Literature DB >> 25449162

Target frequency influences antisaccade endpoint bias: evidence for perceptual averaging.

Caitlin Gillen1, Matthew Heath.   

Abstract

Perceptual judgments related to stimulus-sets are represented computationally different than individual items. In particular, the perceptual averaging hypothesis contends that the visual system represents target properties (e.g., eccentricity) via a statistical summary of the individual targets included within a stimulus-set. Here we sought to determine whether perceptual averaging governs the visual information mediating an oculomotor task requiring top-down control (i.e., antisaccade). To that end, participants completed antisaccades (i.e., saccade mirror-symmetrical to a target) – and complementary prosaccades (i.e., saccade to veridical target location) – to different target eccentricities (10.5°, 15.5° and 20.5°) located left and right of a common fixation. Importantly, trials were completed in blocks wherein eccentricities were presented with equal frequency (i.e., control condition) and when the ‘proximal’ (10.5°: i.e., proximal-weighting condition) and ‘distal’ (20.5°: i.e., distal-weighting condition) targets were respectively presented five times as often as the other eccentricities. If antisaccades are governed by a statistical summary then amplitudes should be biased in the direction of the most frequently presented target within a block. As expected, pro- and antisaccade across each target eccentricity were associated with an undershooting bias and prosaccades were refractory to the manipulation of target frequency. Most notably, antisaccades in the proximal-weighting condition had a larger undershooting bias than the control condition, whereas the converse was true for the distal-weighing condition; that is, antisaccades were biased in the direction of the most frequently presented target. Thus, we propose that perceptual averaging extends to motor tasks requiring top-down cognitive control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25449162     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Alternating between pro- and antisaccades: switch-costs manifest via decoupling the spatial relations between stimulus and response.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Caitlin Gillen; Ashna Samani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Increased cerebral blood flow supports a single-bout postexercise benefit to executive function: evidence from hypercapnia.

Authors:  Benjamin Tari; James J Vanhie; Glen R Belfry; J Kevin Shoemaker; Matthew Heath
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Pro- and antisaccade task-switching: response suppression-and not vector inversion-contributes to a task-set inertia.

Authors:  Benjamin Tari; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The antisaccade task: visual distractors elicit a location-independent planning 'cost'.

Authors:  Jesse C DeSimone; Stefan Everling; Matthew Heath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The unidirectional prosaccade switch-cost: no evidence for the passive dissipation of an oculomotor task-set inertia.

Authors:  Benjamin Tari; Chloe Edgar; Priyanka Persaud; Connor Dalton; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.064

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.