Literature DB >> 25448486

Use of patient-reported outcomes to measure symptoms and health related quality of life in the clinic.

Alexandra Gilbert1, David Sebag-Montefiore2, Susan Davidson3, Galina Velikova4.   

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in routine practice in cancer care to measure symptoms and health related quality of life (HRQOL). PROs are designed to capture the patient's perspective of their care and treatment, and complement the traditional clinical outcomes of survival and toxicity assessment. Integrating routine collection and feedback of PROs has been found to improve care for patients on both an individual level, through improved communication and management of symptoms, and at an organizational level, by enabling aggregation of data to compare performance. This article reviews the benefits and challenges of introducing patient-reported assessments into routine clinical practice. Methods for choosing a questionnaire; collection and presentation of results; timing and frequency of administration as well as clinician training methods to aid the ability of clinicians to integrate the use of PROs into their own practice are described. Electronic PRO capture and integration with electronic health records seems to provide the most effective method for seamless integration into existing patient care pathways. Case studies from our own practice illustrate the issues raised. Electronic methods enabling immediate collection, scoring and interpretation of the data, as well as real-time data capture, email alert systems and individualized, online self-management advice may enable severe symptoms to be managed in a more timely manner. Evaluation methods are described to establish the effectiveness of the PRO intervention. Engaging stakeholders throughout the process of initial consultation and development, during delivery and evaluation is key to success. Future work needs to focus on the effectiveness of PROs in longer-term follow-up of patients in routine care and the relationship between the PRO severity grading and clinician severity grading using the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE).
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical practice; Electronic data capture; Health related quality of life; Internet; Patient report outcomes; Symptoms

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25448486     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  22 in total

1.  Linking of the quality of life in neurological disorders (Neuro-QoL) to the international classification of functioning, disability and health.

Authors:  Alex W K Wong; Stephen C L Lau; David Cella; Jin-Shei Lai; Guanli Xie; Lidian Chen; Chetwyn C H Chan; Allen W Heinemann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  [Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy does not negatively impact the postoperative quality of life of esophageal cancer patients].

Authors:  Moritz Luttke; Nils Henrik Nicolay
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Impact of National Institutes of Health Gastrointestinal PROMIS Measures in Clinical Practice: Results of a Multicenter Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Christopher V Almario; William D Chey; Dinesh Khanna; Sasan Mosadeghi; Shahzad Ahmed; Elham Afghani; Cynthia Whitman; Garth Fuller; Mark Reid; Roger Bolus; Buddy Dennis; Rey Encarnacion; Bibiana Martinez; Jennifer Soares; Rushaba Modi; Nikhil Agarwal; Aaron Lee; Scott Kubomoto; Gobind Sharma; Sally Bolus; Brennan M R Spiegel
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Computerized Adaptive Testing in Pediatric Brain Tumor Clinics.

Authors:  Jin-Shei Lai; Jennifer L Beaumont; Cindy J Nowinski; David Cella; William F Hartsell; John Han-Chih Chang; Peter E Manley; Stewart Goldman
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Usability and Workflow Evaluation of "RhEumAtic Disease activitY" (READY). A Mobile Application for Rheumatology Patients and Providers.

Authors:  Po-Yin Yen; Barbara Lara; Marcelo Lopetegui; Aseem Bharat; Stacy Ardoin; Bernadette Johnson; Puneet Mathur; Peter J Embi; Jeffrey R Curtis
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Clinical Decision Support for Symptom Management in Lung Cancer Patients: A Group RCT.

Authors:  Mary E Cooley; Emanuele Mazzola; Niya Xiong; Fangxin Hong; David F Lobach; Ilana M Braun; Barbara Halpenny; Michael S Rabin; Ellis Johns; Kathleen Finn; Donna Berry; Ruth McCorkle; Janet L Abrahm
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 5.576

7.  Time efficiency of a web-based questionnaire in urogynecology: a randomized study.

Authors:  Selina Posthuma; J Marinus van der Ploeg; Britt A H van Etten-deBruijn; David P van der Ham
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Symptom burden profiles in men with advanced prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Blanca Noriega Esquives; Tae K Lee; Patricia I Moreno; Rina S Fox; Betina Yanez; Gregory E Miller; Ryne Estabrook; Mark J Begale; Sarah C Flury; Kent Perry; Shilajit D Kundu; Frank J Penedo
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2022-02-02

9.  From statistics to clinics: the visual feedback of PROMIS® CATs.

Authors:  Maud M van Muilekom; Michiel A J Luijten; Hedy A van Oers; Caroline B Terwee; Raphaële R L van Litsenburg; Leo D Roorda; Martha A Grootenhuis; Lotte Haverman
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-07-10

10.  Patient and health care provider perceptions of cancer-related fatigue and pain.

Authors:  Loretta A Williams; Chet Bohac; Sharon Hunter; David Cella
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.