Roger S McIntyre1, Joanna K Soczynska2, Danielle S Cha2, Hanna O Woldeyohannes3, Roman S Dale4, Mohammad T Alsuwaidan3, Laura Ashley Gallaugher3, Rodrigo B Mansur3, David J Muzina5, Andre Carvalho6, Sidney H Kennedy7. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: Roger.McIntyre@uhn.ca. 2. Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3. Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 5. Medco Health Solutions, Inc, Fort Worth, TX, USA. 6. Translational Psychiatry Research Group and Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil. 7. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of individuals with mood disorders present with sub-syndromal hypo/manic features. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the prevalence and illness characteristics of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Version-5 (DSM-5) - defined mixed features specifier (MFS) in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD). METHOD: Data from participants who met criteria for a current mood episode as part of MDD (n=506) or BD (BD-I: n=216, BD-II: n=130) were included in this post-hoc analysis. All participants were enrolled in the International Mood Disorders Collaborative Project (IMDCP): a collaborative research platform at the Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University of Toronto and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. Mixed features specifier was operationalized as a score ≥ 1 on 3 or more select items on the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) or ≥ 1 on 3 select items of the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) during an index major depressive episode (MDE) or hypo/manic episode, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 26.0% (n=149), 34.0% (n=65), and 33.8% (n=49) of individuals met criteria for MFS during an index MDE as part of MDD, BD-I and BD-II, respectively. Mixed features specifier during a hypo/manic episode was identified in 20.4% (n=52) and 5.1% (n=8) in BD-I and BD-II participants, respectively. Individuals with MDE-MFS as part of BD or MDD exhibited a more severe depressive phenotype (p=0.0002 and p<0.0002, respectively) and reported a higher rate of alcohol/substance use disorder in the context of BD but not MDD (p=0.002). Individuals with MFS were more likely to have co-existing heart disease suggestive of a distinct pattern of comorbidity and neurobiology. LIMITATIONS: Data were post-hoc and obtained from individuals utilizing a university-based mood disorder centre which may affect generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Version-5-defined MFS is common during an MDE as part of MDD and BD. The presence of MFS identifies a subgroup of individuals with greater illness complexity and possibly a higher rate of cardiovascular comorbidity. The results herein underscore the common occurrence of MFS in adults with either BD or MDD. Moreover, the results of our analysis indicate that adults with mood disorders and MFS have distinct clinical characteristics and comorbidity patterns.
BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of individuals with mood disorders present with sub-syndromal hypo/manic features. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the prevalence and illness characteristics of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Version-5 (DSM-5) - defined mixed features specifier (MFS) in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD). METHOD: Data from participants who met criteria for a current mood episode as part of MDD (n=506) or BD (BD-I: n=216, BD-II: n=130) were included in this post-hoc analysis. All participants were enrolled in the International Mood Disorders Collaborative Project (IMDCP): a collaborative research platform at the Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University of Toronto and the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. Mixed features specifier was operationalized as a score ≥ 1 on 3 or more select items on the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) or ≥ 1 on 3 select items of the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) during an index major depressive episode (MDE) or hypo/manic episode, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 26.0% (n=149), 34.0% (n=65), and 33.8% (n=49) of individuals met criteria for MFS during an index MDE as part of MDD, BD-I and BD-II, respectively. Mixed features specifier during a hypo/manic episode was identified in 20.4% (n=52) and 5.1% (n=8) in BD-I and BD-II participants, respectively. Individuals with MDE-MFS as part of BD or MDD exhibited a more severe depressive phenotype (p=0.0002 and p<0.0002, respectively) and reported a higher rate of alcohol/substance use disorder in the context of BD but not MDD (p=0.002). Individuals with MFS were more likely to have co-existing heart disease suggestive of a distinct pattern of comorbidity and neurobiology. LIMITATIONS: Data were post-hoc and obtained from individuals utilizing a university-based mood disorder centre which may affect generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Version-5-defined MFS is common during an MDE as part of MDD and BD. The presence of MFS identifies a subgroup of individuals with greater illness complexity and possibly a higher rate of cardiovascular comorbidity. The results herein underscore the common occurrence of MFS in adults with either BD or MDD. Moreover, the results of our analysis indicate that adults with mood disorders and MFS have distinct clinical characteristics and comorbidity patterns.
Authors: Manish K Jha; Ashley L Malchow; Bruce D Grannemann; A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Raymond W Lam; Diane McIntosh; JianLi Wang; Murray W Enns; Theo Kolivakis; Erin E Michalak; Jitender Sareen; Wei-Yi Song; Sidney H Kennedy; Glenda M MacQueen; Roumen V Milev; Sagar V Parikh; Arun V Ravindran Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Roger S McIntyre; Martin Alda; Ross J Baldessarini; Michael Bauer; Michael Berk; Christoph U Correll; Andrea Fagiolini; Kostas Fountoulakis; Mark A Frye; Heinz Grunze; Lars V Kessing; David J Miklowitz; Gordon Parker; Robert M Post; Alan C Swann; Trisha Suppes; Eduard Vieta; Allan Young; Mario Maj Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2022-10 Impact factor: 79.683
Authors: Diego Freitas Tavares; Paulo Suen; Carla Garcia Rodrigues Dos Santos; Doris Hupfeld Moreno; Leandro Da Costa Lane Valiengo; Izio Klein; Lucas Borrione; Pamela Marques Forte; André R Brunoni; Ricardo Alberto Moreno Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Diego Hidalgo-Mazzei; Michael Berk; Andrea Cipriani; Anthony J Cleare; Arianna Di Florio; Daniel Dietch; John R Geddes; Guy M Goodwin; Heinz Grunze; Joseph F Hayes; Ian Jones; Siegfried Kasper; Karine Macritchie; R Hamish McAllister-Williams; Richard Morriss; Sam Nayrouz; Sofia Pappa; Jair C Soares; Daniel J Smith; Trisha Suppes; Peter Talbot; Eduard Vieta; Stuart Watson; Lakshmi N Yatham; Allan H Young; Paul R A Stokes Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 10.671
Authors: Elena C Peterson; Benjamin M Rosenberg; Christina M Hough; Christina F Sandman; Chiara Neilson; David J Miklowitz; Roselinde H Kaiser Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 4.839