationship between both isolated lumbar extension strength and disability with transverse plane pattern variability suggests that gait variability may result in consequence of lumbar extensor deconditioning or disability accompanying chronic low back pain. However, further study should examine the temporality of these relationships and other variables might account for the unexplained variance.
Authors: Chandrasekaran Jayaraman; Shenan Hoppe-Ludwig; Susan Deems-Dluhy; Matt McGuire; Chaithanya Mummidisetty; Rachel Siegal; Aileen Naef; Brian E Lawson; Michael Goldfarb; Keith E Gordon; Arun Jayaraman Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Rasool Bagheri; Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani; Mehdi Dadgoo; Amir Ahmadi; Javad Sarrafzadeh; Mohammad Reza Pourahmadi; Amir-Salar Jafarpisheh Journal: Ann Rehabil Med Date: 2018-04-30
Authors: Whoan Jeang Kim; Kap Jung Kim; Dae Geon Song; Jong Shin Lee; Kun Young Park; Jae Won Lee; Shann Haw Chang; Won Sik Choy Journal: Asian Spine J Date: 2020-01-08