Literature DB >> 25451179

Learning from the QUEST multicentre feasibility randomization trials in breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

Z E Winters1, M Emson, C Griffin, J Mills, P Hopwood, N Bidad, L MacDonald, E P L Turton, R Horne, J M Bliss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction aims to improve health-related quality of life after mastectomy. However, evidence guiding patients and surgeons in shared decision-making concerning the optimal type or timing of surgery is lacking.
METHODS: QUEST comprised two parallel feasibility phase III randomized multicentre trials to assess the impact of the type and timing of latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction on health-related quality of life when postmastectomy radiotherapy is unlikely (QUEST A) or highly probable (QUEST B). The primary endpoint for the feasibility phase was the proportion of women who accepted randomization, and it would be considered feasible if patient acceptability rates exceeded 25 per cent of women approached. A companion QUEST Perspectives Study (QPS) of patients (both accepting and declining trial participation) and healthcare professionals assessed trial acceptability.
RESULTS: The QUEST trials opened in 15 UK centres. After 18 months of recruitment, 17 patients were randomized to QUEST A and eight to QUEST B, with overall acceptance rates of 19 per cent (17 of 88) and 22 per cent (8 of 36) respectively. The QPS recruited 56 patients and 51 healthcare professionals. Patient preference was the predominant reason for declining trial entry, given by 47 (53 per cent) of the 88 patients approached for QUEST A and 22 (61 per cent) of the 36 approached for QUEST B. Both trials closed to recruitment in December 2012, acknowledging the challenges of achieving satisfactory patient accrual.
CONCLUSION: Despite extensive efforts to overcome recruitment barriers, it was not feasible to reach timely recruitment targets within a feasibility study. Patient preferences for breast reconstruction types and timings were common, rendering patients unwilling to enter the trial.
© 2014 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25451179     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  8 in total

1.  How informed is declared altruism in clinical trials? A qualitative interview study of patient decision-making about the QUEST trials (Quality of Life after Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction).

Authors:  Natalie Bidad; Lindsay MacDonald; Zoë E Winters; Sarah J L Edwards; Marie Emson; Clare L Griffin; Judith Bliss; Rob Horne
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Why do patients decline surgical trials? Findings from a qualitative interview study embedded in the Cancer Research UK BOLERO trial (Bladder cancer: Open versus Lapararoscopic or RObotic cystectomy).

Authors:  Emily Harrop; John Kelly; Gareth Griffiths; Angela Casbard; Annmarie Nelson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shelley Potter; Elizabeth J Conroy; Ramsey I Cutress; Paula R Williamson; Lisa Whisker; Steven Thrush; Joanna Skillman; Nicola L P Barnes; Senthurun Mylvaganam; Elisabeth Teasdale; Abhilash Jain; Matthew D Gardiner; Jane M Blazeby; Chris Holcombe
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Perceived barriers to randomised controlled trials in breast reconstruction: obstacle to trial initiation or opportunity to resolve? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Gareth Davies; Nicola Mills; Chris Holcombe; Shelley Potter
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Protocol for a mixed-method study to inform the feasibility of undertaking a large-scale multicentre study comparing the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic breast conservation as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction in women unsuitable for standard breast-conserving surgery (the ANTHEM Feasibility Study).

Authors:  Charlotte Davies; Christopher Holcombe; Joanna Skillman; Lisa Whisker; William Hollingworth; Carmel Conefrey; Nicola Mills; Paul White; Charles Comins; Douglas Macmillan; Patricia Fairbrother; Shelley Potter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The challenge of equipoise: qualitative interviews exploring the views of health professionals and women with multiple ipsilateral breast cancer on recruitment to a surgical randomised controlled feasibility trial.

Authors:  Jenny Ingram; Lucy Beasant; John Benson; Adrian Murray Brunt; Anthony Maxwell; James Richard Harvey; Rosemary Greenwood; Nicholas Roberts; Norman Williams; Debbie Johnson; Zoe Winters
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-02-28

7.  Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy.

Authors:  Kirsty Roberts; Nicola Mills; Chris Metcalfe; Athene Lane; Clare Clement; William Hollingworth; Jodi Taylor; Chris Holcombe; Joanna Skillman; Katherine Fairhurst; Lisa Whisker; Ramsey Cutress; Steven Thrush; Patricia Fairbrother; Shelley Potter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Shelley Potter; Elizabeth J Conroy; Paula R Williamson; Steven Thrush; Lisa J Whisker; Joanna M Skillman; Nicola L P Barnes; Ramsey I Cutress; Elizabeth M Teasdale; Nicola Mills; Senthurun Mylvaganam; Olivier A Branford; Katherina McEvoy; Abhilash Jain; Matthew D Gardiner; Jane M Blazeby; Christopher Holcombe
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2016-08-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.