Literature DB >> 25450535

A case series of LMWH use in pregnancy: should trough anti-Xa levels guide dosing?

Michelle Berresheim1, Jodi Wilkie1, Kara A Nerenberg2, Quazi Ibrahim3, Tammy J Bungard4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pregnancy is a thrombogenic state, increasing the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), and the risk of valve thrombosis amongst women with mechanical heart valves (MHV). While low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are generally dosed based on weight (i.e., enoxaparin 1 mg/kg every 12 hours), data in pregnant women have shown that weight-based dosing does not consistently achieve target anti-Xa levels. In women with MHV, our practice includes titrating LMWH doses to target both trough and peak anti-Xa levels, while for those with VTE peak anti-Xa levels guide dosing. MATERIALS/
METHODS: This retrospective case series included pregnant women requiring LMWH treatment doses with at least 3 peak (+/-trough) anti-Xa levels. Our primary objective was to describe the actual LMWH dose required to achieve targeted anti-Xa levels relative to weight-based dosing in patients with MHV. Secondarily, we compared the same for VTE patients; compared actual dosing between those with MHV and VTE; and examined maternal and fetal outcomes. RESULTS/
CONCLUSION: Women with MHV (N=4) required greater than weight-based dosing of enoxaparin (1.35 mg/kg Q12H) to achieve targeted anti-Xa levels. Importantly, achieving target peak anti-Xa levels did not always ensure maintenance of minimum trough levels. VTE patients (N=12) did not require more enoxaparin (0.96 mg/kg Q12H) than weight based dosing. MHV patients received more enoxaparin compared to VTE patients (P<0.001). No bleeding or clotting complications were associated with LMWH administration. In pregnant women with MHV at high risk of thromboembolism, LMWH dosing guided by trough and peak anti-Xa levels should be considered.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-Xa level; Low molecular weight heparin; Mechanical prosthetic valve; Pregnancy; Thrombosis; Venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25450535     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.09.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  4 in total

1.  Outcomes of prosthetic valve replacement in women of child-bearing age.

Authors:  Go Kataoka; Ryota Asano; Atsuhiko Sato; Wataru Tatsuishi; Kiyoharu Nakano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: venous thromboembolism in the context of pregnancy.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Anita Rajasekhar; Saskia Middeldorp; Claire McLintock; Marc A Rodger; Andra H James; Sara R Vazquez; Ian A Greer; John J Riva; Meha Bhatt; Nicole Schwab; Danielle Barrett; Andrea LaHaye; Bram Rochwerg
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

3.  How can Secondary Thromboprophylaxis in High-Risk Pregnant Patients be Improved?

Authors:  Lucia Stanciakova; Miroslava Dobrotova; Pavol Holly; Jana Zolkova; Lubica Vadelova; Ingrid Skornova; Jela Ivankova; Matej Samos; Tomas Bolek; Marian Grendar; Jan Danko; Peter Kubisz; Jan Stasko
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

Review 4.  Pregnancy Considerations in the Multidisciplinary Care of Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Julie Coursen; Catherine E Simpson; Monica Mukherjee; Arthur J Vaught; Shelby Kutty; Tala K Al-Talib; Malissa J Wood; Nandita S Scott; Stephen C Mathai; Garima Sharma
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-08-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.