Literature DB >> 25451486

Minimal access rapid deployment aortic valve replacement: initial single-center experience and 12-month outcomes.

Markus Schlömicher1, Peter Lukas Haldenwang2, Vadim Moustafine2, Matthias Bechtel2, Justus Thomas Strauch2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A single-center observational study was initialized to evaluate the feasibility of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement using the Edwards Intuity valve system (Edwards Lifesciences Corp, Irvine, Calif) in a minimally invasive setting. A total of 60 implantations have been performed at the Ruhr University Hospital Bergmannsheil using a minimal access technique. We present the first short-term and 12-month clinical and hemodynamic results.
METHODS: Aortic valve replacement using a partial sternotomy was performed in all patients. Patients' mean age was 75.5 (±6.2) years. The mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation was 8.4 ± 4.2, and 39% (n = 23) of patients were female. A clinical follow-up for echocardiographic assessment was performed after 12 months.
RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 1.7% (n = 1). The mean postoperative transprosthetic gradient was 11.7 (±4.3) mm Hg. The mean effective orifice area was 1.8 (±0.3) cm(2). One case of higher-grade regurgitation (aortic insufficiency >+1) occurred. The late mortality rate was 5.1% (3/59). After 12 months, the mean transprosthetic gradient was 10.3 (±3.8) mm Hg. The mean effective orifice area of 1.8 (±0.3) cm(2) remained unchanged. The mean implantation time was 9 (±3) minutes. The mean crossclamp time was 26 (±7) minutes. The average bypass time was 56 (±16) minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: Reproducible short crossclamp and bypass times were achieved in a minimally invasive setting. The valve shows good hemodynamic performance comparable to other sutureless or rapid deployment valves. Nevertheless, future follow-up investigation has to be awaited to gain more data concerning durability and safety issues.
Copyright © 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25451486     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.09.118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  6 in total

1.  Direct comparison of rapid deployment versus sutureless aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suk Ho Sohn; Yoonjin Kang; Ji Seong Kim; Jae Woong Choi; Myoung-Jin Jang; Ho Young Hwang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Current Clinical Evidence on Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement: Sutureless Aortic Bioprostheses.

Authors:  Glenn R Barnhart; Malakh Lal Shrestha
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

3.  Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement after Previous Mechanical Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Markus Schlömicher; Peter Lukas Haldenwang; Vadim Moustafine; Britta Wolf; Peter Zahn; Matthias Bechtel; Justus Thomas Strauch
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Rep       Date:  2016-04-04

4.  Initial Experience with Aortic Valve Replacement via a Minimally Invasive Approach: A Comparison of Stented, Stentless and Sutureless Valves.

Authors:  Johanna Konertz; Konstantin Zhigalov; Alexander Weymann; Pascal M Dohmen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-04-05

5.  Rapid deployment valve system shortens operative times for aortic valve replacement through right anterior minithoracotomy.

Authors:  Constanze Bening; Khaled Hamouda; Mehmet Oezkur; Christoph Schimmer; Ina Schade; Armin Gorski; Ivan Aleksic; Rainer Leyh
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Rapid Deployment Aortic Valves Deliver Superior Hemodynamic Performance In Vitro.

Authors:  Lisong Ai; Harvey Chen; Virginia Lin; Vinayak N Bapat
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.