Literature DB >> 25450217

A classification study of kinematic gait trajectories in hip osteoarthritis.

D Laroche1, A Tolambiya2, C Morisset1, J F Maillefert3, R M French4, P Ornetti3, E Thomas5.   

Abstract

The clinical evaluation of patients in hip osteoarthritis is often done using patient questionnaires. While this provides important information it is also necessary to continue developing objective measures. In this work we further investigate the studies concerning the use of 3D gait analysis to attain this goal. The gait analysis was associated with machine learning methods in order to provide a direct measure of patient control gait discrimination. The applied machine learning method was the support vector machine (SVM). Applying the SVM on all the measured kinematic trajectories, we were able to classify individual patient and control gait cycles with a mean success rate of 88%. With the use of an ROC curve to establish the threshold number of cycles necessary for a subject to be identified as a patient, this allowed for an accuracy of higher than 90% for discriminating patient and control subjects. We then went on to determine the importance of each trajectory. By ranking the capacity of each trajectory for this discrimination, we provided a guide on their order of importance in evaluating patient severity. In order to be clinically relevant, any measure of patient deficit must be compared with clinically validated scores of functional disability. In the case of hip osteoarthritis (OA), the WOMAC scores are currently one of the most widely accepted clinical scores for quantifying OA severity. The kinematic trajectories that provided the best patient-control discrimination with the SVM were found to correlate well but imperfectly with the WOMAC scores, hence indicating the presence of complementary information in the two.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthritis; Gait analysis; Kinematic trajectories; Support vector machines; Trajectory selection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25450217     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  7 in total

1.  Gait analysis dataset of healthy volunteers and patients before and 6 months after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aurélie Bertaux; Mathieu Gueugnon; Florent Moissenet; Baptiste Orliac; Pierre Martz; Jean-Francis Maillefert; Paul Ornetti; Davy Laroche
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 8.501

2.  Can the Output of a Learned Classification Model Monitor a Person's Functional Recovery Status Post-Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jill Emmerzaal; Arne De Brabandere; Rob van der Straaten; Johan Bellemans; Liesbet De Baets; Jesse Davis; Ilse Jonkers; Annick Timmermans; Benedicte Vanwanseele
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  Machine learning in human movement biomechanics: Best practices, common pitfalls, and new opportunities.

Authors:  Eni Halilaj; Apoorva Rajagopal; Madalina Fiterau; Jennifer L Hicks; Trevor J Hastie; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Towards an Inertial Sensor-Based Wearable Feedback System for Patients after Total Hip Arthroplasty: Validity and Applicability for Gait Classification with Gait Kinematics-Based Features.

Authors:  Wolfgang Teufl; Bertram Taetz; Markus Miezal; Michael Lorenz; Juliane Pietschmann; Thomas Jöllenbeck; Michael Fröhlich; Gabriele Bleser
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Systematic Comparison of the Influence of Different Data Preprocessing Methods on the Performance of Gait Classifications Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Johannes Burdack; Fabian Horst; Sven Giesselbach; Ibrahim Hassan; Sabrina Daffner; Wolfgang I Schöllhorn
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-15

Review 6.  Machine Learning in Orthopedics: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Federico Cabitza; Angela Locoro; Giuseppe Banfi
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06-27

7.  Interpretability of Input Representations for Gait Classification in Patients after Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Carlo Dindorf; Wolfgang Teufl; Bertram Taetz; Gabriele Bleser; Michael Fröhlich
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.