Sonia Malik1, Adrian Wells2, Anja Wittkowski3. 1. University of Manchester, School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom. 2. University of Manchester, School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom. 3. University of Manchester, School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom. Electronic address: anja.wittkowski@manchester.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Attachment theory has been conceptualised as an emotion regulation theory. Research attributes the occurrence of depressive symptoms to a dysfunction of emotion regulation. Anxious attachment and avoidant attachment, which are two dimensions of insecure attachment, are hypothesised to lead to the development of hyperactivating and deactivating emotion regulation strategies. METHODS: This systematic review examines the literature on the role of emotion regulation and its relationship with attachment and depressive symptomatology. Furthermore, we examined evidence for hyperactivating and deactivating strategies. RESULTS: Nineteen papers were identified. Adolescent studies demonstrated associations of varying strength and found unreliable and contradictory results for emotion regulation as a mediator. Conversely, adult studies provided strong evidence for emotion regulation as a mediator. The hypothesis that hyperactivating strategies mediate anxious attachment and depressive symptoms was consistently supported. Mixed evidence was provided for deactivating strategies as mediators to avoidant attachment and depressive symptomatology. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of methodology and quality of studies are identified with particular attention drawn to problems with conceptual singularity and multicollinearity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite mixed variable findings, this review indicates that emotion regulation is a mediator between attachment and depression. Hyperactivating strategies, in particular, have been consistently noted as mediators for anxious attachment and depressive symptomatology, whereas evidence for deactivating strategies as mediators between avoidant attachment and depressive symptoms has been mixed. Future research should test the mediators of attachment and symptoms and examine theoretically grounded models of psychopathology, such as metacognitive and cognitive models using clinical samples.
BACKGROUND: Attachment theory has been conceptualised as an emotion regulation theory. Research attributes the occurrence of depressive symptoms to a dysfunction of emotion regulation. Anxious attachment and avoidant attachment, which are two dimensions of insecure attachment, are hypothesised to lead to the development of hyperactivating and deactivating emotion regulation strategies. METHODS: This systematic review examines the literature on the role of emotion regulation and its relationship with attachment and depressive symptomatology. Furthermore, we examined evidence for hyperactivating and deactivating strategies. RESULTS: Nineteen papers were identified. Adolescent studies demonstrated associations of varying strength and found unreliable and contradictory results for emotion regulation as a mediator. Conversely, adult studies provided strong evidence for emotion regulation as a mediator. The hypothesis that hyperactivating strategies mediate anxious attachment and depressive symptoms was consistently supported. Mixed evidence was provided for deactivating strategies as mediators to avoidant attachment and depressive symptomatology. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of methodology and quality of studies are identified with particular attention drawn to problems with conceptual singularity and multicollinearity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite mixed variable findings, this review indicates that emotion regulation is a mediator between attachment and depression. Hyperactivating strategies, in particular, have been consistently noted as mediators for anxious attachment and depressive symptomatology, whereas evidence for deactivating strategies as mediators between avoidant attachment and depressive symptoms has been mixed. Future research should test the mediators of attachment and symptoms and examine theoretically grounded models of psychopathology, such as metacognitive and cognitive models using clinical samples.
Authors: Ian M Shochet; Beth R Saggers; Suzanne B Carrington; Jayne A Orr; Astrid M Wurfl; Bonnie M Duncan; Coral L Smith Journal: Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev Date: 2016-06
Authors: Martine W F T Verhees; Chloë Finet; Sien Vandesande; Margot Bastin; Patricia Bijttebier; Nadja Bodner; Tanya Van Aswegen; Magali Van de Walle; Guy Bosmans Journal: J Youth Adolesc Date: 2021-04-01
Authors: Michaela Hiebler-Ragger; Johanna Falthansl-Scheinecker; Gerhard Birnhuber; Andreas Fink; Human Friedrich Unterrainer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eva Henje Blom; Tiffany C Ho; Colm G Connolly; Kaja Z LeWinn; Matthew D Sacchet; Olga Tymofiyeva; Helen Y Weng; Tony T Yang Journal: Acta Paediatr Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 2.299