Literature DB >> 25448294

Combining MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq to investigate genome-wide CpG methylation.

Daofeng Li1, Bo Zhang1, Xiaoyun Xing1, Ting Wang2.   

Abstract

DNA CpG methylation is a widespread epigenetic mark in high eukaryotes including mammals. DNA methylation plays key roles in diverse biological processes such as X chromosome inactivation, transposable element repression, genomic imprinting, and control of gene expression. Recent advancements in sequencing-based DNA methylation profiling methods provide an unprecedented opportunity to measure DNA methylation in a genome-wide fashion, making it possible to comprehensively investigate the role of DNA methylation. Several methods have been developed, such as Whole Genome Bisulfite Sequencing (WGBS), Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing (RRBS), and enrichment-based methods including Methylation Dependent ImmunoPrecipitation followed by sequencing (MeDIP-seq), methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) protein-enriched genome sequencing (MBD-seq), methyltransferase-directed Transfer of Activated Groups followed by sequencing (mTAG), and Methylation-sensitive Restriction Enzyme digestion followed by sequencing (MRE-seq). These methods differ by their genomic CpG coverage, resolution, quantitative accuracy, cost, and software for analyzing the data. Among these, WGBS is considered the gold standard. However, it is still a cost-prohibitive technology for a typical laboratory due to the required sequencing depth. We found that by integrating two enrichment-based methods that are complementary in nature (i.e., MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq), we can significantly increase the efficiency of whole DNA methylome profiling. By using two recently developed computational algorithms (i.e., M&M and methylCRF), the combination of MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq produces genome-wide CpG methylation measurement at high coverage and high resolution, and robust predictions of differentially methylated regions. Thus, the combination of the two enrichment-based methods provides a cost-effective alternative to WGBS. In this article we describe both the experimental protocols for performing MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq, and the computational protocols for running M&M and methylCRF.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA methylation; M&M; MRE-seq; MeDIP-seq; methylCRF

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25448294      PMCID: PMC4300244          DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.10.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  41 in total

Review 1.  DNA methylation and human disease.

Authors:  Keith D Robertson
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  MEDME: an experimental and analytical methodology for the estimation of DNA methylation levels based on microarray derived MeDIP-enrichment.

Authors:  Mattia Pelizzola; Yasuo Koga; Alexander Eckehart Urban; Michael Krauthammer; Sherman Weissman; Ruth Halaban; Annette M Molinaro
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  methylC Track: visual integration of single-base resolution DNA methylation data on the WashU EpiGenome Browser.

Authors:  Xin Zhou; Daofeng Li; Rebecca F Lowdon; Joseph F Costello; Ting Wang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  The role of gene DCDC2 in German dyslexics.

Authors:  A Wilcke; J Weissfuss; H Kirsten; G Wolfram; J Boltze; P Ahnert
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  2009-02-24

5.  Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells.

Authors:  Alexander Meissner; Tarjei S Mikkelsen; Hongcang Gu; Marius Wernig; Jacob Hanna; Andrey Sivachenko; Xiaolan Zhang; Bradley E Bernstein; Chad Nusbaum; David B Jaffe; Andreas Gnirke; Rudolf Jaenisch; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-07-06       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for comparative high-resolution DNA methylation analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Meissner; Andreas Gnirke; George W Bell; Bernard Ramsahoye; Eric S Lander; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Microarray-based DNA methylation profiling: technology and applications.

Authors:  Axel Schumacher; Philipp Kapranov; Zachary Kaminsky; James Flanagan; Abbas Assadzadeh; Patrick Yau; Carl Virtanen; Neil Winegarden; Jill Cheng; Thomas Gingeras; Arturas Petronis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  The human colon cancer methylome shows similar hypo- and hypermethylation at conserved tissue-specific CpG island shores.

Authors:  Rafael A Irizarry; Christine Ladd-Acosta; Andrew P Feinberg; Bo Wen; Zhijin Wu; Carolina Montano; Patrick Onyango; Hengmi Cui; Kevin Gabo; Michael Rongione; Maree Webster; Hong Ji; James Potash; Sarven Sabunciyan
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-01-18       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning.

Authors:  Shawn J Cokus; Suhua Feng; Xiaoyu Zhang; Zugen Chen; Barry Merriman; Christian D Haudenschild; Sriharsa Pradhan; Stanley F Nelson; Matteo Pellegrini; Steven E Jacobsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A large genome center's improvements to the Illumina sequencing system.

Authors:  Michael A Quail; Iwanka Kozarewa; Frances Smith; Aylwyn Scally; Philip J Stephens; Richard Durbin; Harold Swerdlow; Daniel J Turner
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  41 in total

1.  Induction of hematopoietic and endothelial cell program orchestrated by ETS transcription factor ER71/ETV2.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Daofeng Li; Yik Yeung Lawrence Yu; Inyoung Kang; Min-Ji Cha; Ju Young Kim; Changwon Park; Dennis K Watson; Ting Wang; Kyunghee Choi
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Statistical challenges in analyzing methylation and long-range chromosomal interaction data.

Authors:  Zhaohui Qin; Ben Li; Karen N Conneely; Hao Wu; Ming Hu; Deepak Ayyala; Yongseok Park; Victor X Jin; Fangyuan Zhang; Han Zhang; Li Li; Shili Lin
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2016-03-07

3.  Comparative analysis of MBD-seq and MeDIP-seq and estimation of gene expression changes in a rodent model of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jennifer L Neary; Stephanie M Perez; Kara Peterson; Daniel J Lodge; Melanie A Carless
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.736

4.  Genome-Wide Epigenetic Studies in Human Disease: A Primer on -Omic Technologies.

Authors:  Huihuang Yan; Shulan Tian; Susan L Slager; Zhifu Sun; Tamas Ordog
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  cuRRBS: simple and robust evaluation of enzyme combinations for reduced representation approaches.

Authors:  Daniel E Martin-Herranz; António J M Ribeiro; Felix Krueger; Janet M Thornton; Wolf Reik; Thomas M Stubbs
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  TFIID Enables RNA Polymerase II Promoter-Proximal Pausing.

Authors:  Charli B Fant; Cecilia B Levandowski; Kapil Gupta; Zachary L Maas; John Moir; Jonathan D Rubin; Andrew Sawyer; Meagan N Esbin; Jenna K Rimel; Olivia Luyties; Michael T Marr; Imre Berger; Robin D Dowell; Dylan J Taatjes
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  MethRaFo: MeDIP-seq methylation estimate using a Random Forest Regressor.

Authors:  Jun Ding; Ziv Bar-Joseph
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 8.  DNA methylation methods: Global DNA methylation and methylomic analyses.

Authors:  Shizhao Li; Trygve O Tollefsbol
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.608

9.  Common DNA methylation dynamics in endometriod adenocarcinoma and glioblastoma suggest universal epigenomic alterations in tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Jennifer A Karlow; Benpeng Miao; Xiaoyun Xing; Ting Wang; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-05-21

10.  Transcriptional Responses to IFN-γ Require Mediator Kinase-Dependent Pause Release and Mechanistically Distinct CDK8 and CDK19 Functions.

Authors:  Iris Steinparzer; Vitaly Sedlyarov; Jonathan D Rubin; Kevin Eislmayr; Matthew D Galbraith; Cecilia B Levandowski; Terezia Vcelkova; Lucy Sneezum; Florian Wascher; Fabian Amman; Renata Kleinova; Heather Bender; Zdenek Andrysik; Joaquin M Espinosa; Giulio Superti-Furga; Robin D Dowell; Dylan J Taatjes; Pavel Kovarik
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.