Literature DB >> 25450097

Applying species-tree analyses to deep phylogenetic histories: challenges and potential suggested from a survey of empirical phylogenetic studies.

Hayley C Lanier1, L Lacey Knowles2.   

Abstract

Coalescent-based methods for species-tree estimation are becoming a dominant approach for reconstructing species histories from multi-locus data, with most of the studies examining these methodologies focused on recently diverged species. However, deeper phylogenies, such as the datasets that comprise many Tree of Life (ToL) studies, also exhibit gene-tree discordance. This discord may also arise from the stochastic sorting of gene lineages during the speciation process (i.e., reflecting the random coalescence of gene lineages in ancestral populations). It remains unknown whether guidelines regarding methodologies and numbers of loci established by simulation studies at shallow tree depths translate into accurate species relationships for deeper phylogenetic histories. We address this knowledge gap and specifically identify the challenges and limitations of species-tree methods that account for coalescent variance for deeper phylogenies. Using simulated data with characteristics informed by empirical studies, we evaluate both the accuracy of estimated species trees and the characteristics associated with recalcitrant nodes, with a specific focus on whether coalescent variance is generally responsible for the lack of resolution. By determining the proportion of coalescent genealogies that support a particular node, we demonstrate that (1) species-tree methods account for coalescent variance at deep nodes and (2) mutational variance - not gene-tree discord arising from the coalescent - posed the primary challenge for accurate reconstruction across the tree. For example, many nodes were accurately resolved despite predicted discord from the random coalescence of gene lineages and nodes with poor support were distributed across a range of depths (i.e., they were not restricted to a particular recent divergences). Given their broad taxonomic scope and large sampling of taxa, deep level phylogenies pose several potential methodological complications including difficulties with MCMC convergence and estimation of requisite population genetic parameters for coalescent-based approaches. Despite these difficulties, the findings generally support the utility of species-tree analyses for the estimation of species relationships throughout the ToL. We discuss strategies for successful application of species-tree approaches to deep phylogenies.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  (∗)BEAST; Coalescent variance; Data sufficiency; Incomplete lineage sorting; Mutational variance; Tree of Life (ToL) studies

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25450097     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  4 in total

1.  QuCo: quartet-based co-estimation of species trees and gene trees.

Authors:  Maryam Rabiee; Siavash Mirarab
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.931

2.  Investigating Difficult Nodes in the Placental Mammal Tree with Expanded Taxon Sampling and Thousands of Ultraconserved Elements.

Authors:  Jacob A Esselstyn; Carl H Oliveros; Mark T Swanson; Brant C Faircloth
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.416

3.  Evolutionary history of endemic Sulawesi squirrels constructed from UCEs and mitogenomes sequenced from museum specimens.

Authors:  Melissa T R Hawkins; Jennifer A Leonard; Kristofer M Helgen; Molly M McDonough; Larry L Rockwood; Jesus E Maldonado
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Comparing species tree estimation with large anchored phylogenomic and small Sanger-sequenced molecular datasets: an empirical study on Malagasy pseudoxyrhophiine snakes.

Authors:  Sara Ruane; Christopher J Raxworthy; Alan R Lemmon; Emily Moriarty Lemmon; Frank T Burbrink
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.260

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.