Tommy C Y Chan1, Jasmine K M Lam1, Vishal Jhanji2, Emmy Y M Li3. 1. Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Hong Kong, China; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. 2. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. 3. Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Hong Kong, China; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Electronic address: dr.emmyli@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the outcome of primary anterior chamber vs secondary scleral-fixated intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in complicated cataract surgeries. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative study. METHODS: A consecutive series of complicated cataract surgeries with primary anterior chamber (ACIOL) or secondary scleral-fixated IOL implantation from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2009 was analyzed. Main outcome measures included the postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and postoperative complications. RESULTS: There were 89 eyes in the primary ACIOL group and 74 eyes in the secondary scleral-fixated IOL group. The mean follow-up duration was 64.1 ± 36.7 months. The mean postoperative logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA at 1 year was 0.32 ± 0.54 and 0.34 ± 0.21 in the primary ACIOL group and the secondary scleral-fixated IOL group, respectively (P = .734). The mean latest logMAR BCVA was 0.68 ± 0.54 and 0.61 ± 0.47 in the primary ACIOL group and the secondary scleral-fixated IOL group, respectively (P = .336). The primary ACIOL group had more early postoperative complications (P < .001). No difference in late postoperative complications was observed between the 2 groups (P = .100). Regression analysis showed that primary ACIOL and secondary scleral-fixated IOL implantation had similar latest postoperative logMAR BCVA (P = .927), while the presence of late complications was associated with a worse final visual outcome (P = .000). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that there are no long-term differences in the visual outcomes and complication profiles after primary ACIOL or secondary scleral-fixated IOL implantation in a complicated cataract operation when capsular support is inadequate.
PURPOSE: To compare the outcome of primary anterior chamber vs secondary scleral-fixated intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in complicated cataract surgeries. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative study. METHODS: A consecutive series of complicated cataract surgeries with primary anterior chamber (ACIOL) or secondary scleral-fixated IOL implantation from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2009 was analyzed. Main outcome measures included the postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and postoperative complications. RESULTS: There were 89 eyes in the primary ACIOL group and 74 eyes in the secondary scleral-fixated IOL group. The mean follow-up duration was 64.1 ± 36.7 months. The mean postoperative logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA at 1 year was 0.32 ± 0.54 and 0.34 ± 0.21 in the primary ACIOL group and the secondary scleral-fixated IOL group, respectively (P = .734). The mean latest logMAR BCVA was 0.68 ± 0.54 and 0.61 ± 0.47 in the primary ACIOL group and the secondary scleral-fixated IOL group, respectively (P = .336). The primary ACIOL group had more early postoperative complications (P < .001). No difference in late postoperative complications was observed between the 2 groups (P = .100). Regression analysis showed that primary ACIOL and secondary scleral-fixated IOL implantation had similar latest postoperative logMAR BCVA (P = .927), while the presence of late complications was associated with a worse final visual outcome (P = .000). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that there are no long-term differences in the visual outcomes and complication profiles after primary ACIOL or secondary scleral-fixated IOL implantation in a complicated cataract operation when capsular support is inadequate.
Authors: Tomasz Choragiewicz; Robert Rejdak; Andrzej Grzybowski; Katarzyna Nowomiejska; Joanna Moneta-Wielgoś; Małgorzata Ozimek; Anselm G M Jünemann Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 1.909