Literature DB >> 25451631

Short- and long-term results of harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy versus stapler hemorrhoidopexy in treatment of hemorrhoidal disease.

Yusuf Bilgin1, Semih Hot2, İlhami Soykan Barlas1, Arzu Akan1, Yavuz Eryavuz1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this prospective randomized study, our aim is to compare the short- and long-term results of harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy (HSH) and stapler hemorrhoidopexy (SH) methods in the surgical treatment of Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoidal disease.
METHODS: Ninety-nine consecutive patients diagnosed with Grade III or Grade IV internal hemorrhoidal disease were included in the study. Patients were randomized to HSH (n = 48) or SH (n = 51) treatments. Data on patient demographic and clinical characteristics, operative details, postoperative pain score on a visual analog scale, additional analgesic requirement, postoperative short- and long-term complications, and recurrence of hemorrhoidal disease were also recorded. Patients were regularly followed for a total period of 24 (6-36) months.
RESULTS: The patient demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in the two groups. The operative time was significantly shorter in the HSH group compared with the SH group. Overall pain scores were not significantly different between the groups, although severe pain was significantly more common in the HSH group. Recurrence was significantly lower in the HSH group compared with the SH group.
CONCLUSION: HSH and SH are both safe and effective methods for surgical treatment of Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoidal disease. In our study, the HSH method was determined to be safer, easier, and faster to perform, and associated with fewer long-term recurrences than the SH method.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Taiwan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  harmonic scalpel; stapled hemorrhoidopexy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25451631     DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2014.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Surg        ISSN: 1015-9584            Impact factor:   2.767


  4 in total

1.  Linear Pinched Hemorrhoidectomy: A Retrospective Observational Study (An Innovative, Simplified Hemorrhoidectomy).

Authors:  Akiharu Kurihara; Yu Yoshino; Yu Sakai; Yasuyuki Miura; Satoru Kagami; Tomoaki Kaneko; Mitsunori Ushigome; Hiroyuki Shiokawa; Hironori Kaneko; Kimihiko Funahashi
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2021-07-29

Review 2.  Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: A PRISMA-compliant updated meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Authors:  Yan Song; Honglei Chen; Fang Yang; Yuheng Zeng; Yongheng He; Huiyong Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Mucocele: a rare complication following stapled haemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Xing-Yang Wan; Yuan-Ji Fu; Gui-Ming Li; Guo-Zhong Xiao; Zhi-Wei Guo; Dong-Lin Ren; Bo Cao; Hong-Cheng Lin
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.030

Review 4.  A systematic review of the literature assessing the outcomes of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus open haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Q Z Ruan; W English; A Hotouras; C Bryant; F Taylor; S Andreani; S D Wexner; S Banerjee
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.781

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.