Literature DB >> 25448759

Machine-learning approaches in drug discovery: methods and applications.

Antonio Lavecchia1.   

Abstract

During the past decade, virtual screening (VS) has evolved from traditional similarity searching, which utilizes single reference compounds, into an advanced application domain for data mining and machine-learning approaches, which require large and representative training-set compounds to learn robust decision rules. The explosive growth in the amount of public domain-available chemical and biological data has generated huge effort to design, analyze, and apply novel learning methodologies. Here, I focus on machine-learning techniques within the context of ligand-based VS (LBVS). In addition, I analyze several relevant VS studies from recent publications, providing a detailed view of the current state-of-the-art in this field and highlighting not only the problematic issues, but also the successes and opportunities for further advances.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25448759     DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Discov Today        ISSN: 1359-6446            Impact factor:   7.851


  90 in total

Review 1.  QSAR without borders.

Authors:  Eugene N Muratov; Jürgen Bajorath; Robert P Sheridan; Igor V Tetko; Dmitry Filimonov; Vladimir Poroikov; Tudor I Oprea; Igor I Baskin; Alexandre Varnek; Adrian Roitberg; Olexandr Isayev; Stefano Curtarolo; Denis Fourches; Yoram Cohen; Alan Aspuru-Guzik; David A Winkler; Dimitris Agrafiotis; Artem Cherkasov; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  Is it a Prime Time for AI-powered Virtual Drug Screening?

Authors:  Kristy Carpenter; Xudong Huang
Journal:  EC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2017-11-27

3.  Predicting DPP-IV inhibitors with machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Jie Cai; Chanjuan Li; Zhihong Liu; Jiewen Du; Jiming Ye; Qiong Gu; Jun Xu
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  The Aristotle Classifier: Using the Whole Glycomic Profile To Indicate a Disease State.

Authors:  David Hua; Milani Wijeweera Patabandige; Eden P Go; Heather Desaire
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Multi-task generative topographic mapping in virtual screening.

Authors:  Arkadii Lin; Dragos Horvath; Gilles Marcou; Bernd Beck; Alexandre Varnek
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Quantum probability ranking principle for ligand-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Mohammed Mumtaz Al-Dabbagh; Naomie Salim; Mubarak Himmat; Ali Ahmed; Faisal Saeed
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Docking-undocking combination applied to the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.

Authors:  Sergio Ruiz-Carmona; Xavier Barril
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Interpretation of machine learning models using shapley values: application to compound potency and multi-target activity predictions.

Authors:  Raquel Rodríguez-Pérez; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Improving scoring-docking-screening powers of protein-ligand scoring functions using random forest.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Hispaglabridin B, a constituent of liquorice identified by a bioinformatics and machine learning approach, relieves protein-energy wasting by inhibiting forkhead box O1.

Authors:  Zeng-Yan Huang; Ling-Jun Wang; Jia-Jia Wang; Wen-Jun Feng; Zhong-Qi Yang; Shi-Hao Ni; Yu-Sheng Huang; Huan Li; Yi Yang; Ming-Qing Wang; Rong Hu; Heng Wan; Chan-Juan Wen; Shao-Xiang Xian; Lu Lu
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 8.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.