Literature DB >> 25449847

Tasting calories differentially affects brain activation during hunger and satiety.

Inge van Rijn1, Cees de Graaf2, Paul A M Smeets3.   

Abstract

An important function of eating is ingesting energy. Our objectives were to assess whether oral exposure to caloric and non-caloric stimuli elicits discriminable responses in the brain and to determine in how far these responses are modulated by hunger state and sweetness. Thirty women tasted three stimuli in two motivational states (hunger and satiety) while their brain responses were measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging in a randomized crossover design. Stimuli were solutions of sucralose (sweet, no energy), maltodextrin (non-sweet, energy) and sucralose+maltodextrin (sweet, energy). We found no main effect of energy content and no interaction between energy content and sweetness. However, there was an interaction between hunger state and energy content in the median cingulate (bilaterally), ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior insula and thalamus. This indicates that the anterior insula and thalamus, areas in which hunger state and taste of a stimulus are integrated, also integrate hunger state with caloric content of a taste stimulus. Furthermore, in the median cingulate and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, tasting energy resulted in more activation during satiety compared to hunger. This finding indicates that these areas, which are known to be involved in processes that require approach and avoidance, are also involved in guiding ingestive behavior. In conclusion, our results suggest that energy sensing is a hunger state dependent process, in which the median cingulate, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior insula and thalamus play a central role by integrating hunger state with stimulus relevance.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbohydrate; Energy sensing; Median cingulate; Oral cavity; Sweetness; fMRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25449847     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

Review 1.  Hunger and BMI modulate neural responses to sweet stimuli: fMRI meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eunice Y Chen; Thomas A Zeffiro
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  Walnut consumption increases activation of the insula to highly desirable food cues: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over fMRI study.

Authors:  Olivia M Farr; Dario Tuccinardi; Jagriti Upadhyay; Sabrina M Oussaada; Christos S Mantzoros
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.577

3.  Hunger state affects both olfactory abilities and gustatory sensitivity.

Authors:  Deniz Hanci; Huseyin Altun
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Gustatory responses in macaque monkeys revealed with fMRI: Comments on taste, taste preference, and internal state.

Authors:  Peter M Kaskan; Aaron M Dean; Mark A Nicholas; Andrew R Mitz; Elisabeth A Murray
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Meal replacement and functional connectivity in the brain network for appetite: connecting the dots.

Authors:  Tanya Zilberter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-28

6.  It's in the eye of the beholder: selective attention to drink properties during tasting influences brain activation in gustatory and reward regions.

Authors:  Inge van Rijn; Cees de Graaf; Paul A M Smeets
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.978

7.  Neural Processing of Calories in Brain Reward Areas Can be Modulated by Reward Sensitivity.

Authors:  Inge van Rijn; Sanne Griffioen-Roose; Cees de Graaf; Paul A M Smeets
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  How Does Our Brain Process Sugars and Non-Nutritive Sweeteners Differently: A Systematic Review on Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies.

Authors:  Andy Wai Kan Yeung; Natalie Sui Miu Wong
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Obesity and Sex-Related Associations With Differential Effects of Sucralose vs Sucrose on Appetite and Reward Processing: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Alexandra G Yunker; Jasmin M Alves; Shan Luo; Brendan Angelo; Alexis DeFendis; Trevor A Pickering; John R Monterosso; Kathleen A Page
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-09-01

Review 10.  Structural and functional brain alterations in anorexia nervosa:A multimodal meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Ting Su; Jiaying Gong; Guixian Tang; Shaojuan Qiu; Pan Chen; Guanmao Chen; Junjing Wang; Li Huang; Ying Wang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 5.038

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.