Julien Sigala1, Christophe Sifer2, Didier Dewailly3, Geoffroy Robin3, Aude Bruyneel3, Nassima Ramdane4, Valérie Lefebvre-Khalil5, Valérie Mitchell5, Christine Decanter3. 1. EA 4308 Gamétogenèse et qualité du gamète, Institut de Biologie de la Reproduction-Spermiologie-CECOS, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire, Lille, France. Electronic address: christine.decanter@chru-lille.fr. 2. Service d'Histologie-Embryologie-Cytogénétique-CECOS, Hôpital Jean Verdier (AP-HP), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Bondy, France. 3. Service de Gynécologie Endocrinienne et Médecine de la Reproduction, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire, Lille, France. 4. Centre d'Etudes et de Recherche en Informatique Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire, Lille, France. 5. EA 4308 Gamétogenèse et qualité du gamète, Institut de Biologie de la Reproduction-Spermiologie-CECOS, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire, Lille, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM) and oocyte quality after controlled ovarian stimulation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). DESIGN: Prospective, comparative study with concurrently treated and age-matched controls. SETTING: Academic IVF unit of the Lille University Hospital. PATIENT(S): A total of 194 women were prospectively included before their first IVF-ICSI attempt for exclusive male infertility. They were classified into PCOM (n = 97) or control groups (n = 97) according to their follicle number per ovary. The nuclear maturation and morphologic aspects of 1,013 oocytes from PCOM patients were assessed and compared with those of 774 oocytes from controls. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Rate of metaphase II (MII) and morphologically abnormal oocytes. RESULT(S): The mean number of total and MII oocytes retrieved was significantly higher in the PCOM group. The rate of MII and morphologically abnormal oocytes was equivalent between the two groups. The mean number of embryos was significantly higher in the PCOM group. However, the percentage of top-quality embryos on day 3 was similar between the two groups. The implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the PCOM group. CONCLUSION(S): Polycystic ovarian morphology does not have a negative impact on the quality of oocytes and embryos or the outcome of IVF-ICSI.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM) and oocyte quality after controlled ovarian stimulation for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). DESIGN: Prospective, comparative study with concurrently treated and age-matched controls. SETTING: Academic IVF unit of the Lille University Hospital. PATIENT(S): A total of 194 women were prospectively included before their first IVF-ICSI attempt for exclusive male infertility. They were classified into PCOM (n = 97) or control groups (n = 97) according to their follicle number per ovary. The nuclear maturation and morphologic aspects of 1,013 oocytes from PCOM patients were assessed and compared with those of 774 oocytes from controls. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Rate of metaphase II (MII) and morphologically abnormal oocytes. RESULT(S): The mean number of total and MII oocytes retrieved was significantly higher in the PCOM group. The rate of MII and morphologically abnormal oocytes was equivalent between the two groups. The mean number of embryos was significantly higher in the PCOM group. However, the percentage of top-quality embryos on day 3 was similar between the two groups. The implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the PCOM group. CONCLUSION(S): Polycystic ovarian morphology does not have a negative impact on the quality of oocytes and embryos or the outcome of IVF-ICSI.
Authors: George Queiroz Vaz; Alessandra Viviane Evangelista; Cassio Alessandro Paganoti Sartorio; Maria Cecilia Almeida Cardoso; Maria Cecilia Erthal; Paulo Gallo; Marco Aurelio Pinho Oliveira Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 3.411